Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Paolo Brigato , Gianluca Vadalà , Sergio De Salvatore , Leonardo Oggiano , Giuseppe Francesco Papalia , Fabrizio Russo , Rocco Papalia , Pier Francesco Costici , Vincenzo Denaro
{"title":"Harnessing machine learning to predict and prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review","authors":"Paolo Brigato ,&nbsp;Gianluca Vadalà ,&nbsp;Sergio De Salvatore ,&nbsp;Leonardo Oggiano ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Francesco Papalia ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Russo ,&nbsp;Rocco Papalia ,&nbsp;Pier Francesco Costici ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Denaro","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery involves high costs and risks, with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) and Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) being major concerns. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer potential in predicting and preventing these complications. This review examines the role of AI in predicting PJK/PJF, its effectiveness, and future research needs.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Can AI-based models accurately predict PJK/PJF after ASD surgery, and what factors affect their performance?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, analyzing Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 2024. Keywords included “Adult Spinal Deformity,” “PJK,” “PJF,” “AI,” and “ML.” Data extracted included study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical details, AI model parameters, and performance metrics. Bias risk was assessed using the MINORS score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 164 studies, 7 met inclusion criteria (n = 2179 patients). Mean age was 63.2 ± 3.7 years, BMI 26.1 ± 2.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and fusion levels 9.82 ± 1.8. PJK/PJF occurred in 41.1 %. AI models (Random Forest, supervised learning) had accuracy from 72.5 % to 100 % (AUC up to 1.0). Key predictors included age, BMD, spinal alignment, and implant type.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>AI and ML models show promise in predicting PJK/PJF after ASD surgery. However, larger multicenter studies with standardized definitions, BMD assessments, and preoperative MRI integration are needed for broader clinical application and validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277252942500092X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery involves high costs and risks, with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) and Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) being major concerns. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer potential in predicting and preventing these complications. This review examines the role of AI in predicting PJK/PJF, its effectiveness, and future research needs.

Research question

Can AI-based models accurately predict PJK/PJF after ASD surgery, and what factors affect their performance?

Material and methods

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, analyzing Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 2024. Keywords included “Adult Spinal Deformity,” “PJK,” “PJF,” “AI,” and “ML.” Data extracted included study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical details, AI model parameters, and performance metrics. Bias risk was assessed using the MINORS score.

Results

Among 164 studies, 7 met inclusion criteria (n = 2179 patients). Mean age was 63.2 ± 3.7 years, BMI 26.1 ± 2.4 kg/m2, and fusion levels 9.82 ± 1.8. PJK/PJF occurred in 41.1 %. AI models (Random Forest, supervised learning) had accuracy from 72.5 % to 100 % (AUC up to 1.0). Key predictors included age, BMD, spinal alignment, and implant type.

Discussion and conclusions

AI and ML models show promise in predicting PJK/PJF after ASD surgery. However, larger multicenter studies with standardized definitions, BMD assessments, and preoperative MRI integration are needed for broader clinical application and validation.
利用机器学习预测和预防近端关节后凸和成人脊柱畸形手术失败:系统综述
成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术涉及高成本和风险,近端交界性后凸(PJK)和近端交界性功能衰竭(PJF)是主要问题。人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)为预测和预防这些并发症提供了潜力。本文综述了人工智能在预测PJK/PJF中的作用、其有效性以及未来的研究需求。研究问题:基于人工智能的模型能否准确预测ASD术后PJK/PJF,哪些因素影响其表现?材料和方法按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价,分析Medline、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,截止到2024年12月。关键词包括“成人脊柱畸形”、“PJK”、“PJF”、“AI”和“ML”。提取的数据包括研究特征、患者人口统计学、手术细节、AI模型参数和性能指标。偏倚风险采用minor评分进行评估。结果164项研究中,7项符合纳入标准(n = 2179例)。平均年龄63.2±3.7岁,BMI 26.1±2.4 kg/m2,融合水平9.82±1.8。PJK/PJF发生率为41.1%。人工智能模型(随机森林,监督学习)的准确率从72.5%到100% (AUC高达1.0)。关键预测因素包括年龄、骨密度、脊柱对齐和植入物类型。讨论与结论sai和ML模型在预测ASD术后PJK/PJF方面有较好的前景。然而,为了更广泛的临床应用和验证,需要更大规模的多中心研究,包括标准化的定义、BMD评估和术前MRI整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信