Abdülkadir Pektaş , Mehmet Hacıbeyoğlu , Onur İnan
{"title":"Hybridization of the Snake Optimizer and Particle Swarm Optimization for continuous optimization problems","authors":"Abdülkadir Pektaş , Mehmet Hacıbeyoğlu , Onur İnan","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Snake Optimizer (SO), despite its reasonable performance in a variety of continuous optimization problems, struggles by inefficient exploration, stagnation in local optima, and a slow convergence. To improve exploration, accelerate convergence, and avoid local optima, the velocity vector of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was integrated into the Snake Optimizer (SO), resulting in the proposal of the Snake Optimizer Particle Swarm Optimization (SO-PSO) metaheuristic method. To evaluate the applicability of the proposed SO-PSO method, it was evaluated on continuous numerical problems (CEC-2017) and seven real-world engineering problems, benchmarking its performance against contemporary metaheuristic algorithms, including WOA, PSO, GWO, EO, LSHADE, and SO. A comparative analysis of six metaheuristics and SO-PSO was conducted on 30 shifted and rotated benchmark problems across dimensions and population sizes of 30, 50, and 100, as well as seven engineering challenges with population sizes of 30, 50, and 100, each evaluated over 30 independent runs. According to the Friedman ranking results from 270 experimental tests on CEC17 functions, SO-PSO, WOA, PSO, GWO, EO, LSHADE, and SO achieved rankings of <strong>1.62</strong>, 6.5, 5.91, 4.18, 1.98, 4.53, and 3.28, respectively. Regarding the results of the engineering functions, SO-PSO, WOA, PSO, GWO, EO, LSHADE, and SO achieved rankings of <strong>1.82</strong>, 6.19, 3.95, 4, 3.38, 4.34, and 4.33, respectively. Besides, the proposed SO-PSO shows statistically significant difference from other methods in <strong>96.42 %</strong> and <strong>93.65 %</strong> of experimental tests obtained from Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test in CEC17 functions and engineering problems, respectively. Consequently, SO-PSO demonstrated superior performance over other metaheuristics based on experimental and statistical test results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102077"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625001326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Snake Optimizer (SO), despite its reasonable performance in a variety of continuous optimization problems, struggles by inefficient exploration, stagnation in local optima, and a slow convergence. To improve exploration, accelerate convergence, and avoid local optima, the velocity vector of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was integrated into the Snake Optimizer (SO), resulting in the proposal of the Snake Optimizer Particle Swarm Optimization (SO-PSO) metaheuristic method. To evaluate the applicability of the proposed SO-PSO method, it was evaluated on continuous numerical problems (CEC-2017) and seven real-world engineering problems, benchmarking its performance against contemporary metaheuristic algorithms, including WOA, PSO, GWO, EO, LSHADE, and SO. A comparative analysis of six metaheuristics and SO-PSO was conducted on 30 shifted and rotated benchmark problems across dimensions and population sizes of 30, 50, and 100, as well as seven engineering challenges with population sizes of 30, 50, and 100, each evaluated over 30 independent runs. According to the Friedman ranking results from 270 experimental tests on CEC17 functions, SO-PSO, WOA, PSO, GWO, EO, LSHADE, and SO achieved rankings of 1.62, 6.5, 5.91, 4.18, 1.98, 4.53, and 3.28, respectively. Regarding the results of the engineering functions, SO-PSO, WOA, PSO, GWO, EO, LSHADE, and SO achieved rankings of 1.82, 6.19, 3.95, 4, 3.38, 4.34, and 4.33, respectively. Besides, the proposed SO-PSO shows statistically significant difference from other methods in 96.42 % and 93.65 % of experimental tests obtained from Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test in CEC17 functions and engineering problems, respectively. Consequently, SO-PSO demonstrated superior performance over other metaheuristics based on experimental and statistical test results.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology.
The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including:
-Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing)
-Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences)
-Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)