Achieving energy sustainability of Pakistan's power sector through long-term scenario modeling and analysis

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Farhan Haider Joyo , Daniele Groppi , Laveet Kumar , Benedetto Nastasi , Davide Astiaso Garcia
{"title":"Achieving energy sustainability of Pakistan's power sector through long-term scenario modeling and analysis","authors":"Farhan Haider Joyo ,&nbsp;Daniele Groppi ,&nbsp;Laveet Kumar ,&nbsp;Benedetto Nastasi ,&nbsp;Davide Astiaso Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.136549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pakistan's energy sector faces significant challenges compounded by the impacts of climate change from fossil fuel-based emissions. The country's energy sector remains heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels. This reliance also exposes the country to economic vulnerabilities from the volatility of global oil prices, resulting in power shortages and escalating electricity prices. This research explores how long-term energy planning can address these issues by examining four scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), Zero-Emission (ZE), Indigenous Coal (IC), and Energy Efficiency (EE) for 2030 and 2050 using the EnergyPLAN software. The scenarios are evaluated and ranked using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) multi-criteria decision-making technique. Results are compared for policy alignment with Pakistan's Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement. The EnergyPLAN simulation results show that the ZE scenario, a 100 % renewable energy-based system, can meet 1706 TWh demand by 2050, with annual costs of <strong>$</strong>632 Bn, and give a CO<sub>2</sub> reduction of 662 MTCO<sub>2</sub> compared to BAU. The BAU scenario requires <strong>$</strong>610.12 Bn with emissions of 700 MTCO<sub>2</sub>, while the IC scenario incurs lower costs of <strong>$</strong>558.95 Bn but has the highest emissions at 889 MTCO<sub>2</sub>. The EE scenario achieves the lowest costs at <strong>$</strong>551.39 Bn with 450 MTCO<sub>2</sub> emissions due to improved energy efficiency. The WASPAS results emphasize the need for significant investment in renewable energy and aggressive implementation of energy efficiency measures for a sustainable power sector. This study aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers and energy planners to identify an optimal energy scenario, balancing economic, environmental, and policy factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 136549"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225021917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pakistan's energy sector faces significant challenges compounded by the impacts of climate change from fossil fuel-based emissions. The country's energy sector remains heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels. This reliance also exposes the country to economic vulnerabilities from the volatility of global oil prices, resulting in power shortages and escalating electricity prices. This research explores how long-term energy planning can address these issues by examining four scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), Zero-Emission (ZE), Indigenous Coal (IC), and Energy Efficiency (EE) for 2030 and 2050 using the EnergyPLAN software. The scenarios are evaluated and ranked using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) multi-criteria decision-making technique. Results are compared for policy alignment with Pakistan's Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement. The EnergyPLAN simulation results show that the ZE scenario, a 100 % renewable energy-based system, can meet 1706 TWh demand by 2050, with annual costs of $632 Bn, and give a CO2 reduction of 662 MTCO2 compared to BAU. The BAU scenario requires $610.12 Bn with emissions of 700 MTCO2, while the IC scenario incurs lower costs of $558.95 Bn but has the highest emissions at 889 MTCO2. The EE scenario achieves the lowest costs at $551.39 Bn with 450 MTCO2 emissions due to improved energy efficiency. The WASPAS results emphasize the need for significant investment in renewable energy and aggressive implementation of energy efficiency measures for a sustainable power sector. This study aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers and energy planners to identify an optimal energy scenario, balancing economic, environmental, and policy factors.
通过长期情景建模和分析,实现巴基斯坦电力部门的能源可持续性
巴基斯坦的能源部门面临着巨大的挑战,而化石燃料排放带来的气候变化影响又加剧了这一挑战。该国的能源部门仍然严重依赖进口化石燃料。这种依赖也使该国面临全球油价波动带来的经济脆弱性,导致电力短缺和电价上涨。本研究通过使用EnergyPLAN软件研究四种情景,探讨长期能源规划如何解决这些问题:照常经营(BAU)、零排放(ZE)、本土煤炭(IC)和2030年和2050年的能源效率(EE)。使用加权汇总和产品评估(WASPAS)多标准决策技术对场景进行评估和排序。将结果与巴基斯坦在《巴黎协定》下的国家自主贡献的政策一致性进行比较。EnergyPLAN模拟结果表明,到2050年,100%基于可再生能源的ZE方案可以满足1706太瓦时的需求,年成本为6320亿美元,与BAU相比,减少了6.62亿吨二氧化碳。BAU方案需要6101.2亿美元,排放量为7亿吨二氧化碳,而IC方案的成本较低,为5589.5亿美元,但排放量最高,为8.89亿吨二氧化碳。由于能源效率的提高,能效方案的成本最低,为5513.9亿美元,二氧化碳排放量为4.5亿吨。WASPAS的结果强调了对可再生能源的大量投资和积极实施能源效率措施的必要性,以实现可持续的电力部门。本研究旨在为政策制定者和能源规划者提供有价值的见解,以确定最佳的能源方案,平衡经济,环境和政策因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信