Institutional forces that influence the precepting of midwifery students

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Amy Alspaugh CNM, PhD , Julie Blumenfeld CNM, DNP , Laura D. Lindberg PhD
{"title":"Institutional forces that influence the precepting of midwifery students","authors":"Amy Alspaugh CNM, PhD ,&nbsp;Julie Blumenfeld CNM, DNP ,&nbsp;Laura D. Lindberg PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The lack of clinical preceptors, who play a key role in educating future healthcare providers, is often cited as a limitation to growing the midwifery and nursing workforce.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore midwives’ perspectives on barriers to precepting midwifery students in order to support growing the preceptor workforce.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 midwives from across New Jersey. Analysis was guided by the tenets of thematic analysis and the Socioecological Model.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Three overarching institutions were responsible for many of the barriers midwives experienced to precepting students and practicing to the full extent of their training: the state, the hospital, and the university. Recommendations from participants about improvements to support precepting included actionable items for each institution.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>State governments, hospital systems, and academic institutions are vital to efforts to expand the pool of midwifery clinical preceptors needed to grow and diversify the perinatal healthcare workforce, including midwives, in the United States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"73 4","pages":"Article 102435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655425000880","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The lack of clinical preceptors, who play a key role in educating future healthcare providers, is often cited as a limitation to growing the midwifery and nursing workforce.

Purpose

To explore midwives’ perspectives on barriers to precepting midwifery students in order to support growing the preceptor workforce.

Methods

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 midwives from across New Jersey. Analysis was guided by the tenets of thematic analysis and the Socioecological Model.

Discussion

Three overarching institutions were responsible for many of the barriers midwives experienced to precepting students and practicing to the full extent of their training: the state, the hospital, and the university. Recommendations from participants about improvements to support precepting included actionable items for each institution.

Conclusion

State governments, hospital systems, and academic institutions are vital to efforts to expand the pool of midwifery clinical preceptors needed to grow and diversify the perinatal healthcare workforce, including midwives, in the United States.
影响助产学学生观念的制度力量
缺乏临床导师,谁在教育未来的医疗保健提供者发挥关键作用,往往被认为是限制助产士和护理人员的增长。目的探讨助产士对助产士培训障碍的看法,以支持助产士队伍的发展。方法对来自新泽西州各地的18名助产士进行深度定性访谈。分析以专题分析和社会生态模型的原则为指导。三个主要的机构对助产士在指导学生和充分实践培训方面遇到的许多障碍负有责任:国家、医院和大学。与会者提出的关于支持训诫的改进建议包括每个机构的可操作项目。结论:在美国,各州政府、医院系统和学术机构对扩大助产临床培训人员的数量至关重要,这些培训人员需要发展和多样化围产期医疗保健劳动力,包括助产士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信