Probability of fatigue failure and minimum sample size requirements for cyclically loaded bone

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Andrew Koshyk , Andrew J. Pohl , Colin R. Firminger , W. Brent Edwards
{"title":"Probability of fatigue failure and minimum sample size requirements for cyclically loaded bone","authors":"Andrew Koshyk ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Pohl ,&nbsp;Colin R. Firminger ,&nbsp;W. Brent Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fatigue-life measurements of bone exhibit a significant amount of scatter, which may be characterized probabilistically using a Weibull analysis. Despite an abundance of fatigue testing literature, a standard recommendation for the number of samples required to adequately characterize the probability of fatigue failure in bone does not exist. The primary objective of this work was to determine the minimum sample size required to fit a Weibull distribution to fatigue-life measurements of cyclically loaded bone. Two existing experimental datasets comprising cortical and subchondral bone samples were used in this work. Weibull parameters were estimated using both the maximum likelihood and rank regression methods. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate Weibull parameters for different sample sizes and a convergence analysis was used to determine the minimum required sample size. A simulated dataset with known population parameters was also used to assess the accuracy of the estimated Weibull parameters and to compare the two estimation methods. Our findings suggest that as many as <em>n</em> = 11 samples may be required to adequately quantify Weibull parameters from fatigue tests of bone. At the converged sample size, Weibull parameters differed from true population-level parameters by 3 %–25 %, depending on the estimation method. The maximum likelihood method provided the most accurate and precise estimates of Weibull parameters. These findings provide a framework for future studies aimed at reliably quantifying the probability of fatigue failure in bone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 107061"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125001778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fatigue-life measurements of bone exhibit a significant amount of scatter, which may be characterized probabilistically using a Weibull analysis. Despite an abundance of fatigue testing literature, a standard recommendation for the number of samples required to adequately characterize the probability of fatigue failure in bone does not exist. The primary objective of this work was to determine the minimum sample size required to fit a Weibull distribution to fatigue-life measurements of cyclically loaded bone. Two existing experimental datasets comprising cortical and subchondral bone samples were used in this work. Weibull parameters were estimated using both the maximum likelihood and rank regression methods. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate Weibull parameters for different sample sizes and a convergence analysis was used to determine the minimum required sample size. A simulated dataset with known population parameters was also used to assess the accuracy of the estimated Weibull parameters and to compare the two estimation methods. Our findings suggest that as many as n = 11 samples may be required to adequately quantify Weibull parameters from fatigue tests of bone. At the converged sample size, Weibull parameters differed from true population-level parameters by 3 %–25 %, depending on the estimation method. The maximum likelihood method provided the most accurate and precise estimates of Weibull parameters. These findings provide a framework for future studies aimed at reliably quantifying the probability of fatigue failure in bone.
疲劳失效的概率和循环加载骨的最小样本量要求
骨的疲劳寿命测量显示出大量的散射,这可以用威布尔分析的概率性来表征。尽管有大量的疲劳测试文献,但对于充分表征骨骼疲劳失效概率所需的样品数量,还没有一个标准的建议。这项工作的主要目的是确定符合威布尔分布的最小样本量,以适应循环加载骨的疲劳寿命测量。在这项工作中使用了两个现有的实验数据集,包括皮质和软骨下骨样本。使用最大似然和秩回归方法估计威布尔参数。使用蒙特卡罗模拟估计不同样本量下的威布尔参数,并使用收敛分析确定所需的最小样本量。利用已知总体参数的模拟数据集来评估估计的威布尔参数的准确性,并比较两种估计方法。我们的研究结果表明,可能需要多达n = 11个样本来充分量化骨骼疲劳试验的威布尔参数。在收敛样本量下,根据估计方法的不同,威布尔参数与真实总体水平参数的差异为3% - 25%。极大似然法提供了最准确和精确的威布尔参数估计。这些发现为未来的研究提供了一个框架,旨在可靠地量化骨骼疲劳失效的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信