Tracking the multiple sources of sediment within an agricultural catchment in Northeast China

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chengbo Shu , Gang Liu , Hong Chen , Ya Liu , Chenxi Dan , Fekadu Fanjana Falta , Qiong Zhang , Zhen Guo
{"title":"Tracking the multiple sources of sediment within an agricultural catchment in Northeast China","authors":"Chengbo Shu ,&nbsp;Gang Liu ,&nbsp;Hong Chen ,&nbsp;Ya Liu ,&nbsp;Chenxi Dan ,&nbsp;Fekadu Fanjana Falta ,&nbsp;Qiong Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhen Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the multiple sources of sediment is essential for effective soil erosion mitigation and catchment-scale management. However, in the Mollisol region of Northeast China, the complex interplay of human activities, land use changes and developing gullies present significant challenges for accurately identifying sediment sources at the catchment scale. This difficulty hinders a comprehensive understanding of erosion processes in this region. This study employed geochemical fingerprinting techniques to estimate sediment contributions within an agricultural catchment in Northeast China, utilizing three source classification schemes. The goodness-of-fit and virtual mixtures by using a suite of evaluation metrics were employed to evaluate the performance and uncertainty of the mixing model, thereby confirming the applicability of this technique to the study area. Compared to the two-source approach, the multi-source classification schemes indicated lower variability in geochemical elements and reduced model uncertainty. All three source classification schemes consistently identified cultivated land and gully banks as the primary sediment sources. In the four-source classification scheme, the average sediment contributions from cultivated land, gully banks, ephemeral gullies and unsealed roads were 48.1 % ± 26.3 %, 27.8 % ± 18 %, 19.9 % ± 21.6 %, and 4.2 % ± 3.9 %, respectively. Moreover, spatial heterogeneity in sediment contributions across sub-catchments suggests that variations in key erosion drivers, such as land use intensity and gully density, may influence the primary sediment sources within the catchment. These findings provide actionable insights for targeted catchment management and the preservation of Mollisols in Northeast China, advancing strategies to mitigate soil degradation in agriculturally sensitive regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109143"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622500445X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the multiple sources of sediment is essential for effective soil erosion mitigation and catchment-scale management. However, in the Mollisol region of Northeast China, the complex interplay of human activities, land use changes and developing gullies present significant challenges for accurately identifying sediment sources at the catchment scale. This difficulty hinders a comprehensive understanding of erosion processes in this region. This study employed geochemical fingerprinting techniques to estimate sediment contributions within an agricultural catchment in Northeast China, utilizing three source classification schemes. The goodness-of-fit and virtual mixtures by using a suite of evaluation metrics were employed to evaluate the performance and uncertainty of the mixing model, thereby confirming the applicability of this technique to the study area. Compared to the two-source approach, the multi-source classification schemes indicated lower variability in geochemical elements and reduced model uncertainty. All three source classification schemes consistently identified cultivated land and gully banks as the primary sediment sources. In the four-source classification scheme, the average sediment contributions from cultivated land, gully banks, ephemeral gullies and unsealed roads were 48.1 % ± 26.3 %, 27.8 % ± 18 %, 19.9 % ± 21.6 %, and 4.2 % ± 3.9 %, respectively. Moreover, spatial heterogeneity in sediment contributions across sub-catchments suggests that variations in key erosion drivers, such as land use intensity and gully density, may influence the primary sediment sources within the catchment. These findings provide actionable insights for targeted catchment management and the preservation of Mollisols in Northeast China, advancing strategies to mitigate soil degradation in agriculturally sensitive regions.
东北某农业流域多种沉积物来源的追踪研究
了解沉积物的多种来源对于有效减缓土壤侵蚀和流域规模管理至关重要。然而,在东北Mollisol地区,人类活动、土地利用变化和沟槽发育的复杂相互作用对流域尺度沉积物来源的准确识别提出了重大挑战。这一困难阻碍了对该地区侵蚀过程的全面了解。本研究采用地球化学指纹技术,利用三种来源分类方案估算了东北某农业流域的沉积物贡献。采用一套评价指标,通过拟合优度和虚拟混合来评价混合模型的性能和不确定性,从而验证了该技术在研究区域的适用性。与双源分类法相比,多源分类法表明地球化学元素的变异较小,模型的不确定性降低。三种来源分类方案一致认为耕地和沟岸是主要的泥沙来源。在四源分类方案中,耕地、沟岸、短暂沟渠和未封闭道路的平均泥沙贡献率分别为48.1%±26.3%、27.8%±18%、19.9%±21.6%和4.2%±3.9%。此外,各子流域泥沙贡献的空间异质性表明,土地利用强度和沟槽密度等关键侵蚀驱动因素的变化可能会影响流域内的主要泥沙来源。这些研究结果为东北地区定向流域管理和土壤保护提供了可操作的见解,并提出了缓解农业敏感地区土壤退化的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信