Transition or not? Assessing competing narratives in South Africa's just energy transition

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Almut Mohr
{"title":"Transition or not? Assessing competing narratives in South Africa's just energy transition","authors":"Almut Mohr","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates how and why stakeholders in the just energy transition in South Africa, where coal is the main source of electricity and a major export product, support or oppose a transition. Based on novel primary data collected through interviews with the environmental and labour movements in South Africa, with a special focus in Mpumalanga Province, the paper assesses the different narratives that have emerged about the just energy transition. Using an inductive coding process, the empirical analysis reveals narratives around six key themes that justify or reject just energy transition efforts: (1) climate change; (2) environmental pollution; (3) affected communities and workers; (4) energy crisis; (5) international exports; (6) just transition planning and implementation. A cluster analysis reveals differences between the two movements and within the labour movement and shows that geographical proximity to coal infrastructure matters. The findings from South Africa can inform our understanding on the role of social movements in just energy transitions in the Global South more generally, and the extent to which narratives matter for the support or opposition of an energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104099"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500180X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates how and why stakeholders in the just energy transition in South Africa, where coal is the main source of electricity and a major export product, support or oppose a transition. Based on novel primary data collected through interviews with the environmental and labour movements in South Africa, with a special focus in Mpumalanga Province, the paper assesses the different narratives that have emerged about the just energy transition. Using an inductive coding process, the empirical analysis reveals narratives around six key themes that justify or reject just energy transition efforts: (1) climate change; (2) environmental pollution; (3) affected communities and workers; (4) energy crisis; (5) international exports; (6) just transition planning and implementation. A cluster analysis reveals differences between the two movements and within the labour movement and shows that geographical proximity to coal infrastructure matters. The findings from South Africa can inform our understanding on the role of social movements in just energy transitions in the Global South more generally, and the extent to which narratives matter for the support or opposition of an energy transition.
过渡与否?评估南非能源转型中相互矛盾的叙述
本文调查了南非能源转型中的利益相关者如何以及为什么支持或反对转型,其中煤炭是电力的主要来源和主要出口产品。基于对南非环境和劳工运动的采访收集的新颖的原始数据,特别关注姆普马兰加省,本文评估了关于公正能源转型的不同叙述。使用归纳编码过程,实证分析揭示了围绕六个关键主题的叙述,这些主题证明或拒绝能源转型努力:(1)气候变化;(2)环境污染;(3)受影响的社区和工人;(4)能源危机;(五)国际出口;(6)刚过渡的规划与实施。聚类分析揭示了两种运动之间和劳工运动内部的差异,并表明地理上靠近煤炭基础设施很重要。南非的研究结果可以让我们更广泛地了解社会运动在全球南方能源转型中的作用,以及叙事对支持或反对能源转型的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信