Prediction of soil organic carbon stock along layers and profiles using Vis-NIR laboratory spectroscopy

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Dharumarajan , C. Gomez , C.G. Kusuma , R. Vasundhara , B. Kalaiselvi , M. Lalitha , R. Hegde
{"title":"Prediction of soil organic carbon stock along layers and profiles using Vis-NIR laboratory spectroscopy","authors":"S. Dharumarajan ,&nbsp;C. Gomez ,&nbsp;C.G. Kusuma ,&nbsp;R. Vasundhara ,&nbsp;B. Kalaiselvi ,&nbsp;M. Lalitha ,&nbsp;R. Hegde","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a growing need to estimate soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks at both local and global scales. This study explores the use of Visible–Near Infrared (Vis-NIR) laboratory spectroscopy as an alternative to traditional wet chemistry methods for SOC stock estimation. Two approaches were tested: an indirect method, which uses Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) models to predict SOC content and bulk density separately and then multiplies them by measured layer depth; and a direct method, where PLSR models predict SOC stock per layer directly. The estimates were then aggregated to calculate the total SOC stock per profile. We evaluated both approaches using 361 samples from 84 soil profiles collected across three villages in Kerala, India. Two calibration scenarios were tested: (i) non-clustering, where 75 % of the dataset was used for calibration and 25 % for validation, and (ii) clustering, where models were trained on samples from two villages and validated on the third. The results showed that the indirect approach consistently outperformed the direct approach, both at the layer and profile scale. The non-clustering calibration scenario provided variable accuracy, with R2<sub>val</sub> values ranging from 0.52 (direct approach) to 0.70 (indirect approach). The clustering scenario produced more variable results depending on the calibration set used. Overall, this study confirms that Vis-NIR spectroscopy is a promising, rapid, non-destructive, and cost-effective method for SOC stock estimation. However, scaling up its application across agricultural landscapes will require substantial data collection and further methodological refinement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109150"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225004527","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing need to estimate soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks at both local and global scales. This study explores the use of Visible–Near Infrared (Vis-NIR) laboratory spectroscopy as an alternative to traditional wet chemistry methods for SOC stock estimation. Two approaches were tested: an indirect method, which uses Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) models to predict SOC content and bulk density separately and then multiplies them by measured layer depth; and a direct method, where PLSR models predict SOC stock per layer directly. The estimates were then aggregated to calculate the total SOC stock per profile. We evaluated both approaches using 361 samples from 84 soil profiles collected across three villages in Kerala, India. Two calibration scenarios were tested: (i) non-clustering, where 75 % of the dataset was used for calibration and 25 % for validation, and (ii) clustering, where models were trained on samples from two villages and validated on the third. The results showed that the indirect approach consistently outperformed the direct approach, both at the layer and profile scale. The non-clustering calibration scenario provided variable accuracy, with R2val values ranging from 0.52 (direct approach) to 0.70 (indirect approach). The clustering scenario produced more variable results depending on the calibration set used. Overall, this study confirms that Vis-NIR spectroscopy is a promising, rapid, non-destructive, and cost-effective method for SOC stock estimation. However, scaling up its application across agricultural landscapes will require substantial data collection and further methodological refinement.
利用Vis-NIR实验室光谱学预测土壤有机碳储量
在地方和全球尺度上估算土壤有机碳储量的需求日益增加。本研究探讨了使用可见光-近红外(Vis-NIR)实验室光谱学作为传统湿化学方法的替代方法来估算有机碳储量。测试了两种方法:一种是间接方法,使用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)模型分别预测有机碳含量和容重,然后将它们乘以测量的层深;另一种是直接方法,即PLSR模型直接预测每层SOC库存。然后将估计值汇总以计算每个剖面的总SOC存量。我们使用来自印度喀拉拉邦三个村庄的84个土壤剖面的361个样本对这两种方法进行了评估。测试了两种校准方案:(i)非聚类,其中75%的数据集用于校准,25%用于验证;(ii)聚类,其中模型在两个村庄的样本上进行训练,并在第三个村庄进行验证。结果表明,无论是在层和剖面尺度上,间接方法都优于直接方法。非聚类校准场景提供可变精度,R2val值在0.52(直接方法)到0.70(间接方法)之间。聚类场景根据所使用的校准集产生更多可变结果。总的来说,本研究证实了可见光-近红外光谱法是一种有前途的、快速的、非破坏性的、具有成本效益的SOC库存估计方法。然而,扩大其在农业景观中的应用将需要大量的数据收集和进一步的方法改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信