Dynamics of COVID-malaria co-infection with optimal control and cost-effectiveness analysis

Q1 Mathematics
Shikha Saha , Amit Kumar Saha , Chandra Nath Podder
{"title":"Dynamics of COVID-malaria co-infection with optimal control and cost-effectiveness analysis","authors":"Shikha Saha ,&nbsp;Amit Kumar Saha ,&nbsp;Chandra Nath Podder","doi":"10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the geographic overlap between the distributions of COVID-19 and malaria, co-infection between these diseases is highly possible and could result in severe health issues. To understand the disease dynamics of the co-infection, a new mathematical model, which incorporates vaccination as an intervention, is formulated. Theoretical analysis suggests that both the sub-models (COVID-19-only and malaria-only sub-models) and the full model undergo backward bifurcation when their respective reproduction number is less than unity. It further suggests that in the absence of re-infection both the sub-models and the full model have a globally asymptotically stable disease free equilibrium whenever the corresponding reproduction number is less than unity. The study further reveals that malaria infection may increase the risk of COVID-19, whereas COVID-19 infection may not always increase the risk of malaria. Numerical simulation also suggests that COVID-19 fatality rate increases by approximately 5 folds due to co-infection with malaria while co-infection with COVID-19 may not have significant effect on malaria fatality rate. It again shows that malaria cases can be reduced by approximately 60% if 90% individuals use non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as nets and repellents of 90% efficacy. Using the expression of the vaccine-induced herd immunity threshold and contour plot it is shown that at least 75% individuals should be vaccinated with a vaccine of 85% efficacy to achieve herd immunity against malaria. The study also shows that strategy C (prevention strategy for both COVID-19 and malaria) is the most cost-effective strategy to mitigate the burden of co-infection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34531,"journal":{"name":"Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 101217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666818125001445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the geographic overlap between the distributions of COVID-19 and malaria, co-infection between these diseases is highly possible and could result in severe health issues. To understand the disease dynamics of the co-infection, a new mathematical model, which incorporates vaccination as an intervention, is formulated. Theoretical analysis suggests that both the sub-models (COVID-19-only and malaria-only sub-models) and the full model undergo backward bifurcation when their respective reproduction number is less than unity. It further suggests that in the absence of re-infection both the sub-models and the full model have a globally asymptotically stable disease free equilibrium whenever the corresponding reproduction number is less than unity. The study further reveals that malaria infection may increase the risk of COVID-19, whereas COVID-19 infection may not always increase the risk of malaria. Numerical simulation also suggests that COVID-19 fatality rate increases by approximately 5 folds due to co-infection with malaria while co-infection with COVID-19 may not have significant effect on malaria fatality rate. It again shows that malaria cases can be reduced by approximately 60% if 90% individuals use non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as nets and repellents of 90% efficacy. Using the expression of the vaccine-induced herd immunity threshold and contour plot it is shown that at least 75% individuals should be vaccinated with a vaccine of 85% efficacy to achieve herd immunity against malaria. The study also shows that strategy C (prevention strategy for both COVID-19 and malaria) is the most cost-effective strategy to mitigate the burden of co-infection.
基于最优控制和成本-效果分析的covid -疟疾合并感染动态
由于COVID-19和疟疾分布在地理上重叠,这两种疾病很可能同时感染,并可能导致严重的健康问题。为了了解合并感染的疾病动力学,制定了一个新的数学模型,其中纳入了疫苗接种作为干预措施。理论分析表明,当各自的繁殖数小于1时,子模型(仅covid -19子模型和仅疟疾子模型)和完整模型都发生后向分叉。进一步表明,在没有再感染的情况下,当相应的繁殖数小于1时,子模型和完整模型都具有全局渐近稳定的无病平衡。该研究进一步表明,疟疾感染可能会增加COVID-19的风险,而COVID-19感染可能并不总是会增加疟疾的风险。数值模拟还表明,由于合并感染疟疾,COVID-19的死亡率增加了约5倍,而合并感染COVID-19可能对疟疾死亡率没有显著影响。报告再次表明,如果90%的人使用非药物干预措施(npi),例如效能为90%的蚊帐和驱蚊剂,疟疾病例可减少约60%。利用疫苗诱导群体免疫阈值和等高线图的表达表明,要实现疟疾群体免疫,至少需要75%的个体接种效力为85%的疫苗。研究还表明,战略C(同时预防COVID-19和疟疾的战略)是减轻合并感染负担的最具成本效益的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信