Practice recommendations for contextualizing explanations of headache pain within a biopsychosocial model

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amy C. Lang , Eva C. Igler , Nina G. Linneman , Chasity T. Brimeyer , Amy L. Drendel , W. Hobart Davies
{"title":"Practice recommendations for contextualizing explanations of headache pain within a biopsychosocial model","authors":"Amy C. Lang ,&nbsp;Eva C. Igler ,&nbsp;Nina G. Linneman ,&nbsp;Chasity T. Brimeyer ,&nbsp;Amy L. Drendel ,&nbsp;W. Hobart Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.109175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The current study aimed to identify non-dismissive language and synthesize practice recommendations for medical providers to use when discussing potential psychological etiologies of chronic pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Community-recruited emerging adults (18- to 25-year-olds; <em>N</em> = 138; 68 % female) participated in the current study as part of a larger online survey. Participants were randomly assigned to read either a “dismissive” (i.e., attributed pain to primarily psychological etiologies) or “biopsychosocial” (i.e., provided a more nuanced explanation of the complex interplay between psychological and physiological etiologies of pain) vignette describing hypothetical patient-provider interactions regarding -chronic daily headache complaints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants who read the biopsychosocial vignette and male participants reported significantly more positive reactions (e.g., more satisfaction, higher likelihood of continued care). Qualitative results showed that participants who read the dismissive vignette were more likely to feel their time had been wasted and obligated to explain their pain further.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hypothetical provider explanations of psychological etiologies of chronic daily headache pain were received more positively when contextualized within a biopsychosocial framework.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>This article presents practice recommendations for how medical providers should introduce potential psychological etiologies of a patient’s headache pain experience in a non-dismissive manner to decrease the likelihood of provider-generated pain dismissal experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 109175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125005427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The current study aimed to identify non-dismissive language and synthesize practice recommendations for medical providers to use when discussing potential psychological etiologies of chronic pain.

Methods

Community-recruited emerging adults (18- to 25-year-olds; N = 138; 68 % female) participated in the current study as part of a larger online survey. Participants were randomly assigned to read either a “dismissive” (i.e., attributed pain to primarily psychological etiologies) or “biopsychosocial” (i.e., provided a more nuanced explanation of the complex interplay between psychological and physiological etiologies of pain) vignette describing hypothetical patient-provider interactions regarding -chronic daily headache complaints.

Results

Participants who read the biopsychosocial vignette and male participants reported significantly more positive reactions (e.g., more satisfaction, higher likelihood of continued care). Qualitative results showed that participants who read the dismissive vignette were more likely to feel their time had been wasted and obligated to explain their pain further.

Conclusions

Hypothetical provider explanations of psychological etiologies of chronic daily headache pain were received more positively when contextualized within a biopsychosocial framework.

Practice implications

This article presents practice recommendations for how medical providers should introduce potential psychological etiologies of a patient’s headache pain experience in a non-dismissive manner to decrease the likelihood of provider-generated pain dismissal experiences.
在生物心理社会模型中解释头痛的实践建议
目的本研究旨在确定非轻蔑的语言和综合实践建议,供医疗提供者在讨论慢性疼痛的潜在心理病因时使用。方法:社区招募新生成人(18- 25岁;N = 138;68 %女性)参与了目前的研究,作为一个更大的在线调查的一部分。参与者被随机分配阅读“不屑一顾”(即,将疼痛主要归因于心理病因)或“生物心理社会”(即,提供更细致的解释疼痛的心理和生理病因之间复杂的相互作用)小短文,描述关于慢性每日头痛主诉的假想患者-提供者互动。结果阅读生物心理社会小插图的参与者和男性参与者报告了更多的积极反应(例如,更多的满意度,更高的继续护理的可能性)。定性结果显示,读了轻蔑小插图的参与者更有可能觉得自己的时间被浪费了,有义务进一步解释自己的痛苦。结论:在生物-心理-社会框架下,对慢性日常头痛的心理病因的假设提供者解释更能得到积极的接受。实践意义本文提出了医疗服务提供者应如何以非轻视的方式介绍患者头痛经验的潜在心理病因,以减少提供者产生的疼痛忽视经验的可能性的实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信