Beneath the Bun: Food additives in fast-food burgers and the path to healthier choices

Darislav Besedin , Sharayah Carter , Rohan Shah , Thi Thu Hao Van , Rajaraman Eri
{"title":"Beneath the Bun: Food additives in fast-food burgers and the path to healthier choices","authors":"Darislav Besedin ,&nbsp;Sharayah Carter ,&nbsp;Rohan Shah ,&nbsp;Thi Thu Hao Van ,&nbsp;Rajaraman Eri","doi":"10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The modern Western diet is dominated by ultra-processed food (UPF), which is increasingly linked to adverse health outcomes. Previous reviews have already identified problematic components of UPF, such as added fats and sugars. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide a nuanced understanding of another ubiquitous component of UPF, food additives, and to explore any potential health risks associated with their consumption, as well as strategies for mitigating those risks. To provide real-world contextualization, we first quantified the food additive profile a person would be exposed to when consuming a popular UPF, the burger. Here we show that the selected burgers contain up to thirty-six different additives, primarily emulsifiers, thickeners, preservatives, and colours. While some reviewed additives, such as resistant starch and natural colours, have beneficial effects, the majority have a deleterious effect on health. However, limitations of current studies and gaps in government regulations complicate the assessment of the long-term health implications of a diet high in food additives. This review underscores the need for greater transparency in food labelling and a re-evaluation of food additive safety standards. It advocates for both elimination of certain food additives and reformulation strategies to mitigate potential health risks associated with UPF consumption. However, since elimination poses multiple challenges, reformulation may be a more realistic strategy. This could include fortification with fibre, replacing synthetic colours with natural colours, and reducing the use of preservatives by utilising advancements in hurdle technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100543,"journal":{"name":"Food and Humanity","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Humanity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949824425001508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modern Western diet is dominated by ultra-processed food (UPF), which is increasingly linked to adverse health outcomes. Previous reviews have already identified problematic components of UPF, such as added fats and sugars. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide a nuanced understanding of another ubiquitous component of UPF, food additives, and to explore any potential health risks associated with their consumption, as well as strategies for mitigating those risks. To provide real-world contextualization, we first quantified the food additive profile a person would be exposed to when consuming a popular UPF, the burger. Here we show that the selected burgers contain up to thirty-six different additives, primarily emulsifiers, thickeners, preservatives, and colours. While some reviewed additives, such as resistant starch and natural colours, have beneficial effects, the majority have a deleterious effect on health. However, limitations of current studies and gaps in government regulations complicate the assessment of the long-term health implications of a diet high in food additives. This review underscores the need for greater transparency in food labelling and a re-evaluation of food additive safety standards. It advocates for both elimination of certain food additives and reformulation strategies to mitigate potential health risks associated with UPF consumption. However, since elimination poses multiple challenges, reformulation may be a more realistic strategy. This could include fortification with fibre, replacing synthetic colours with natural colours, and reducing the use of preservatives by utilising advancements in hurdle technology.
在面包下面:快餐汉堡中的食品添加剂和通往更健康选择的道路
现代西方饮食以超加工食品(UPF)为主,这与不良健康结果的联系越来越紧密。以前的评论已经发现了UPF的问题成分,如添加脂肪和糖。因此,本综述的目的是对UPF中另一个普遍存在的成分——食品添加剂——提供细致入微的了解,并探讨与食用它们相关的任何潜在健康风险,以及减轻这些风险的策略。为了提供现实世界的背景,我们首先量化了一个人在消费一种受欢迎的UPF(汉堡)时可能接触到的食品添加剂。这里我们展示了选定的汉堡含有多达36种不同的添加剂,主要是乳化剂、增稠剂、防腐剂和色素。虽然一些经过审查的添加剂,如抗性淀粉和天然色素,有有益的作用,但大多数对健康有害。然而,目前研究的局限性和政府法规的空白使对高食品添加剂饮食对健康的长期影响的评估复杂化。这项审查强调了提高食品标签透明度和重新评估食品添加剂安全标准的必要性。它倡导消除某些食品添加剂并重新制定战略,以减轻与UPF消费相关的潜在健康风险。然而,由于消除会带来多重挑战,重新制定可能是一种更现实的战略。这可能包括用纤维强化,用天然色素代替合成色素,以及通过利用跨栏技术的进步减少防腐剂的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信