Psychometric properties of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT) scale: Extending validity research to a French population

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jessica Spencer , Marie-Paule Gustin , Royce Anders , Mélinée Chapoutot , Wendy Leslie , Benjamin Schoendorff , Nima Golijani-Moghaddam , David L. Dawson , Laure Peter-Derex , Benjamin Putois
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT) scale: Extending validity research to a French population","authors":"Jessica Spencer ,&nbsp;Marie-Paule Gustin ,&nbsp;Royce Anders ,&nbsp;Mélinée Chapoutot ,&nbsp;Wendy Leslie ,&nbsp;Benjamin Schoendorff ,&nbsp;Nima Golijani-Moghaddam ,&nbsp;David L. Dawson ,&nbsp;Laure Peter-Derex ,&nbsp;Benjamin Putois","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2025.100532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Prior research has identified that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may notably improve psychological flexibility. Despite its recognized effectiveness, French therapists and clinical researchers still lack the appropriate instruments to assess important parameters of ACT. For example, a previous standard in French, the AAQ-II, omits crucial variables that would fully represent ACT processes. In contrast, the CompACT scale, which encompasses the ensemble of ACT processes, through three dyadic processes (Openness to Experience, Behavioral Awareness, Valuation of Action), exhibits better suitability but lacks an empirically-validated adaptation in French. Therefore, this study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the CompACT scale in French, focusing on both the general population and benzodiazepine users, the latter’s long-term use illustrates experiential avoidance, making them a highly relevant, alternative population for studying ACT processes. Statistical comparisons of these populations may be used to bring valuable insights and assess the scale’s construct validity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The CompACT scale was translated and counter-translated by experts. An intermediate version was pre-tested by 34 participants, leading to the final version for psychometric validation with 423 French speakers (269 benzodiazepine users, 154 general population). The study evaluated structure, reliability, and various validities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The French CompACT showed strong psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Validating the French CompACT provides a reliable ACT process measure. This is crucial as psychological inflexibility contributes to numerous psychopathologies, making CompACT valuable for therapists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"35 3","pages":"Article 100532"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979125000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Prior research has identified that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may notably improve psychological flexibility. Despite its recognized effectiveness, French therapists and clinical researchers still lack the appropriate instruments to assess important parameters of ACT. For example, a previous standard in French, the AAQ-II, omits crucial variables that would fully represent ACT processes. In contrast, the CompACT scale, which encompasses the ensemble of ACT processes, through three dyadic processes (Openness to Experience, Behavioral Awareness, Valuation of Action), exhibits better suitability but lacks an empirically-validated adaptation in French. Therefore, this study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the CompACT scale in French, focusing on both the general population and benzodiazepine users, the latter’s long-term use illustrates experiential avoidance, making them a highly relevant, alternative population for studying ACT processes. Statistical comparisons of these populations may be used to bring valuable insights and assess the scale’s construct validity.

Method

The CompACT scale was translated and counter-translated by experts. An intermediate version was pre-tested by 34 participants, leading to the final version for psychometric validation with 423 French speakers (269 benzodiazepine users, 154 general population). The study evaluated structure, reliability, and various validities.

Results

The French CompACT showed strong psychometric properties.

Conclusion

Validating the French CompACT provides a reliable ACT process measure. This is crucial as psychological inflexibility contributes to numerous psychopathologies, making CompACT valuable for therapists.
接受和承诺治疗过程综合评估(CompACT)量表的心理测量特性:将效度研究扩展到法国人群
背景先前的研究已经发现,接受和承诺疗法(ACT)可以显著提高心理灵活性。尽管其公认的有效性,法国治疗师和临床研究人员仍然缺乏适当的工具来评估ACT的重要参数。例如,以前的法语标准AAQ-II省略了完全代表ACT过程的关键变量。相比之下,紧凑量表包含ACT过程的集合,通过三个二元过程(经验开放性,行为意识,行动评估),在法语中表现出更好的适用性,但缺乏经验验证的适应性。因此,本研究旨在翻译、调整和验证法语紧凑量表,重点关注普通人群和苯二氮卓类药物使用者,后者的长期使用说明了经验回避,使他们成为研究ACT过程的高度相关的替代人群。这些人群的统计比较可以用来带来有价值的见解和评估量表的结构效度。方法由专家对紧凑量表进行翻译和反译。中间版本由34名参与者预先测试,最终版本由423名法语使用者(269名苯二氮卓类药物使用者,154名普通人群)进行心理测量验证。该研究评估了结构、信度和各种效度。结果《法国契约》具有较强的心理测量特征。结论验证法国契约提供了一种可靠的ACT过程测量方法。这是至关重要的,因为心理上的不灵活性会导致许多精神病理学,这使得CompACT对治疗师很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信