Ending international fossil fuel finance: Lessons from the Clean Energy Transition Partnership

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Brett Morgan, Robert MacNeil
{"title":"Ending international fossil fuel finance: Lessons from the Clean Energy Transition Partnership","authors":"Brett Morgan,&nbsp;Robert MacNeil","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This brief analysis examines the Clean Energy Transition Partnership (CETP) established at COP26, which aims to end public finance for international fossil fuel projects. While the CETP has corresponded with a reduction in foreign fossil fuel investment from its signatories, we argue that the partnership maintains key shortcomings, including the continuity of massive domestic fossil fuel subsidies within wealthy signatory countries. Using Australia as the stand-out example, our analysis highlights the paradoxical nature of this situation, and concludes by advocating for the CETP to include the elimination of domestic finance in its remit to ensure a genuine commitment to a global clean energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 114694"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This brief analysis examines the Clean Energy Transition Partnership (CETP) established at COP26, which aims to end public finance for international fossil fuel projects. While the CETP has corresponded with a reduction in foreign fossil fuel investment from its signatories, we argue that the partnership maintains key shortcomings, including the continuity of massive domestic fossil fuel subsidies within wealthy signatory countries. Using Australia as the stand-out example, our analysis highlights the paradoxical nature of this situation, and concludes by advocating for the CETP to include the elimination of domestic finance in its remit to ensure a genuine commitment to a global clean energy transition.
结束国际化石燃料融资:来自清洁能源转型伙伴关系的经验教训
本文简要分析了在COP26上建立的清洁能源转型伙伴关系(CETP),该伙伴关系旨在终止国际化石燃料项目的公共融资。尽管《CETP》的签署国减少了对外国化石燃料的投资,但我们认为,该伙伴关系仍存在一些关键缺陷,包括富裕签署国持续提供大量国内化石燃料补贴。以澳大利亚为例,我们的分析强调了这种情况的矛盾性质,并主张将消除国内融资纳入CETP的职权范围,以确保对全球清洁能源转型的真正承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信