{"title":"Perceived need for treatment for mental disorders: A review and critical evaluation","authors":"Alan E. Kazdin","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mental disorders are highly prevalent worldwide. Unfortunately, most people with these disorders do not receive any treatment. This is due in part to a large set of barriers that impede treatment delivery. An initial barrier is the perception that one does not need treatment. Perceived need for treatment (PNFT) refers to whether an individual sees a need to obtain an intervention for their mental health problem. Among individuals with a mental disorder, lack of perceived need is the most common reason people give for not initiating treatment. This article describes PNFT, its characteristics, correlates, and predictors. A critical evaluation of the concept challenges key notions such as whether meeting criteria for a disorder means that someone needs treatment, whether PNFT actually is the initial obstacle limiting treatment seeking, how people may seek an intervention but do not elect mental health treatment, and that PNFT is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for entering treatment. Several research priorities are discussed including the importance of perceived need among parents and other caregivers, evaluating whether increasing the rates of PNFT would actually increase service use, the need to study the treatment needs of many neglected groups, and considering whether PNFT influences other facets of the treatment process (e.g., adherence to treatment, dropping out early) where perceiving there no longer is a mental health problem may occur.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102591"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mental disorders are highly prevalent worldwide. Unfortunately, most people with these disorders do not receive any treatment. This is due in part to a large set of barriers that impede treatment delivery. An initial barrier is the perception that one does not need treatment. Perceived need for treatment (PNFT) refers to whether an individual sees a need to obtain an intervention for their mental health problem. Among individuals with a mental disorder, lack of perceived need is the most common reason people give for not initiating treatment. This article describes PNFT, its characteristics, correlates, and predictors. A critical evaluation of the concept challenges key notions such as whether meeting criteria for a disorder means that someone needs treatment, whether PNFT actually is the initial obstacle limiting treatment seeking, how people may seek an intervention but do not elect mental health treatment, and that PNFT is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for entering treatment. Several research priorities are discussed including the importance of perceived need among parents and other caregivers, evaluating whether increasing the rates of PNFT would actually increase service use, the need to study the treatment needs of many neglected groups, and considering whether PNFT influences other facets of the treatment process (e.g., adherence to treatment, dropping out early) where perceiving there no longer is a mental health problem may occur.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.