Chuangang Fan , Guanjie Rao , Rongwei Bu , Tong Xu , Yao Huang , Yang Zhou
{"title":"Heat transfer mechanism of downward flame spread over convex and inclined flat surfaces","authors":"Chuangang Fan , Guanjie Rao , Rongwei Bu , Tong Xu , Yao Huang , Yang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Convex structures are common in buildings. However, the underlying mechanism governing downward flame spread on convex surfaces remains inadequately understood. In this study, 65 kinds of convex and flat surfaces were designed by varying curvature (denoted by <em>K</em>, 0–2.00 m<sup>−1</sup>), inclination angle (<em>θ</em>, 0–45°), and material widths (<em>W</em>, 2.5–12.5 cm). The downward flame spread behaviors on convex surfaces was then experimentally compared with that on flat surfaces. It is found that as <em>K</em> and <em>θ</em> increase, the average path flame spread rate (APFSR) decreases firstly (Stage I) and then is basically unchanged (Stage II). For convex and inclined flat surfaces, the critical conditions for the change from Stage I to II are <em>K</em> = 1.00 m<sup>−1</sup> and <em>θ</em> = 30° respectively. Moreover, APFSR on convex surfaces is higher than that on flat surfaces. A mathematical correlation is proposed to quantify the relationship between the APFSRs of convex and flat surfaces. In addition, by introducing deRis and infinite-width flame spread models, the time-varying flame spread rate of the convex surface is further discussed to analyze the heat transfer mechanisms. For <em>K</em> < 1.00 m<sup>−1</sup>, radiant heat transfer has an important contribution during the flame spread process. However, for <em>K</em> > 1.41 m<sup>−1</sup>, the flame spread process is consistent with deRis model, indicating gas-phase conduction-dominated mechanism. This study can provide a theoretical basis for fire safety design in complex curved structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 103672"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925004627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Convex structures are common in buildings. However, the underlying mechanism governing downward flame spread on convex surfaces remains inadequately understood. In this study, 65 kinds of convex and flat surfaces were designed by varying curvature (denoted by K, 0–2.00 m−1), inclination angle (θ, 0–45°), and material widths (W, 2.5–12.5 cm). The downward flame spread behaviors on convex surfaces was then experimentally compared with that on flat surfaces. It is found that as K and θ increase, the average path flame spread rate (APFSR) decreases firstly (Stage I) and then is basically unchanged (Stage II). For convex and inclined flat surfaces, the critical conditions for the change from Stage I to II are K = 1.00 m−1 and θ = 30° respectively. Moreover, APFSR on convex surfaces is higher than that on flat surfaces. A mathematical correlation is proposed to quantify the relationship between the APFSRs of convex and flat surfaces. In addition, by introducing deRis and infinite-width flame spread models, the time-varying flame spread rate of the convex surface is further discussed to analyze the heat transfer mechanisms. For K < 1.00 m−1, radiant heat transfer has an important contribution during the flame spread process. However, for K > 1.41 m−1, the flame spread process is consistent with deRis model, indicating gas-phase conduction-dominated mechanism. This study can provide a theoretical basis for fire safety design in complex curved structures.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.