Shuhong Li , Shiyao Peng , Zhenyi Liu , Yao Zhao , Mingzhi Li , Pengliang Li
{"title":"Hydrogen autoignition under varying methane blends: Experimental analysis and prediction model development","authors":"Shuhong Li , Shiyao Peng , Zhenyi Liu , Yao Zhao , Mingzhi Li , Pengliang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effects of methane volume fractions on hydrogen autoignition. Experiments are conducted on an autoignition platform with a cylindrical release tube, focusing on the impact of methane volume blending ratios (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, and 30 %) on critical autoignition pressure (<em>P</em><sub><em>cr</em></sub>), shock wave velocity, and flame morphology. Results show that methane significantly suppresses hydrogen autoignition. Under pure hydrogen conditions, the critical autoignition pressure (<em>P</em><sub><em>cr</em></sub>) is 4.44 MPa, and the average shock wave velocity is 1185.5 m/s. When 10 % methane is blended, the critical autoignition pressure (<em>P</em><sub><em>cr</em></sub>) markedly increases to 8.63 MPa (approximately twice that of pure hydrogen), while the shock wave velocity slightly increases to 1230.4 m/s. However, at 20 % and 30 % methane, autoignition is not observed even at pressures over 17 MPa. Theoretical model for shock-induced ignition is employed in combination with three commonly used reaction kinetics mechanisms: GRI 3.0, FFCM-1, and Aramco 2.0. The results indicate that the theoretical model exhibits significant deviations and is not well suited for predicting the autoignition behavior of methane-hydrogen mixtures. A GRNN model is developed by integrating experimental and literature data, achieving 72.55 % accuracy at low methane blending ratios, outperforming conventional models. This GRNN model provides a new approach for predicting autoignition criteria in methane-hydrogen mixtures, offering insights for safe discharge and storage tank design in industrial processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107245"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025005129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of methane volume fractions on hydrogen autoignition. Experiments are conducted on an autoignition platform with a cylindrical release tube, focusing on the impact of methane volume blending ratios (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, and 30 %) on critical autoignition pressure (Pcr), shock wave velocity, and flame morphology. Results show that methane significantly suppresses hydrogen autoignition. Under pure hydrogen conditions, the critical autoignition pressure (Pcr) is 4.44 MPa, and the average shock wave velocity is 1185.5 m/s. When 10 % methane is blended, the critical autoignition pressure (Pcr) markedly increases to 8.63 MPa (approximately twice that of pure hydrogen), while the shock wave velocity slightly increases to 1230.4 m/s. However, at 20 % and 30 % methane, autoignition is not observed even at pressures over 17 MPa. Theoretical model for shock-induced ignition is employed in combination with three commonly used reaction kinetics mechanisms: GRI 3.0, FFCM-1, and Aramco 2.0. The results indicate that the theoretical model exhibits significant deviations and is not well suited for predicting the autoignition behavior of methane-hydrogen mixtures. A GRNN model is developed by integrating experimental and literature data, achieving 72.55 % accuracy at low methane blending ratios, outperforming conventional models. This GRNN model provides a new approach for predicting autoignition criteria in methane-hydrogen mixtures, offering insights for safe discharge and storage tank design in industrial processes.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.