Comparative analysis of machine learning and conventional methods for waste generation forecasting

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Abdulrahman Abdeljaber , Sara Al Smadi , Manar Abu Talib , Mohamed Abdallah
{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning and conventional methods for waste generation forecasting","authors":"Abdulrahman Abdeljaber ,&nbsp;Sara Al Smadi ,&nbsp;Manar Abu Talib ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdallah","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.100992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating complexity of waste management systems, driven by rapid environmental and socio-economic shifts, necessitates the development of robust multi-parameter waste generation prediction models. Conventional forecasting methods such as system dynamics, time series, and linear regression have been widely utilized; however, they often fail to fully capture the nuanced dynamics of waste generation, which is influenced by various seasonal and demographic factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) models have emerged as alternative predictors that perform advanced computational techniques to generate accurate forecasts. Despite the extensive research conducted, few review articles have assessed the feasibility of utilizing multiple prediction methods for different waste streams. None has comprehensively assessed and compared the various prediction methods for different waste streams. This review summarizes and analyzes the prediction methodologies implemented for different waste types. This systematic literature review compiles 119 articles from 2000 to 2024. A thorough analysis of AI-based models and a summary of the most influential explanatory variables were provided. The review indicates a predominant focus on municipal waste, with considerable gaps in the forecasting of construction and medical waste streams. System dynamics models were found to excel in strategic waste management planning but can be complex to calibrate and validate. Time series and regression analyses, while useful for identifying trends and relationships, often failed to adapt to rapid or unpredictable changes. Alternatively, machine learning algorithms offer robust capabilities for modeling complex and nonlinear data, although they require substantial data quality and are prone to overfitting. It is concluded that a combined hybrid approach is recommended, leveraging the strengths of different methods to provide more accurate waste generation forecasts. The critical analyses presented can offer insights to decision-makers in the waste management sector by providing key aspects concerning the efficiency and limitations of these predictors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100992"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825001156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The escalating complexity of waste management systems, driven by rapid environmental and socio-economic shifts, necessitates the development of robust multi-parameter waste generation prediction models. Conventional forecasting methods such as system dynamics, time series, and linear regression have been widely utilized; however, they often fail to fully capture the nuanced dynamics of waste generation, which is influenced by various seasonal and demographic factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) models have emerged as alternative predictors that perform advanced computational techniques to generate accurate forecasts. Despite the extensive research conducted, few review articles have assessed the feasibility of utilizing multiple prediction methods for different waste streams. None has comprehensively assessed and compared the various prediction methods for different waste streams. This review summarizes and analyzes the prediction methodologies implemented for different waste types. This systematic literature review compiles 119 articles from 2000 to 2024. A thorough analysis of AI-based models and a summary of the most influential explanatory variables were provided. The review indicates a predominant focus on municipal waste, with considerable gaps in the forecasting of construction and medical waste streams. System dynamics models were found to excel in strategic waste management planning but can be complex to calibrate and validate. Time series and regression analyses, while useful for identifying trends and relationships, often failed to adapt to rapid or unpredictable changes. Alternatively, machine learning algorithms offer robust capabilities for modeling complex and nonlinear data, although they require substantial data quality and are prone to overfitting. It is concluded that a combined hybrid approach is recommended, leveraging the strengths of different methods to provide more accurate waste generation forecasts. The critical analyses presented can offer insights to decision-makers in the waste management sector by providing key aspects concerning the efficiency and limitations of these predictors.
机器学习与传统废物生成预测方法的比较分析
由于环境和社会经济的迅速变化,废物管理系统的复杂性日益增加,因此有必要开发可靠的多参数废物产生预测模型。传统的预测方法如系统动力学、时间序列和线性回归等已得到广泛应用;然而,它们往往不能充分捕捉到废物产生的细微动态,这受到各种季节和人口因素的影响。人工智能(AI)模型已经成为替代预测器,可以使用先进的计算技术来生成准确的预测。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但很少有综述文章评估对不同废物流使用多种预测方法的可行性。没有一项研究全面评估和比较针对不同废物流的各种预测方法。本文总结和分析了针对不同废物类型实施的预测方法。本系统文献综述收录了2000年至2024年的119篇文献。对基于人工智能的模型进行了深入分析,并总结了最具影响力的解释变量。审查表明,主要侧重于城市废物,在建筑和医疗废物流的预测方面存在相当大的差距。研究发现,系统动力学模型在战略性废物管理规划方面表现优异,但校准和验证可能比较复杂。时间序列和回归分析虽然有助于确定趋势和关系,但往往不能适应快速或不可预测的变化。另外,机器学习算法为复杂和非线性数据的建模提供了强大的能力,尽管它们需要大量的数据质量并且容易过拟合。结论是,建议采用综合混合方法,利用不同方法的优势,提供更准确的废物产生预测。所提出的关键分析可以通过提供有关这些预测器的效率和局限性的关键方面,为废物管理部门的决策者提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信