{"title":"Correlation of collagen damage and failure mechanics in porcine pia-arachnoid complex","authors":"Emma Luke , Brittany Coats","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for approximately 75% of all TBI cases, and the mechanisms are still poorly understood, in part due to limitations of current diagnostic tools. Yet, there is a critical need to detect the presence of mTBI to mitigate risk of further injury. In this study, we explore the potential of collagen hybridizing peptides (CHPs), which selectively bind to damaged collagen, to detect damage in the pia-arachnoid complex (PAC), a major load-transferring interface during head trauma. To generate damage, porcine PAC samples underwent peel tests. Peak force to failure and CHP fluorescence were measured in three regions of the brain at multiple post-mortem times. The peak force of PAC failure was region-specific, with increasing failure forces moving anterior to posterior (frontal: 20.91 ± 38.77 mN; parietal: 64.72 ± 33.31 mN; occipital: 86.68 ± 43.46 mN) and significantly different between frontal and occipital regions (p = 0.034). CHP fluorescence was significantly different between control and peeled PAC samples in mean pixel intensity (MPI; p = 0.031), median pixel intensity (MedPI; p = 0.009), and percent pixels above a defined threshold (PP; p = 0.014). Each of these CHP fluorescence metrics were significantly and positively correlated with peak force at failure (MPI: p = 0.049; MedPI: p = 0.026; PP: p = 0.002). These data suggest CHP is a viable solution to detecting the presence and severity of damage at the brain-skull interface, and may be a useful tool for quantifying damage in vivo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 112745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500257X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for approximately 75% of all TBI cases, and the mechanisms are still poorly understood, in part due to limitations of current diagnostic tools. Yet, there is a critical need to detect the presence of mTBI to mitigate risk of further injury. In this study, we explore the potential of collagen hybridizing peptides (CHPs), which selectively bind to damaged collagen, to detect damage in the pia-arachnoid complex (PAC), a major load-transferring interface during head trauma. To generate damage, porcine PAC samples underwent peel tests. Peak force to failure and CHP fluorescence were measured in three regions of the brain at multiple post-mortem times. The peak force of PAC failure was region-specific, with increasing failure forces moving anterior to posterior (frontal: 20.91 ± 38.77 mN; parietal: 64.72 ± 33.31 mN; occipital: 86.68 ± 43.46 mN) and significantly different between frontal and occipital regions (p = 0.034). CHP fluorescence was significantly different between control and peeled PAC samples in mean pixel intensity (MPI; p = 0.031), median pixel intensity (MedPI; p = 0.009), and percent pixels above a defined threshold (PP; p = 0.014). Each of these CHP fluorescence metrics were significantly and positively correlated with peak force at failure (MPI: p = 0.049; MedPI: p = 0.026; PP: p = 0.002). These data suggest CHP is a viable solution to detecting the presence and severity of damage at the brain-skull interface, and may be a useful tool for quantifying damage in vivo.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.