{"title":"Is banks’ ESG disclosure associated with financial depth and economic growth? Evidence from the Visegrad Four countries","authors":"Gabriella Lamanda , Zsuzsanna Vőneki Tamásné","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper explores the relationship between financial depth, economic growth and banks’ ESG performance, examining the evolution of sustainability disclosures. While sustainability considerations are becoming more widespread in the financial sector, the connection between ESG performance and financial depth remains inadequately explored. This highlights the importance of investigating and understanding the interaction between these factors, as such an analysis would provide significant value to market participants. The study analyses sustainability-related reports disclosed by 26 banks operating in the Central European region (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) covering the 2017–2023 period, in response to increasing regulatory expectations. The research uses content analysis methodology to create a specific ESG Disclosure index and panel regression to enhance the robustness of our findings.</div><div>The results show that banks have significantly improved their sustainability disclosures, although the establishment of ESG risk management framework has not progressed sufficiently. The findings reveal a significant negative relationship between ESG performance and financial depth, underscoring the potential trade-off between sustainability efforts and financial system expansion. This suggests that achieving net-zero economy by 2050 may require more robust regulatory interventions to reconcile these dynamics. Furthermore, the positive relationship between economic growth and ESG performance highlights the pivotal role of financial institutions not only in driving growth but also in supporting sustainability initiatives. These results highlight the need for a more integrated approach that aligns financial stability with long-term environmental and social goals<strong>.</strong> The findings urge regulators to improve sustainability disclosures and develop more comprehensive regulations for a sustainable future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper explores the relationship between financial depth, economic growth and banks’ ESG performance, examining the evolution of sustainability disclosures. While sustainability considerations are becoming more widespread in the financial sector, the connection between ESG performance and financial depth remains inadequately explored. This highlights the importance of investigating and understanding the interaction between these factors, as such an analysis would provide significant value to market participants. The study analyses sustainability-related reports disclosed by 26 banks operating in the Central European region (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) covering the 2017–2023 period, in response to increasing regulatory expectations. The research uses content analysis methodology to create a specific ESG Disclosure index and panel regression to enhance the robustness of our findings.
The results show that banks have significantly improved their sustainability disclosures, although the establishment of ESG risk management framework has not progressed sufficiently. The findings reveal a significant negative relationship between ESG performance and financial depth, underscoring the potential trade-off between sustainability efforts and financial system expansion. This suggests that achieving net-zero economy by 2050 may require more robust regulatory interventions to reconcile these dynamics. Furthermore, the positive relationship between economic growth and ESG performance highlights the pivotal role of financial institutions not only in driving growth but also in supporting sustainability initiatives. These results highlight the need for a more integrated approach that aligns financial stability with long-term environmental and social goals. The findings urge regulators to improve sustainability disclosures and develop more comprehensive regulations for a sustainable future.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.