Nathaniel A. Gomez, Daniel Blumel, Davies Dueñas, Bronson Young, Matt Hazel, Ming Yu
{"title":"Influence of experimental conditions on the adsorption of disease biomarker proteins to InP/ZnS quantum dots","authors":"Nathaniel A. Gomez, Daniel Blumel, Davies Dueñas, Bronson Young, Matt Hazel, Ming Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2025.115903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The spontaneous formation of quantum dot (QD)-protein assemblies in the physiological environment exhibits challenges or benefits for nanomedicine applications. In this study, we investigated the QD-protein assemblies spontaneously formed with the greener water soluble InP/ZnS–COOH QDs and isolated disease biomarker proteins under various environmental conditions, including QDs size, solution pH, incubation time, ionic strength, different salts, as well as the lowest concentrations of the proteins that started the formation of detectable assemblies. It was shown that higher ionic strength or valence charge disrupted the assembly's formation. The basic pH 8.5 facilitated the formation to a greater extent than the pH 7.4 did. The heat shock protein 90-alpha (HSP90α) adsorbed on QDs surface more readily than cytochrome C (CytoC) and lysozyme (Lyz) in the basic environment. Among the three-sized QDs compared, the medium-sized QDs were the most effective in promoting the assemblies' formation. The detectable assemblies started at as low as 0.4 ng/mL of CytoC, 1.0 ng/mL of HSP90α, or 1.8 ng/mL of Lyz, respectively. The findings add insights into how the biomarker proteins interacted with the QDs under different environmental conditions, which promotes the understanding of QD-protein assemblies' collaborative behaviors when they facilitate bioimaging and biomedicine applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"704 ","pages":"Article 115903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269725001411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The spontaneous formation of quantum dot (QD)-protein assemblies in the physiological environment exhibits challenges or benefits for nanomedicine applications. In this study, we investigated the QD-protein assemblies spontaneously formed with the greener water soluble InP/ZnS–COOH QDs and isolated disease biomarker proteins under various environmental conditions, including QDs size, solution pH, incubation time, ionic strength, different salts, as well as the lowest concentrations of the proteins that started the formation of detectable assemblies. It was shown that higher ionic strength or valence charge disrupted the assembly's formation. The basic pH 8.5 facilitated the formation to a greater extent than the pH 7.4 did. The heat shock protein 90-alpha (HSP90α) adsorbed on QDs surface more readily than cytochrome C (CytoC) and lysozyme (Lyz) in the basic environment. Among the three-sized QDs compared, the medium-sized QDs were the most effective in promoting the assemblies' formation. The detectable assemblies started at as low as 0.4 ng/mL of CytoC, 1.0 ng/mL of HSP90α, or 1.8 ng/mL of Lyz, respectively. The findings add insights into how the biomarker proteins interacted with the QDs under different environmental conditions, which promotes the understanding of QD-protein assemblies' collaborative behaviors when they facilitate bioimaging and biomedicine applications.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.