Managing occupancy density and ventilation strategies for mitigating airborne transmission during pandemics by using infection risk model

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Pitchaporn Prapinsri , Siwaporn Boonyasuppayakorn , Saran Salakij
{"title":"Managing occupancy density and ventilation strategies for mitigating airborne transmission during pandemics by using infection risk model","authors":"Pitchaporn Prapinsri ,&nbsp;Siwaporn Boonyasuppayakorn ,&nbsp;Saran Salakij","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During pandemics, the infection risk model can serve as a tool for optimizing the occupancy density, ventilation rates, and preventive measures to reduce airborne transmissions by controlling the environment reduces infection risk for occupants. This study introduces a novel model designed for real-time, iterative control of airborne transmission risk. The model uniquely integrates mask efficiency, social distancing, and dynamic ventilation, achieving a low average deviation of 10.78 % from actual airborne transmission data across 11 scenarios. Case studies of controlling COVID-19 in office, restaurant, and bar settings demonstrate the model's application in determining (a) optimal occupancy with limited ventilation and (b) ventilation rates needed for desired occupancy. With a limited ventilation rate based on ASHRAE 62.1 standards, the allowed occupancy density is much less than the designed value. Also, it is further decreased as the duration of time spent indoors increases. Wearing face masks also allows for increased occupancy density with percentage increases ranging from 51.52 % to 800.00 %. Instead of limiting the number of people in an area, to achieve the desired occupancy while maintaining an acceptable infection risk, the ventilation rates must be greatly increased up to 3904 % for non-wearing face mask cases compared with the standard ventilation rates. By wearing face masks, the required ventilation rates can be reduced by 5.67 times. Furthermore, the model shows that dynamically adjusting ventilation based on occupancy can reduce energy consumption by approximately 70 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 113168"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325006481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During pandemics, the infection risk model can serve as a tool for optimizing the occupancy density, ventilation rates, and preventive measures to reduce airborne transmissions by controlling the environment reduces infection risk for occupants. This study introduces a novel model designed for real-time, iterative control of airborne transmission risk. The model uniquely integrates mask efficiency, social distancing, and dynamic ventilation, achieving a low average deviation of 10.78 % from actual airborne transmission data across 11 scenarios. Case studies of controlling COVID-19 in office, restaurant, and bar settings demonstrate the model's application in determining (a) optimal occupancy with limited ventilation and (b) ventilation rates needed for desired occupancy. With a limited ventilation rate based on ASHRAE 62.1 standards, the allowed occupancy density is much less than the designed value. Also, it is further decreased as the duration of time spent indoors increases. Wearing face masks also allows for increased occupancy density with percentage increases ranging from 51.52 % to 800.00 %. Instead of limiting the number of people in an area, to achieve the desired occupancy while maintaining an acceptable infection risk, the ventilation rates must be greatly increased up to 3904 % for non-wearing face mask cases compared with the standard ventilation rates. By wearing face masks, the required ventilation rates can be reduced by 5.67 times. Furthermore, the model shows that dynamically adjusting ventilation based on occupancy can reduce energy consumption by approximately 70 %.
利用感染风险模型管理大流行期间减少空气传播的占用密度和通风策略
在大流行期间,感染风险模型可以作为优化占用密度、通风率和预防措施的工具,通过控制环境来减少空气传播,降低占用者的感染风险。本文提出了一种用于实时、迭代控制空气传播风险的新模型。该模型独特地集成了口罩效率、社交距离和动态通风,在11种情况下与实际机载传播数据的平均偏差低至10.78%。在办公室、餐厅和酒吧环境中控制COVID-19的案例研究证明了该模型在确定(a)有限通风条件下的最佳入住率和(b)理想入住率所需的通风率方面的应用。在ASHRAE 62.1标准限制通风量的情况下,允许的占用密度远小于设计值。此外,随着室内时间的增加,它会进一步减少。戴口罩还可以增加人员密度,增加的百分比从51.52%到800.00%不等。为了在保持可接受的感染风险的同时达到预期的占用率,而不是限制一个区域的人数,与标准通风率相比,非戴口罩病例的通风率必须大大提高到3904%。通过佩戴口罩,所需通风量可减少5.67倍。此外,该模型表明,根据占用情况动态调节通风可以减少约70%的能源消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信