Prison Vaccination in a pandemic: Geographic disparities and policy insights

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Alexes Merritt, Shweta Bansal
{"title":"Prison Vaccination in a pandemic: Geographic disparities and policy insights","authors":"Alexes Merritt,&nbsp;Shweta Bansal","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, carceral communities suffered disproportionate impacts across multiple health indicators despite numerous protective measures. As the COVID-19 vaccination campaign began in 2021, many states introduced plans and policies, including prioritization, decarceration, and incentivization, that could increase the vaccination coverage of these vulnerable communities and protect them from further spread. Here, we analyze the geographic distribution of COVID-19 vaccination coverage among incarcerated populations and assess the impact of implemented policies on this coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used jurisdiction-level data collected by the UCLA COVID Behind Bars project to characterize vaccination coverage, initial vaccination rate, and days to saturation of coverages in the incarcerated population by state. We also used a regression model to understand the association between implemented policy (incentivization, prioritization, and decarceration) and incarcerated vaccine coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study found significant geographic heterogeneity in incarcerated vaccination coverage, initial vaccination rate, and days to saturation of coverage. Our regression analysis revealed that the timing of vaccine prioritization for incarcerated populations, measured as the duration they were prioritized before vaccines became available to the general public, was significantly associated with higher vaccination rates in these facilities. In contrast, decarceration and incentivization had weaker associations with vaccination coverage among the incarcerated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our work provides a quantitative analysis of vaccination in confined communities during a public health emergency. We highlight striking geographic disparities in incarcerated vaccination metrics across states, highlighting how decentralized correctional healthcare systems produced uneven protection for this vulnerable population. Our findings also inform optimal allocation of limited resources by demonstrating the effectiveness of early vaccine access policies relative to other policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 127218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25005158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

During the COVID-19 pandemic, carceral communities suffered disproportionate impacts across multiple health indicators despite numerous protective measures. As the COVID-19 vaccination campaign began in 2021, many states introduced plans and policies, including prioritization, decarceration, and incentivization, that could increase the vaccination coverage of these vulnerable communities and protect them from further spread. Here, we analyze the geographic distribution of COVID-19 vaccination coverage among incarcerated populations and assess the impact of implemented policies on this coverage.

Methods

We used jurisdiction-level data collected by the UCLA COVID Behind Bars project to characterize vaccination coverage, initial vaccination rate, and days to saturation of coverages in the incarcerated population by state. We also used a regression model to understand the association between implemented policy (incentivization, prioritization, and decarceration) and incarcerated vaccine coverage.

Results

Our study found significant geographic heterogeneity in incarcerated vaccination coverage, initial vaccination rate, and days to saturation of coverage. Our regression analysis revealed that the timing of vaccine prioritization for incarcerated populations, measured as the duration they were prioritized before vaccines became available to the general public, was significantly associated with higher vaccination rates in these facilities. In contrast, decarceration and incentivization had weaker associations with vaccination coverage among the incarcerated.

Conclusion

Our work provides a quantitative analysis of vaccination in confined communities during a public health emergency. We highlight striking geographic disparities in incarcerated vaccination metrics across states, highlighting how decentralized correctional healthcare systems produced uneven protection for this vulnerable population. Our findings also inform optimal allocation of limited resources by demonstrating the effectiveness of early vaccine access policies relative to other policies.
流行病中的监狱疫苗接种:地理差异和政策见解
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,尽管采取了许多保护措施,但农村社区在多个卫生指标方面受到了不成比例的影响。随着2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种运动于2021年开始,许多州出台了计划和政策,包括确定优先顺序、去中心化和激励措施,这些计划和政策可以增加这些脆弱社区的疫苗接种覆盖率,并保护它们免受进一步传播。在这里,我们分析了被监禁人群中COVID-19疫苗接种覆盖率的地理分布,并评估了实施政策对这一覆盖率的影响。方法我们使用加州大学洛杉矶分校COVID监狱项目收集的辖区级数据来描述各州监禁人口的疫苗接种覆盖率、初始疫苗接种率和覆盖率达到饱和的天数。我们还使用回归模型来理解实施政策(激励、优先排序和去隔离)与被监禁疫苗覆盖率之间的关系。结果我们的研究发现监禁疫苗接种覆盖率、初始疫苗接种率和覆盖饱和天数存在显著的地理异质性。我们的回归分析显示,被监禁人群优先接种疫苗的时间,即在疫苗向公众提供之前,他们被优先接种的时间,与这些设施中较高的疫苗接种率显着相关。相比之下,在被监禁者中,脱狱和激励与疫苗接种覆盖率的关联较弱。结论:我们的工作对突发公共卫生事件期间封闭社区的疫苗接种情况进行了定量分析。我们强调了各州监禁疫苗接种指标的显著地理差异,强调了分散的惩教保健系统如何对这一弱势群体产生不平衡的保护。我们的研究结果还通过证明早期疫苗获取政策相对于其他政策的有效性,为有限资源的最佳配置提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信