Qi Zhou , Yuling Lei , Luwen Tian , Shanshan Ai , Yuting Yang , Yueli Zhu
{"title":"Perception and sentiment analysis of palliative care in Chinese social media: Qualitative studies based on machine learning","authors":"Qi Zhou , Yuling Lei , Luwen Tian , Shanshan Ai , Yuting Yang , Yueli Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditional Chinese culture makes death a sensitive and taboo topic, leading patients and family members to refuse to choose palliative care.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To explore the current situation of the public's perception and sentiment towards palliative care and reduce the barriers health-related persons face in providing professional services.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The research steps include text acquisition, text cleaning, data standardization, K-Means clustering algorithm, and sentiment analysis algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study had 9017 comments. The comments increased yearly from 2014 to 2023. K-Means clustering results showed patients' physical condition, disease knowledge, and nursing service. Boson NLP results showed 3264 negative comments, 3451 positive comments, and 2302 neutral objective comments. The dictionary method showed positive and negative emotions such as anger, disgust, fear, sad, surprise, good, and happy. Negative emotions were mainly in Physical and mental condition. Positive emotions were mainly in nursing service and unrelated to disease knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Healthcare professionals should pay attention to the adverse effects of public misperceptions and negative emotions. They provide appropriate measures to enhance positive emotions and perceptions and encourage patients to accept palliative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 118178"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Traditional Chinese culture makes death a sensitive and taboo topic, leading patients and family members to refuse to choose palliative care.
Aim
To explore the current situation of the public's perception and sentiment towards palliative care and reduce the barriers health-related persons face in providing professional services.
Method
The research steps include text acquisition, text cleaning, data standardization, K-Means clustering algorithm, and sentiment analysis algorithm.
Results
This study had 9017 comments. The comments increased yearly from 2014 to 2023. K-Means clustering results showed patients' physical condition, disease knowledge, and nursing service. Boson NLP results showed 3264 negative comments, 3451 positive comments, and 2302 neutral objective comments. The dictionary method showed positive and negative emotions such as anger, disgust, fear, sad, surprise, good, and happy. Negative emotions were mainly in Physical and mental condition. Positive emotions were mainly in nursing service and unrelated to disease knowledge.
Conclusion
Healthcare professionals should pay attention to the adverse effects of public misperceptions and negative emotions. They provide appropriate measures to enhance positive emotions and perceptions and encourage patients to accept palliative care.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.