Gender discrimination in the workplace and the onset of problematic alcohol use among female wage workers: A longitudinal study in Korea

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Seong-Uk Baek , Jin-Ha Yoon , Jong-Uk Won
{"title":"Gender discrimination in the workplace and the onset of problematic alcohol use among female wage workers: A longitudinal study in Korea","authors":"Seong-Uk Baek ,&nbsp;Jin-Ha Yoon ,&nbsp;Jong-Uk Won","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored the association between workplace gender discrimination (WGD) and the onset of problematic alcohol use among female wage workers. This longitudinal study analyzed data from a nationwide sample of 4654 women, with 11,484 observations collected between 2012 and 2020. The participants reported their experiences with WGD across six dimensions: hiring practices, promotion opportunities, wage disparities, work assignments, access to training opportunities, and termination procedures. Participants were categorized into three groups based on the number of these WGD dimensions they experienced: no WGD (no experiences in any dimension), moderate WGD (experiences in 1–3 dimensions), and severe WGD (experiences in 4–6 dimensions). Problematic alcohol use was evaluated using the Cutting Down, Annoyance by Criticism, Guilty Feeling, and Eye-openers questionnaire. Generalized estimating equations were utilized to assess the relationship between the experience of WGD and the development of problematic alcohol use over a two-year period. The relative risk (RR) and its 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Among the participants, 68.8 %, 18.0 %, and 13.2 % experienced no, moderate, and severe WGD at the baseline, respectively. Compared with no experience of WGD, the RRs (95 % CI) for the onset of problematic alcohol use were 0.93 (0.50–1.71) and 2.08 (1.23–3.50) for moderate and severe WGD experience, respectively. For each WGD dimension, WGD related to promotion (RR: 1.66, 95 % CI: 1.01–2.72), wages (RR: 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.05–2.78), and termination (RR: 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.13–3.13) were related to the development of problematic alcohol use during the follow-up. WGD was associated with the onset of problematic alcohol use during the follow-up period. These findings underscore the necessity of proactive governmental and organizational initiatives to promote a gender-equitable work environment and mitigate WGD to protect women's health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 118183"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the association between workplace gender discrimination (WGD) and the onset of problematic alcohol use among female wage workers. This longitudinal study analyzed data from a nationwide sample of 4654 women, with 11,484 observations collected between 2012 and 2020. The participants reported their experiences with WGD across six dimensions: hiring practices, promotion opportunities, wage disparities, work assignments, access to training opportunities, and termination procedures. Participants were categorized into three groups based on the number of these WGD dimensions they experienced: no WGD (no experiences in any dimension), moderate WGD (experiences in 1–3 dimensions), and severe WGD (experiences in 4–6 dimensions). Problematic alcohol use was evaluated using the Cutting Down, Annoyance by Criticism, Guilty Feeling, and Eye-openers questionnaire. Generalized estimating equations were utilized to assess the relationship between the experience of WGD and the development of problematic alcohol use over a two-year period. The relative risk (RR) and its 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Among the participants, 68.8 %, 18.0 %, and 13.2 % experienced no, moderate, and severe WGD at the baseline, respectively. Compared with no experience of WGD, the RRs (95 % CI) for the onset of problematic alcohol use were 0.93 (0.50–1.71) and 2.08 (1.23–3.50) for moderate and severe WGD experience, respectively. For each WGD dimension, WGD related to promotion (RR: 1.66, 95 % CI: 1.01–2.72), wages (RR: 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.05–2.78), and termination (RR: 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.13–3.13) were related to the development of problematic alcohol use during the follow-up. WGD was associated with the onset of problematic alcohol use during the follow-up period. These findings underscore the necessity of proactive governmental and organizational initiatives to promote a gender-equitable work environment and mitigate WGD to protect women's health.
工作场所的性别歧视和女性工资工人酗酒问题的开始:韩国的一项纵向研究
本研究探讨了工作场所性别歧视(WGD)与女性工资工人出现问题性饮酒之间的关系。这项纵向研究分析了来自全国4654名女性样本的数据,并在2012年至2020年期间收集了11484项观察结果。参与者从六个方面报告了他们在WGD中的经历:招聘实践、晋升机会、工资差距、工作分配、获得培训机会和解雇程序。参与者根据他们经历的WGD维度的数量被分为三组:无WGD(没有任何维度的体验),中度WGD(1-3维度的体验)和重度WGD(4-6维度的体验)。有问题的酒精使用通过减少,批评烦恼,内疚感和大开眼界问卷进行评估。使用广义估计方程来评估两年期间内WGD的经历与问题酒精使用的发展之间的关系。计算相对危险度(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。在参与者中,68.8%、18.0%和13.2%分别在基线时没有、中度和重度WGD。与没有WGD经历的人相比,中度和重度WGD经历的问题性酒精使用发作的rr (95% CI)分别为0.93(0.50-1.71)和2.08(1.23-3.50)。对于每个WGD维度,与晋升(RR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.01-2.72)、工资(RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.05-2.78)和终止(RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.13-3.13)相关的WGD与随访期间问题酒精使用的发展有关。WGD与随访期间出现问题性酒精使用有关。这些调查结果强调,政府和组织必须采取积极主动的举措,促进两性平等的工作环境,减轻性别失衡,以保护妇女健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信