Navigating Anthropometric Assessment in Sports Settings: Perspectives from ISAK Practitioners in the UK and Ireland

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Nicola Brown
{"title":"Navigating Anthropometric Assessment in Sports Settings: Perspectives from ISAK Practitioners in the UK and Ireland","authors":"Nicola Brown","doi":"10.1007/s40279-025-02218-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Anthropometric assessment in high-performance sports is complex, requiring both physical and psychological considerations. Despite the increasing number of International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) accredited practitioners, the ethical and practical challenges they face—particularly in applying anthropometric data within dynamic sports environments—remain underexplored.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aim</h3><p>This qualitative study explores ISAK practitioners’ experiences of anthropometric assessment in high-performance sport, identifying key challenges and practitioner-informed strategies to enhance practice and athlete well-being.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Three on-line focus groups were conducted in August and September 2024 with 14 UK- and Ireland-based practitioners (11 female, three male), aged 44.0 ± 7.2 years. Participants had 10.6 ± 5.5 years of experience as ISAK Level 3 accredited practitioners and 11.0 ± 5.9 years of experience providing anthropometric support in sport, with 92% having worked at the international level. A semi-structured topic guide was used to facilitate discussion, and data analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis framework.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Three key themes were identified: (1) Holistic athlete care: Integrating anthropometric and performance data; (2) Bridging the gap: Enhancing education and training for real-world application; and (3) Challenging the status quo: Addressing cultural and organisational barriers. Participants emphasised the importance of holistic, individualised approaches to anthropometric assessment that resist reductionist views of body metrics. They advocated for structured mentorship, expanded professional development, and greater interdisciplinary collaboration to support ethical and effective practice.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Entrenched data-driven cultures and hierarchical structures hinder athlete-centred care. Overcoming these barriers requires collaboration between regulatory bodies, ISAK practitioners, and multidisciplinary teams. Integrating frameworks such as Entrusted Professional Activities and Communities of Practice, alongside experiential learning approaches, will enhance practitioner autonomy and ensure anthropometric assessment remains both effective and athlete centred.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02218-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Anthropometric assessment in high-performance sports is complex, requiring both physical and psychological considerations. Despite the increasing number of International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) accredited practitioners, the ethical and practical challenges they face—particularly in applying anthropometric data within dynamic sports environments—remain underexplored.

Aim

This qualitative study explores ISAK practitioners’ experiences of anthropometric assessment in high-performance sport, identifying key challenges and practitioner-informed strategies to enhance practice and athlete well-being.

Method

Three on-line focus groups were conducted in August and September 2024 with 14 UK- and Ireland-based practitioners (11 female, three male), aged 44.0 ± 7.2 years. Participants had 10.6 ± 5.5 years of experience as ISAK Level 3 accredited practitioners and 11.0 ± 5.9 years of experience providing anthropometric support in sport, with 92% having worked at the international level. A semi-structured topic guide was used to facilitate discussion, and data analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis framework.

Results

Three key themes were identified: (1) Holistic athlete care: Integrating anthropometric and performance data; (2) Bridging the gap: Enhancing education and training for real-world application; and (3) Challenging the status quo: Addressing cultural and organisational barriers. Participants emphasised the importance of holistic, individualised approaches to anthropometric assessment that resist reductionist views of body metrics. They advocated for structured mentorship, expanded professional development, and greater interdisciplinary collaboration to support ethical and effective practice.

Conclusions

Entrenched data-driven cultures and hierarchical structures hinder athlete-centred care. Overcoming these barriers requires collaboration between regulatory bodies, ISAK practitioners, and multidisciplinary teams. Integrating frameworks such as Entrusted Professional Activities and Communities of Practice, alongside experiential learning approaches, will enhance practitioner autonomy and ensure anthropometric assessment remains both effective and athlete centred.

在运动环境中导航人体测量学评估:来自英国和爱尔兰ISAK从业者的观点
背景:高性能运动中的人体测量学评估是复杂的,需要生理和心理的考虑。尽管国际人体测量学进步协会(ISAK)认证的从业人员越来越多,但他们面临的道德和实践挑战-特别是在动态运动环境中应用人体测量数据-仍未得到充分探索。目的:本定性研究探讨了ISAK从业者在高性能运动中进行人体测量评估的经验,确定了关键挑战和从业者知情的策略,以加强练习和运动员的健康。方法于2024年8月和9月对14名英国和爱尔兰执业医师(女性11人,男性3人)进行3次在线焦点小组调查,年龄44.0±7.2岁。参与者具有10.6±5.5年ISAK 3级认证从业经验,11.0±5.9年在体育运动中提供人体测量支持的经验,其中92%具有国际水平的工作经验。采用半结构化的主题指南促进讨论,数据分析遵循Braun和Clarke的反思性主题分析框架。结果确定了三个关键主题:(1)运动员整体护理:整合人体测量和成绩数据;(2)弥合差距:加强实际应用的教育和培训;(3)挑战现状:解决文化和组织障碍。与会者强调了全面的、个性化的人体测量评估方法的重要性,这种方法抵制了身体测量的简化论观点。他们提倡结构化的指导、扩展的专业发展和更大的跨学科合作,以支持道德和有效的实践。数据驱动的文化和等级结构阻碍了以运动员为中心的护理。克服这些障碍需要监管机构、ISAK从业者和多学科团队之间的合作。整合诸如委托专业活动和实践社区等框架,以及体验式学习方法,将增强从业者的自主权,并确保人体测量评估既有效又以运动员为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信