Creating Kinship with Nature and Boosting Well-Being: Testing Two Novel Character Strengths-Based Nature Connectedness Interventions

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Holli-Anne Passmore, Ryan Lumber, Ryan Niemiec, Levi I. Sofen
{"title":"Creating Kinship with Nature and Boosting Well-Being: Testing Two Novel Character Strengths-Based Nature Connectedness Interventions","authors":"Holli-Anne Passmore, Ryan Lumber, Ryan Niemiec, Levi I. Sofen","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00900-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We tested the efficacy of engaging in two novel randomized interventions based on character strengths and engaging with nature on boosting nature connectedness and well-being. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 134, international community adults) and Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 106, Canadian university students), participants were tasked with noticing how their character strengths were displayed in nature (C<i>in</i>N intervention). In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 99, Canadian university students), participants were tasked with using their highest character strength in a new way each day to connect with nature (CS<i>with</i>N intervention). A no treatment control condition was used for comparison. Both interventions significantly boosted nature connectedness (<i>d</i>s = 0.48, 0.66, 0.67). With respect to well-being, the CS<i>in</i>N intervention significantly boosted transcendent connectedness (<i>ds</i> = 053, 0.57), elevation (<i>d</i> = 0.40), and harmony in life (<i>d</i> = 0.48). The CS<i>with</i>N intervention also significantly boosted transcendent connectedness (<i>d</i> = 0.43), elevation (<i>d</i> = 0.48), and harmony in life (<i>d</i> = 0.50), along with satisfaction of basic need of relatedness (<i>d</i> = 0.58), flourishing (<i>d</i> = 0.57), satisfaction with life (<i>d</i> = 0.44), and positive affect (<i>d</i> = 0.43). Beneficial effects on nature connectedness and well-being were evident despite there being no significant difference in time spent in nature compared to controls. These findings present a unique contribution to the current literature. To our knowledge, the CS<i>in</i>N and CS<i>with</i>N interventions are the first interventions developed and tested that incorporate character strengths and engagement with nature with the dual goal of boosting nature connectedness and individual well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00900-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We tested the efficacy of engaging in two novel randomized interventions based on character strengths and engaging with nature on boosting nature connectedness and well-being. In Study 1 (N = 134, international community adults) and Study 2 (N = 106, Canadian university students), participants were tasked with noticing how their character strengths were displayed in nature (CinN intervention). In Study 3 (N = 99, Canadian university students), participants were tasked with using their highest character strength in a new way each day to connect with nature (CSwithN intervention). A no treatment control condition was used for comparison. Both interventions significantly boosted nature connectedness (ds = 0.48, 0.66, 0.67). With respect to well-being, the CSinN intervention significantly boosted transcendent connectedness (ds = 053, 0.57), elevation (d = 0.40), and harmony in life (d = 0.48). The CSwithN intervention also significantly boosted transcendent connectedness (d = 0.43), elevation (d = 0.48), and harmony in life (d = 0.50), along with satisfaction of basic need of relatedness (d = 0.58), flourishing (d = 0.57), satisfaction with life (d = 0.44), and positive affect (d = 0.43). Beneficial effects on nature connectedness and well-being were evident despite there being no significant difference in time spent in nature compared to controls. These findings present a unique contribution to the current literature. To our knowledge, the CSinN and CSwithN interventions are the first interventions developed and tested that incorporate character strengths and engagement with nature with the dual goal of boosting nature connectedness and individual well-being.

创造与自然的亲缘关系和促进幸福感:测试两种新的基于性格优势的自然联系干预措施
我们测试了参与两种基于性格优势和与自然接触的新型随机干预对促进自然联系和幸福感的效果。在研究1 (N = 134,国际社区成年人)和研究2 (N = 106,加拿大大学生)中,参与者的任务是注意他们的性格优势是如何在大自然中表现出来的(CinN干预)。在研究3中(N = 99,加拿大大学生),参与者被要求每天以一种新的方式使用他们最高的性格力量与自然联系(CSwithN干预)。采用无处理对照条件进行比较。两种干预措施都显著提高了自然连通性(ds = 0.48, 0.66, 0.67)。在幸福感方面,CSinN干预显著提高了超越连接(ds = 053, 0.57)、提升(d = 0.40)和生活和谐(d = 0.48)。CSwithN干预还显著提高了超越连接(d = 0.43)、提升(d = 0.48)和生活和谐(d = 0.50),以及基本关系需求的满足(d = 0.58)、繁荣(d = 0.57)、生活满意度(d = 0.44)和积极情感(d = 0.43)。尽管与对照组相比,在大自然中度过的时间没有显著差异,但对自然联系和幸福感的有益影响是明显的。这些发现对当前的文献有独特的贡献。据我们所知,CSinN和CSwithN干预措施是第一个开发和测试的干预措施,将性格优势和与自然的接触结合起来,以促进自然联系和个人福祉的双重目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields. The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments. The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes. Central Questions include, but are not limited to: Conceptualization: What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being? How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life? Operationalization and Measurement: Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life? How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain? What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions? Prevalence and causality Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings? How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)? What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions? Evaluation: What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress? Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers? Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health? Interdisciplinary studies: How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines? Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research? What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信