Heterogeneity of TP53 mutations necessitates differentiation with p53-rescue therapies

IF 72.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jiaqi Wu, Huaxin Song, Shujun Xiao, Min Lu
{"title":"Heterogeneity of TP53 mutations necessitates differentiation with p53-rescue therapies","authors":"Jiaqi Wu, Huaxin Song, Shujun Xiao, Min Lu","doi":"10.1038/s41568-025-00826-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with interest the Review by Peuget et al. (Peuget, S., Zhou, X. &amp; Selivanova, G. Translating p53-based therapies for cancer into the clinic. <i>Nat. Rev. Cancer</i> <b>24</b>, 192–215 (2024))<sup>1</sup> that introduces the development of p53-based therapies. We fully agree with the tremendous clinical value of p53-targeting drugs, as <i>TP53</i> is the most commonly mutated gene in cancer<sup>1</sup>. However, we would like to point out that the descriptions of small-molecule compounds that can rescue two or more different types of p53 mutant need to be given with extreme caution. Of the 23 registered p53-rescue trials, 17 trials are investigating these compounds in over 1,000 patients with cancer without differentiating the <i>TP53</i> mutations (Supplementary Table 1).</p><p>Small-molecule compounds that bind mutant p53 and restore its tumour-suppressive function have been extensively pursued over the past decades, with at least 71 rescue compounds identified<sup>2,3,4</sup>. The majority of these are termed generic rescue compounds and can rescue numerous mutants simultaneously, spawning hundreds of basic and clinical studies using these compounds to rescue arbitrarily selected p53 mutants. However, based on the logic derived from the diverse mechanisms of action of p53 mutants (Fig. 1b) and increasing experimental validations<sup>5,6,7</sup>, a consensus is forming that no generic rescue compound can provide a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to rescue two or more types of p53 mutant. For example, a p53-thermostabilizing compound can shift the ‘unfolding–folding’ dynamic balance towards folding, thereby promoting the refolding of structural mutants and rescuing them. Thus, such a compound is both mechanistically and experimentally validated as ineffective in rescuing p53 truncation mutants that lack large stretches of amino acids, or DNA-contact mutants that lack DNA-binding amino acids<sup>5,6,7</sup>. Similarly, a DNA-contact mutant-rescue compound (if one were to exist) should act by compensating for the lost DNA-binding amino acids and, thus, mechanistically could not rescue structural mutants, which are unfolded.</p>","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":72.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-025-00826-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with interest the Review by Peuget et al. (Peuget, S., Zhou, X. & Selivanova, G. Translating p53-based therapies for cancer into the clinic. Nat. Rev. Cancer 24, 192–215 (2024))1 that introduces the development of p53-based therapies. We fully agree with the tremendous clinical value of p53-targeting drugs, as TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene in cancer1. However, we would like to point out that the descriptions of small-molecule compounds that can rescue two or more different types of p53 mutant need to be given with extreme caution. Of the 23 registered p53-rescue trials, 17 trials are investigating these compounds in over 1,000 patients with cancer without differentiating the TP53 mutations (Supplementary Table 1).

Small-molecule compounds that bind mutant p53 and restore its tumour-suppressive function have been extensively pursued over the past decades, with at least 71 rescue compounds identified2,3,4. The majority of these are termed generic rescue compounds and can rescue numerous mutants simultaneously, spawning hundreds of basic and clinical studies using these compounds to rescue arbitrarily selected p53 mutants. However, based on the logic derived from the diverse mechanisms of action of p53 mutants (Fig. 1b) and increasing experimental validations5,6,7, a consensus is forming that no generic rescue compound can provide a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to rescue two or more types of p53 mutant. For example, a p53-thermostabilizing compound can shift the ‘unfolding–folding’ dynamic balance towards folding, thereby promoting the refolding of structural mutants and rescuing them. Thus, such a compound is both mechanistically and experimentally validated as ineffective in rescuing p53 truncation mutants that lack large stretches of amino acids, or DNA-contact mutants that lack DNA-binding amino acids5,6,7. Similarly, a DNA-contact mutant-rescue compound (if one were to exist) should act by compensating for the lost DNA-binding amino acids and, thus, mechanistically could not rescue structural mutants, which are unfolded.

Abstract Image

TP53突变的异质性需要区分p53拯救疗法
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Peuget等人的评论(Peuget, S., Zhou, X. &;将基于p53的癌症治疗方法应用于临床。Nat. Rev. Cancer 24, 192-215(2024))1,介绍了基于p53的治疗方法的发展。我们完全同意p53靶向药物的巨大临床价值,因为TP53是癌症中最常见的突变基因1。然而,我们想指出的是,描述可以拯救两种或两种以上不同类型的p53突变体的小分子化合物需要非常谨慎。在23项已注册的p53拯救试验中,17项试验正在1,000多名癌症患者中研究这些化合物,而没有区分TP53突变(补充表1)。在过去的几十年里,人们一直在广泛研究结合突变型p53并恢复其肿瘤抑制功能的小分子化合物,至少发现了71种拯救化合物2,3,4。其中大多数被称为通用拯救化合物,可以同时拯救许多突变体,产生了数百个使用这些化合物拯救任意选择的p53突变体的基础和临床研究。然而,基于p53突变体不同作用机制的逻辑(图1b)和越来越多的实验验证[5,6,7],一个共识正在形成,即没有一种通用的拯救化合物可以提供“一贯性”的解决方案来拯救两种或两种以上类型的p53突变体。例如,p53-热稳定化合物可以将“展开-折叠”的动态平衡转向折叠,从而促进结构突变体的再折叠并拯救它们。因此,这种化合物在机制上和实验上都被证实对缺乏大片段氨基酸的p53截断突变体或缺乏dna结合氨基酸的dna接触突变体无效5,6,7。同样,dna接触的突变体拯救化合物(如果存在的话)应该通过补偿丢失的dna结合氨基酸来起作用,因此,从机制上讲,不能拯救未展开的结构突变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
111.90
自引率
0.40%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信