Benchmarking methods for classifying space functions and access elements in multi-unit apartment buildings

IF 9.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Amir Ziaee , Georg Suter
{"title":"Benchmarking methods for classifying space functions and access elements in multi-unit apartment buildings","authors":"Amir Ziaee ,&nbsp;Georg Suter","doi":"10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine learning (ML), graph deep learning (GDL), natural language processing (NLP), generative, and image deep learning (IDL) methods are promising for automating space function and space access element classification for building analysis. Benchmarking these five methods is currently infeasible primarily due to a lack of datasets with diverse data representation formats. This paper introduces SFC-A68, a dataset derived from 275 apartments in 13 countries, to address this. The dataset was used to develop three state-of-the-art models for each of the five methods. Benchmarking predictive performance resulted in a GDL model, HGAT, achieving the highest weighted average F1-Score of 95.0%, surpassing other models by 11.0% or more. Moreover, GDL models required less pre-processing and no post-processing, fewer trainable parameters, and shorter training times than NLP, Generative, and IDL models. ML models were less accurate than IDL models but required fewer trainable parameters, shorter training times, and least pre- and no post-processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8660,"journal":{"name":"Automation in Construction","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 106237"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automation in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580525002778","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML), graph deep learning (GDL), natural language processing (NLP), generative, and image deep learning (IDL) methods are promising for automating space function and space access element classification for building analysis. Benchmarking these five methods is currently infeasible primarily due to a lack of datasets with diverse data representation formats. This paper introduces SFC-A68, a dataset derived from 275 apartments in 13 countries, to address this. The dataset was used to develop three state-of-the-art models for each of the five methods. Benchmarking predictive performance resulted in a GDL model, HGAT, achieving the highest weighted average F1-Score of 95.0%, surpassing other models by 11.0% or more. Moreover, GDL models required less pre-processing and no post-processing, fewer trainable parameters, and shorter training times than NLP, Generative, and IDL models. ML models were less accurate than IDL models but required fewer trainable parameters, shorter training times, and least pre- and no post-processing.
多单元公寓楼空间功能和通道要素分类的基准方法
机器学习(ML)、图形深度学习(GDL)、自然语言处理(NLP)、生成和图像深度学习(IDL)方法有望实现自动化空间功能和空间访问元素分类,用于建筑分析。对这五种方法进行基准测试目前是不可行的,主要原因是缺乏具有不同数据表示格式的数据集。本文介绍了SFC-A68,这是一个来自13个国家275套公寓的数据集,以解决这个问题。该数据集用于为五种方法中的每种方法开发三个最先进的模型。对预测性能进行基准测试后,GDL模型HGAT获得了最高的加权平均F1-Score,达到95.0%,比其他模型高出11.0%或更多。此外,与NLP、Generative和IDL模型相比,GDL模型需要更少的预处理,不需要后处理,可训练参数更少,训练时间更短。ML模型不如IDL模型准确,但需要更少的可训练参数,更短的训练时间,最少的预处理和无后处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automation in Construction
Automation in Construction 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
16.50%
发文量
563
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Automation in Construction is an international journal that focuses on publishing original research papers related to the use of Information Technologies in various aspects of the construction industry. The journal covers topics such as design, engineering, construction technologies, and the maintenance and management of constructed facilities. The scope of Automation in Construction is extensive and covers all stages of the construction life cycle. This includes initial planning and design, construction of the facility, operation and maintenance, as well as the eventual dismantling and recycling of buildings and engineering structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信