Irmak Karaca,Zheng Xian Thng,Albert Bromeo,Azadeh Mobasserian,Jia-Horung Hung,Amir Akhavanrezayat,Ngoc Trong Tuong Than,Cigdem Yasar,Negin Yavari,Dalia El Feky,Osama Elaraby,Anh Ngoc Tram Tran,Xiaoyan Zhang,Aim-On Saengsirinavin,Frances Andrea Anover,Yue Bai,Jingli Guo,Chi Mong Christopher Or,Diana V Do,Quan Dong Nguyen
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of biologics in pediatric non-infectious retinal vasculitis.","authors":"Irmak Karaca,Zheng Xian Thng,Albert Bromeo,Azadeh Mobasserian,Jia-Horung Hung,Amir Akhavanrezayat,Ngoc Trong Tuong Than,Cigdem Yasar,Negin Yavari,Dalia El Feky,Osama Elaraby,Anh Ngoc Tram Tran,Xiaoyan Zhang,Aim-On Saengsirinavin,Frances Andrea Anover,Yue Bai,Jingli Guo,Chi Mong Christopher Or,Diana V Do,Quan Dong Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) injections (Group 1), infliximab (IFX) (Group 2), and tocilizumab (TCZ) (Group 3) infusions in pediatric non-infectious retinal vasculitis (RV).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nRetrospective interventional case series.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPediatric patients who were diagnosed with non-infectious RV and treated with biologics (ADA, IFX, TCZ) for ≥6 months were included. Chart review of 11 patients (18 eyes), 17 patients (30 eyes), and 7 patients (11 eyes) in Group 1, 2 and 3, respectively, was performed to assess clinical characteristics, central subfield thickness (CST), and fluorescein angiography (FA) score using the Angiographic Scoring for the Uveitis Working Group (ASUWOG) system.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMean age was 13.5±4.3 years in Group 1, 11.8±2.5 years in Group 2, and 13.9±4.1 years in Group 3 (p=0.332). Eight patients (72.7%, 13 eyes) in Group 1, and 14 patients (82.4%, 24 eyes) in Group 2 were biologic-naïve, whereas in Group 3 all patients were treated with ADA and/or IFX prior to TCZ. Mean FA scores were significantly reduced from 6.8±2.6, 13.4±4.8, and 12.8±4.0 at baseline to 0.9±2.3, 3.6±4.6, and 4.4±3.9 at final visit in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05). Complete RV resolution was observed in 12 (66.7%), 13 (43.3%), and 1 (9.1%) eyes; mean time to complete resolution was 11.0±5.0, 13.3±5.8, and 23 months in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No significant adverse events were observed in any group, except hair loss in one patient which led to discontinuation of IFX infusions after 20 cycles of therapy.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nADA, IFZ, and TCZ are effective and safe treatment options for pediatric non-infectious RV as objectively shown by FA scoring. TCZ appears as an effective therapy for patients with JIA-associated RV or those who failed TNF-α inhibitors.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
To assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) injections (Group 1), infliximab (IFX) (Group 2), and tocilizumab (TCZ) (Group 3) infusions in pediatric non-infectious retinal vasculitis (RV).
DESIGN
Retrospective interventional case series.
METHODS
Pediatric patients who were diagnosed with non-infectious RV and treated with biologics (ADA, IFX, TCZ) for ≥6 months were included. Chart review of 11 patients (18 eyes), 17 patients (30 eyes), and 7 patients (11 eyes) in Group 1, 2 and 3, respectively, was performed to assess clinical characteristics, central subfield thickness (CST), and fluorescein angiography (FA) score using the Angiographic Scoring for the Uveitis Working Group (ASUWOG) system.
RESULTS
Mean age was 13.5±4.3 years in Group 1, 11.8±2.5 years in Group 2, and 13.9±4.1 years in Group 3 (p=0.332). Eight patients (72.7%, 13 eyes) in Group 1, and 14 patients (82.4%, 24 eyes) in Group 2 were biologic-naïve, whereas in Group 3 all patients were treated with ADA and/or IFX prior to TCZ. Mean FA scores were significantly reduced from 6.8±2.6, 13.4±4.8, and 12.8±4.0 at baseline to 0.9±2.3, 3.6±4.6, and 4.4±3.9 at final visit in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05). Complete RV resolution was observed in 12 (66.7%), 13 (43.3%), and 1 (9.1%) eyes; mean time to complete resolution was 11.0±5.0, 13.3±5.8, and 23 months in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No significant adverse events were observed in any group, except hair loss in one patient which led to discontinuation of IFX infusions after 20 cycles of therapy.
CONCLUSION
ADA, IFZ, and TCZ are effective and safe treatment options for pediatric non-infectious RV as objectively shown by FA scoring. TCZ appears as an effective therapy for patients with JIA-associated RV or those who failed TNF-α inhibitors.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.