Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis - a pilot study.

Inger Gjertsson,Ylva Aurell,Anna Rudin,Anna-Karin Hultgård Ekwall,Eva Klingberg,Kristina Forslind
{"title":"Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis - a pilot study.","authors":"Inger Gjertsson,Ylva Aurell,Anna Rudin,Anna-Karin Hultgård Ekwall,Eva Klingberg,Kristina Forslind","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can accurately assess erosive disease in the hands, wrists and feet in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to compare CBCT with conventional radiography (CR) for the assessment of erosions in patients with early RA.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nCBCT and CR of the hands, wrists and feet of 17 patients with treatment naive early RA were assessed at diagnosis and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Erosions on CBCT scans were scored by the same observer using the modified Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (mod.RAMRIS), which evaluates the same joints as the Sharp van der Heijde Score (SHS). Radiographs were scored for erosions using the SHS by the same observer.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAt baseline there was a significant difference in the erosion score between CBCT and CR, shown with a percentage of maximum score. The number of erosions and the number of eroded joints were significantly higher with CBCT compared with CR at 6 and 12 months. The number of detected repair of erosions was higher with CBCT than with CR at both 6 and 12 months.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nCBCT was more sensitive than CR to detect erosions and repair in patients with early RA. CBCT has the potential to become a sensitive tool for monitoring destructive disease in patients with RA.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can accurately assess erosive disease in the hands, wrists and feet in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to compare CBCT with conventional radiography (CR) for the assessment of erosions in patients with early RA. METHODS CBCT and CR of the hands, wrists and feet of 17 patients with treatment naive early RA were assessed at diagnosis and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Erosions on CBCT scans were scored by the same observer using the modified Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (mod.RAMRIS), which evaluates the same joints as the Sharp van der Heijde Score (SHS). Radiographs were scored for erosions using the SHS by the same observer. RESULTS At baseline there was a significant difference in the erosion score between CBCT and CR, shown with a percentage of maximum score. The number of erosions and the number of eroded joints were significantly higher with CBCT compared with CR at 6 and 12 months. The number of detected repair of erosions was higher with CBCT than with CR at both 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION CBCT was more sensitive than CR to detect erosions and repair in patients with early RA. CBCT has the potential to become a sensitive tool for monitoring destructive disease in patients with RA.
锥形束计算机断层扫描评估早期类风湿关节炎的侵蚀-一项初步研究。
目的利用单束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)准确评估已确诊的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的手、手腕和足部糜烂性病变。本研究的目的是比较CBCT与常规影像学(CR)对早期RA患者糜烂程度的评估。方法对17例早期RA患者在诊断时、随访6个月和12个月时的手、手腕和足部scbct和CR进行评估。CBCT扫描上的侵蚀由同一观察者使用改良的类风湿关节炎磁共振成像评分(mode . ramris)进行评分,该评分与Sharp van der Heijde评分(SHS)评估相同的关节。由同一观察者使用SHS对x线片的侵蚀进行评分。结果基线时,CBCT和CR的糜烂评分有显著差异,以最大评分百分比表示。在6个月和12个月时,CBCT组的侵蚀数量和侵蚀关节数量明显高于CR组。在6个月和12个月时,CBCT检测到的糜烂修复数量都高于CR。结论cbct检测早期RA患者糜烂及修复的敏感性高于CR。CBCT有可能成为监测RA患者破坏性疾病的敏感工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信