{"title":"Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis - a pilot study.","authors":"Inger Gjertsson,Ylva Aurell,Anna Rudin,Anna-Karin Hultgård Ekwall,Eva Klingberg,Kristina Forslind","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can accurately assess erosive disease in the hands, wrists and feet in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to compare CBCT with conventional radiography (CR) for the assessment of erosions in patients with early RA.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nCBCT and CR of the hands, wrists and feet of 17 patients with treatment naive early RA were assessed at diagnosis and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Erosions on CBCT scans were scored by the same observer using the modified Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (mod.RAMRIS), which evaluates the same joints as the Sharp van der Heijde Score (SHS). Radiographs were scored for erosions using the SHS by the same observer.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAt baseline there was a significant difference in the erosion score between CBCT and CR, shown with a percentage of maximum score. The number of erosions and the number of eroded joints were significantly higher with CBCT compared with CR at 6 and 12 months. The number of detected repair of erosions was higher with CBCT than with CR at both 6 and 12 months.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nCBCT was more sensitive than CR to detect erosions and repair in patients with early RA. CBCT has the potential to become a sensitive tool for monitoring destructive disease in patients with RA.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can accurately assess erosive disease in the hands, wrists and feet in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to compare CBCT with conventional radiography (CR) for the assessment of erosions in patients with early RA.
METHODS
CBCT and CR of the hands, wrists and feet of 17 patients with treatment naive early RA were assessed at diagnosis and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Erosions on CBCT scans were scored by the same observer using the modified Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (mod.RAMRIS), which evaluates the same joints as the Sharp van der Heijde Score (SHS). Radiographs were scored for erosions using the SHS by the same observer.
RESULTS
At baseline there was a significant difference in the erosion score between CBCT and CR, shown with a percentage of maximum score. The number of erosions and the number of eroded joints were significantly higher with CBCT compared with CR at 6 and 12 months. The number of detected repair of erosions was higher with CBCT than with CR at both 6 and 12 months.
CONCLUSION
CBCT was more sensitive than CR to detect erosions and repair in patients with early RA. CBCT has the potential to become a sensitive tool for monitoring destructive disease in patients with RA.
目的利用单束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)准确评估已确诊的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的手、手腕和足部糜烂性病变。本研究的目的是比较CBCT与常规影像学(CR)对早期RA患者糜烂程度的评估。方法对17例早期RA患者在诊断时、随访6个月和12个月时的手、手腕和足部scbct和CR进行评估。CBCT扫描上的侵蚀由同一观察者使用改良的类风湿关节炎磁共振成像评分(mode . ramris)进行评分,该评分与Sharp van der Heijde评分(SHS)评估相同的关节。由同一观察者使用SHS对x线片的侵蚀进行评分。结果基线时,CBCT和CR的糜烂评分有显著差异,以最大评分百分比表示。在6个月和12个月时,CBCT组的侵蚀数量和侵蚀关节数量明显高于CR组。在6个月和12个月时,CBCT检测到的糜烂修复数量都高于CR。结论cbct检测早期RA患者糜烂及修复的敏感性高于CR。CBCT有可能成为监测RA患者破坏性疾病的敏感工具。