Decoding uterine leiomyosarcoma: is ultrasound diagnosis still a daunting challenge?

Camilla DI Dio, Stefania Pipitone, Rossella Del Vecchio, Elisa Noce, Marika Denotti, Mauro Ceccanti, Luigi Tarani, Ludovico Muzii, Giampiero Ferraguti, Marco Fiore, Maria G Piccioni
{"title":"Decoding uterine leiomyosarcoma: is ultrasound diagnosis still a daunting challenge?","authors":"Camilla DI Dio, Stefania Pipitone, Rossella Del Vecchio, Elisa Noce, Marika Denotti, Mauro Ceccanti, Luigi Tarani, Ludovico Muzii, Giampiero Ferraguti, Marco Fiore, Maria G Piccioni","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09669-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This narrative review, based on the current literature, aims to evaluate whether or not preoperative ultrasound can effectively distinguish between uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS) and leiomyomas (ULM).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>By using PubMed, Scopus and WOS, an extensive literature search was conducted to identify ultrasound characteristics that specifically differentiate uterine ULMS from ULM.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>This review analyzed several ultrasound features to distinguish ULMS from ULM, including the maximum diameter of myometrial growth, the number of lesions (solitary/multiple), tissue echogenicity (homogeneous/heterogeneous), growth borders (regular/irregular), the presence of cystic regions, shadow presence, subjective color grading, and the vascular pattern of the myometrial lesion (circumferential/intralesional). Our findings suggest that in postmenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and a new or enlarging mesenchymal mass, ULMS should be suspected. Features such as irregular tumor margins, moderate-to-abundant intralesional blood flow, cystic regions, and lack of calcifications indicate a higher risk of ULMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Benign and malignant myometrial lesions should be disclosed by algorithms including ultrasound combined with clinical presentations and, if necessary, magnetic resonance imaging. This means that further prospective studies should be conducted to consolidate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09669-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This narrative review, based on the current literature, aims to evaluate whether or not preoperative ultrasound can effectively distinguish between uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS) and leiomyomas (ULM).

Evidence acquisition: By using PubMed, Scopus and WOS, an extensive literature search was conducted to identify ultrasound characteristics that specifically differentiate uterine ULMS from ULM.

Evidence synthesis: This review analyzed several ultrasound features to distinguish ULMS from ULM, including the maximum diameter of myometrial growth, the number of lesions (solitary/multiple), tissue echogenicity (homogeneous/heterogeneous), growth borders (regular/irregular), the presence of cystic regions, shadow presence, subjective color grading, and the vascular pattern of the myometrial lesion (circumferential/intralesional). Our findings suggest that in postmenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and a new or enlarging mesenchymal mass, ULMS should be suspected. Features such as irregular tumor margins, moderate-to-abundant intralesional blood flow, cystic regions, and lack of calcifications indicate a higher risk of ULMS.

Conclusions: Benign and malignant myometrial lesions should be disclosed by algorithms including ultrasound combined with clinical presentations and, if necessary, magnetic resonance imaging. This means that further prospective studies should be conducted to consolidate our findings.

解码子宫平滑肌肉瘤:超声诊断仍然是一个艰巨的挑战吗?
前言:本文在现有文献的基础上,对术前超声是否能有效区分子宫平滑肌肉瘤(ULMS)和子宫平滑肌瘤(ULM)进行综述。证据获取:通过PubMed、Scopus和WOS进行了广泛的文献检索,以确定子宫ULMS与ULM的特异性超声特征。证据综合:本综述分析了几种超声特征来区分ULMS和ULM,包括子宫肌瘤生长的最大直径、病变数量(单发/多发)、组织回声性(均匀/非均匀)、生长边界(规则/不规则)、囊性区域的存在、阴影的存在、主观颜色分级和子宫肌瘤病变的血管模式(周/病灶内)。我们的研究结果表明,绝经后出现子宫异常出血和新的或增大的间质肿块的患者应怀疑ULMS。不规则的肿瘤边缘、中度至丰富的病灶内血流、囊性区域和缺乏钙化等特征提示ULMS的高风险。结论:子宫肌瘤良恶性病变应通过超声结合临床表现,必要时可结合磁共振成像等方法进行诊断。这意味着需要进一步的前瞻性研究来巩固我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信