Anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation: Challenges in stroke prevention and heart failure management.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jiri Vrtal, Jiri Plasek, Jan Vaclavik, Jozef Dodulik, David Sipula
{"title":"Anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation: Challenges in stroke prevention and heart failure management.","authors":"Jiri Vrtal, Jiri Plasek, Jan Vaclavik, Jozef Dodulik, David Sipula","doi":"10.5507/bp.2025.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally, contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. With advancements in implantable devices like pacemakers, defibrillators, and loop recorders, incidental detection of AF as device-detected AF (DDAF) or subclinical AF (SCAF) has become common. This asymptomatic AF presents unique management challenges, particularly in anticoagulation decisions for stroke prevention. Evidence from recent trials, notably NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA, indicates a complex risk-benefit profile for anticoagulation in DDAF. In ARTESiA, anticoagulation modestly reduced stroke and systemic embolism rates, though this effect did not reach statistical significance. The NOAH-AFNET 6 trial found no significant reduction in a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism with anticoagulation compared to placebo. Both trials revealed an increased bleeding risk, underscoring the need to carefully weigh stroke prevention against bleeding risks in DDAF. The 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines reflect this nuanced approach by advocating a tailored, risk-based strategy. Emerging evidence also shows that AF burden impacts heart failure (HF) outcomes, with a five-fold increase in HF hospitalizations associated with higher AF burden. This highlights the importance of rhythm or rate control to reduce HF progression, particularly in patients with both AF and HF, where reducing AF burden is associated with better prognosis and fewer hospitalizations. Future research should focus on refining anticoagulation strategies, especially for patients with low AF burden, and exploring novel approaches like intermittent anticoagulation and advanced monitoring to support personalized DDAF management.</p>","PeriodicalId":55363,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2025.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally, contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. With advancements in implantable devices like pacemakers, defibrillators, and loop recorders, incidental detection of AF as device-detected AF (DDAF) or subclinical AF (SCAF) has become common. This asymptomatic AF presents unique management challenges, particularly in anticoagulation decisions for stroke prevention. Evidence from recent trials, notably NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA, indicates a complex risk-benefit profile for anticoagulation in DDAF. In ARTESiA, anticoagulation modestly reduced stroke and systemic embolism rates, though this effect did not reach statistical significance. The NOAH-AFNET 6 trial found no significant reduction in a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism with anticoagulation compared to placebo. Both trials revealed an increased bleeding risk, underscoring the need to carefully weigh stroke prevention against bleeding risks in DDAF. The 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines reflect this nuanced approach by advocating a tailored, risk-based strategy. Emerging evidence also shows that AF burden impacts heart failure (HF) outcomes, with a five-fold increase in HF hospitalizations associated with higher AF burden. This highlights the importance of rhythm or rate control to reduce HF progression, particularly in patients with both AF and HF, where reducing AF burden is associated with better prognosis and fewer hospitalizations. Future research should focus on refining anticoagulation strategies, especially for patients with low AF burden, and exploring novel approaches like intermittent anticoagulation and advanced monitoring to support personalized DDAF management.

设备检测心房颤动的抗凝:卒中预防和心力衰竭管理的挑战。
房颤(AF)是全球最常见的心律失常,对发病率和死亡率有重要影响。随着起搏器、除颤器和循环记录仪等植入式设备的进步,偶然检测到AF为设备检测AF (DDAF)或亚临床AF (SCAF)已经变得很常见。这种无症状房颤提出了独特的管理挑战,特别是在卒中预防的抗凝决策中。最近的试验,特别是NOAH-AFNET 6和ARTESiA的证据表明,DDAF抗凝治疗具有复杂的风险-收益特征。在ARTESiA中,抗凝适度降低了卒中和全身栓塞率,尽管这种效果没有达到统计学意义。NOAH-AFNET 6试验发现,与安慰剂相比,抗凝治疗没有显著降低心血管死亡、中风或全身性栓塞的复合发生率。两项试验均显示出血风险增加,强调在DDAF中需要仔细权衡卒中预防和出血风险。2024年欧洲心脏病学会指南通过倡导量身定制的、基于风险的策略,反映了这种微妙的方法。新出现的证据还表明,房颤负担影响心力衰竭(HF)的结局,房颤负担加重导致HF住院率增加5倍。这突出了心律或心率控制对减少心衰进展的重要性,特别是在房颤和心衰患者中,减少房颤负担与更好的预后和更少的住院治疗有关。未来的研究应侧重于完善抗凝策略,特别是对于房颤负担低的患者,并探索间歇性抗凝和高级监测等新方法,以支持个性化的DDAF管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Papers is a journal of Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Olomouc, Czech Republic. It includes reviews and original articles reporting on basic and clinical research in medicine. Biomedical Papers is published as one volume per year in four issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信