[MSB-18] Impact of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Ufuk Türkmen, Görkem Yiğit, Kudret Atakan Tekin, Ayla Ece Çelikten, Ertekin Utku Ünal
{"title":"[MSB-18] Impact of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.","authors":"Ufuk Türkmen, Görkem Yiğit, Kudret Atakan Tekin, Ayla Ece Çelikten, Ertekin Utku Ünal","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing cardiac tamponade and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 384 elective patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2021 and 2024. Patients who underwent posterior pericardiotomy (Group 1) were compared with those who did not (Group 2). Group 1 included 178 patients (135 males, 53 females; mean age: 62.62±8.78 years), while Group 2 included 122 patients (98 males, 24 females, mean age 61.92±8.95 years). Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent revision surgery were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), rate of revision surgery (p=0.027), posterior tamponade (p=0.001), and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF; p=0.034) were significantly higher in Group 1. In patients who underwent revision surgery, ICU stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), posterior pericardial window opening (p=0.026), postoperative inotropic support requirement (p<0.001), tube thoracostomy due to pleural effusion (p=0.002), posterior tamponade (p<0.001), POAF (p<0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump usage (p<0.001) were significantly higher compared to those who did not undergo revision surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve demonstrated that the model's performance in predicting these variables was moderate to good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior pericardiotomy effectively reduces the incidence of POAF and posterior pericardial tamponade without increasing postoperative complications, suggesting it is a beneficial technique in CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"32 4 Suppl 2","pages":"037-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing cardiac tamponade and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: This retrospective study included 384 elective patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2021 and 2024. Patients who underwent posterior pericardiotomy (Group 1) were compared with those who did not (Group 2). Group 1 included 178 patients (135 males, 53 females; mean age: 62.62±8.78 years), while Group 2 included 122 patients (98 males, 24 females, mean age 61.92±8.95 years). Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent revision surgery were analyzed.

Results: Post-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), rate of revision surgery (p=0.027), posterior tamponade (p=0.001), and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF; p=0.034) were significantly higher in Group 1. In patients who underwent revision surgery, ICU stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), posterior pericardial window opening (p=0.026), postoperative inotropic support requirement (p<0.001), tube thoracostomy due to pleural effusion (p=0.002), posterior tamponade (p<0.001), POAF (p<0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump usage (p<0.001) were significantly higher compared to those who did not undergo revision surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve demonstrated that the model's performance in predicting these variables was moderate to good.

Conclusion: Posterior pericardiotomy effectively reduces the incidence of POAF and posterior pericardial tamponade without increasing postoperative complications, suggesting it is a beneficial technique in CABG.

[MSB-18]后心包切开术对孤立性冠状动脉搭桥术术后临床疗效的影响。
目的:本研究旨在评价后路心包切开术对孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者预防心包填塞的效果及其对临床预后的影响。方法:这项回顾性研究包括384例在2021年至2024年间接受孤立CABG的选择性患者。将接受后心包切开术的患者(组1)与未接受后心包切开术的患者(组2)进行比较。第一组178例,其中男性135例,女性53例;平均年龄62.62±8.78岁),第二组122例(男98例,女24例,平均年龄61.92±8.95岁)。对行翻修手术患者的临床结果进行分析。结论:后心包切开术可有效降低POAF和心包后填塞的发生率,且不增加术后并发症,是一种有益的CABG技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信