{"title":"[MSB-18] Impact of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.","authors":"Ufuk Türkmen, Görkem Yiğit, Kudret Atakan Tekin, Ayla Ece Çelikten, Ertekin Utku Ünal","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing cardiac tamponade and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 384 elective patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2021 and 2024. Patients who underwent posterior pericardiotomy (Group 1) were compared with those who did not (Group 2). Group 1 included 178 patients (135 males, 53 females; mean age: 62.62±8.78 years), while Group 2 included 122 patients (98 males, 24 females, mean age 61.92±8.95 years). Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent revision surgery were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), rate of revision surgery (p=0.027), posterior tamponade (p=0.001), and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF; p=0.034) were significantly higher in Group 1. In patients who underwent revision surgery, ICU stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), posterior pericardial window opening (p=0.026), postoperative inotropic support requirement (p<0.001), tube thoracostomy due to pleural effusion (p=0.002), posterior tamponade (p<0.001), POAF (p<0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump usage (p<0.001) were significantly higher compared to those who did not undergo revision surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve demonstrated that the model's performance in predicting these variables was moderate to good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior pericardiotomy effectively reduces the incidence of POAF and posterior pericardial tamponade without increasing postoperative complications, suggesting it is a beneficial technique in CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"32 4 Suppl 2","pages":"037-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing cardiac tamponade and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: This retrospective study included 384 elective patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2021 and 2024. Patients who underwent posterior pericardiotomy (Group 1) were compared with those who did not (Group 2). Group 1 included 178 patients (135 males, 53 females; mean age: 62.62±8.78 years), while Group 2 included 122 patients (98 males, 24 females, mean age 61.92±8.95 years). Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent revision surgery were analyzed.
Results: Post-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), rate of revision surgery (p=0.027), posterior tamponade (p=0.001), and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF; p=0.034) were significantly higher in Group 1. In patients who underwent revision surgery, ICU stay (p<0.001), total hospital stay (p<0.001), posterior pericardial window opening (p=0.026), postoperative inotropic support requirement (p<0.001), tube thoracostomy due to pleural effusion (p=0.002), posterior tamponade (p<0.001), POAF (p<0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump usage (p<0.001) were significantly higher compared to those who did not undergo revision surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve demonstrated that the model's performance in predicting these variables was moderate to good.
Conclusion: Posterior pericardiotomy effectively reduces the incidence of POAF and posterior pericardial tamponade without increasing postoperative complications, suggesting it is a beneficial technique in CABG.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.