Development of a Short Version of the Dissociation Questionnaire (sDIS-Q) : Assessment of Its Psychometric Properties within a Non-Clinical and Clinical Sample.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
A Vancappel, R Chkili, H Kerbage, A Leroy, W El-Hage
{"title":"Development of a Short Version of the Dissociation Questionnaire (sDIS-Q) : Assessment of Its Psychometric Properties within a Non-Clinical and Clinical Sample.","authors":"A Vancappel, R Chkili, H Kerbage, A Leroy, W El-Hage","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2025.2503718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dissociation is a prevalent phenomenon. Existing psychometric tools for measuring dissociation have faced several criticisms. The Dissociation Questionnaire (DIS-Q) is a noteworthy tool but suffers from being lengthy (63 items) and including non-pathological components of dissociation. This study aims to develop a shorter version of the DIS-Q (sDIS-Q) that focuses on the core pathological manifestations of dissociation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited 511 participants from the non-clinical sample and used archival data from 86 patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They completed the DIS-Q along with other questionnaires assessing related psychological mechanisms (e.g. PTSD, emotion regulation, beliefs about dissociation). Drawing on the expertise of clinicians, we selected items that were more indicative of pathological forms of dissociation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a two-factor structure of the sDIS-Q. The first factor was associated with perceived detachment, while the second was related to amnesia. The fit indices were satisfactory in both the non-clinical and the clinical sample. We also observed good internal consistency (α=[.89-.91]) and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sDIS-Q is a reliable tool that can be used in both clinical and research settings. Its shorter length is beneficial for patients, researchers, and clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2025.2503718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dissociation is a prevalent phenomenon. Existing psychometric tools for measuring dissociation have faced several criticisms. The Dissociation Questionnaire (DIS-Q) is a noteworthy tool but suffers from being lengthy (63 items) and including non-pathological components of dissociation. This study aims to develop a shorter version of the DIS-Q (sDIS-Q) that focuses on the core pathological manifestations of dissociation.

Method: We recruited 511 participants from the non-clinical sample and used archival data from 86 patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They completed the DIS-Q along with other questionnaires assessing related psychological mechanisms (e.g. PTSD, emotion regulation, beliefs about dissociation). Drawing on the expertise of clinicians, we selected items that were more indicative of pathological forms of dissociation.

Results: We identified a two-factor structure of the sDIS-Q. The first factor was associated with perceived detachment, while the second was related to amnesia. The fit indices were satisfactory in both the non-clinical and the clinical sample. We also observed good internal consistency (α=[.89-.91]) and concurrent validity.

Conclusion: The sDIS-Q is a reliable tool that can be used in both clinical and research settings. Its shorter length is beneficial for patients, researchers, and clinicians.

开发一个简短版本的解离问卷(sDIS-Q):在非临床和临床样本中评估其心理测量特性。
解离是一种普遍存在的现象。现有的测量分离的心理测量工具面临着一些批评。解离问卷(DIS-Q)是一个值得注意的工具,但其缺点是冗长(63项),并包括解离的非病理成分。本研究旨在开发一个更短版本的DIS-Q (sDIS-Q),专注于解离的核心病理表现。方法:我们从非临床样本中招募了511名参与者,并使用了86名创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的档案资料。他们完成了DIS-Q以及其他评估相关心理机制的问卷(如创伤后应激障碍、情绪调节、关于分离的信念)。利用临床医生的专业知识,我们选择了更能说明病理形式的分离的项目。结果:我们确定了sDIS-Q的双因子结构。第一个因素与感知疏离有关,而第二个因素与健忘症有关。非临床样本和临床样本的拟合指标均令人满意。我们还观察到良好的内部一致性(α=[.89-.91])和并发效度。结论:sDIS-Q是一种可靠的工具,可用于临床和研究。其较短的长度有利于患者,研究人员和临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信