Patient perspectives of jail based MOUD treatment: views of individuals who have returned to the community following incarceration.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Claudia Santelices, Warren Ferguson, Rebecca Rottapel, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Elizabeth Evans, Thomas Stopka, Peter Friedmann
{"title":"Patient perspectives of jail based MOUD treatment: views of individuals who have returned to the community following incarceration.","authors":"Claudia Santelices, Warren Ferguson, Rebecca Rottapel, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Elizabeth Evans, Thomas Stopka, Peter Friedmann","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00319-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Massachusetts passed legislation in 2018 to mandate provision of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in select jails to address the high risk of opioid overdose after release. Since 2019, we have conducted a Type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of this program. We present findings on the perspectives and experiences of persons treated in these jails.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative analyses of semi-structured interviews that were conducted in 2022 with 38 adults released to the community who had been treated with MOUD while living in one of eight Massachusetts jails. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework informed development of the interview guide and analysis of qualitative data. Deductive and inductive strategies were used for coding and analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 41.5 years old; predominantly male; 84.2% white, 23.7% Hispanic/Latino and 7.9% Black; and most continued taking MOUD. Thematic analysis focused on four code reports: Perception of Addiction/MOUD, Barriers/Facilitators, Impact of MOUD in Jails, and Stigma. Participants perceived that MOUD helped to prevent relapse. Prompt and consistent access to medication, and respectful treatment by healthcare and carceral staff were highlighted as facilitators. In contrast, some participants perceived that policy-centered rather than patient-centered treatment drove timing of medication initiation or response to medication changes. Insufficient staffing and the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to treatment delays. Overall, individuals incarcerated in jails that have expanded treatment eligibility to include earlier induction with MOUD generally felt more positive about their experience than individuals reporting delayed induction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants valued the ability of jail based MOUD programs to help clients achieve recovery from OUD. Their perceptions highlight the intrinsic value of MOUD programs that promote and support wellbeing through a person-centered approach to treatment. Participants stressed that MOUD programs should be patient-centered and guided by patients' symptoms and needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00319-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Massachusetts passed legislation in 2018 to mandate provision of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in select jails to address the high risk of opioid overdose after release. Since 2019, we have conducted a Type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of this program. We present findings on the perspectives and experiences of persons treated in these jails.

Methods: We conducted qualitative analyses of semi-structured interviews that were conducted in 2022 with 38 adults released to the community who had been treated with MOUD while living in one of eight Massachusetts jails. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework informed development of the interview guide and analysis of qualitative data. Deductive and inductive strategies were used for coding and analyses.

Results: Participants were 41.5 years old; predominantly male; 84.2% white, 23.7% Hispanic/Latino and 7.9% Black; and most continued taking MOUD. Thematic analysis focused on four code reports: Perception of Addiction/MOUD, Barriers/Facilitators, Impact of MOUD in Jails, and Stigma. Participants perceived that MOUD helped to prevent relapse. Prompt and consistent access to medication, and respectful treatment by healthcare and carceral staff were highlighted as facilitators. In contrast, some participants perceived that policy-centered rather than patient-centered treatment drove timing of medication initiation or response to medication changes. Insufficient staffing and the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to treatment delays. Overall, individuals incarcerated in jails that have expanded treatment eligibility to include earlier induction with MOUD generally felt more positive about their experience than individuals reporting delayed induction.

Conclusions: Participants valued the ability of jail based MOUD programs to help clients achieve recovery from OUD. Their perceptions highlight the intrinsic value of MOUD programs that promote and support wellbeing through a person-centered approach to treatment. Participants stressed that MOUD programs should be patient-centered and guided by patients' symptoms and needs.

基于监狱的mod治疗的患者观点:监禁后返回社区的个人观点。
背景:马萨诸塞州于2018年通过立法,要求在选定的监狱中提供阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物,以解决释放后阿片类药物过量的高风险。自2019年以来,我们对该计划进行了1型混合效果-实施研究。我们提出了关于在这些监狱中受到待遇的人的观点和经历的调查结果。方法:我们对2022年进行的半结构化访谈进行了定性分析,访谈对象是38名被释放到社区的成年人,他们在马萨诸塞州8所监狱之一的监狱中接受过mod治疗。探索、准备、实施和维持(EPIS)框架为访谈指南的制定和定性数据的分析提供了信息。采用演绎和归纳策略进行编码和分析。结果:参与者年龄41.5岁;主要是男性;白人84.2%,西班牙裔/拉丁裔23.7%,黑人7.9%;大多数人继续服用mod。专题分析侧重于四个代码报告:成瘾/ mod的感知、障碍/促进者、mod在监狱中的影响和耻辱。参与者认为mod有助于防止复发。他们强调,及时和持续地获得药物以及保健和护理人员的尊重对待是促进因素。相比之下,一些参与者认为以政策为中心而不是以患者为中心的治疗决定了药物开始的时间或对药物变化的反应。人手不足和COVID-19大流行造成了治疗延误。总的来说,在监狱中被监禁的人扩大了治疗资格,包括更早的mod诱导,他们对自己的经历比那些报告延迟诱导的人更积极。结论:参与者重视基于监狱的戒毒计划帮助案主从戒毒中恢复的能力。他们的观点强调了mod项目的内在价值,即通过以人为本的治疗方法来促进和支持健康。与会者强调,mod项目应以患者为中心,以患者的症状和需求为导向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信