[Comparison between transoral minimally invasive surgery and Sistrunk surgery for the treatment of lingual thyroglossal duct cyst].

Q4 Medicine
P J Zhang, X F Tian
{"title":"[Comparison between transoral minimally invasive surgery and Sistrunk surgery for the treatment of lingual thyroglossal duct cyst].","authors":"P J Zhang, X F Tian","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240831-00500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of transoral minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of lingual thyroglossal duct cyst(LTGDC) by comparison with Sistrunk surgery. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical data of 34 patients with LTGDC were analyzed retrospectively at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2019 to August 2023. Among these patients, comprising 26 males, 8 females, aged from 1 year and 11 months to 76 years old, with a mean age of 31 years old, 22 patients underwent transoral minimally invasive surgery and 12 patients underwent Sistrunk surgery. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, recovery time and follow-up information of the two groups were analyzed. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 65 months. An independent sample <i>t</i>-test was used to analyze the surgical duration between the two groups, while the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was employed to analyze data on age, cyst size, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences in gender, age and size of the cysts between the two groups(all <i>P</i>>0.05). For the transoral minimally invasive group, the mean operation time was (75.5±20.2) minutes, median intraoperative blood loss volume was 5.0(5.0, 10.0)ml and median recovery time was 9.0(8.0, 10.0)days. The data of Sistrunk group were (131.7±16.8) min, 27.5(20.0, 40.0)ml, 11.0(10.0, 15.0)days respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(<i>Z</i>=-8.192, -4.539, -3.71, all <i>P</i><0.001). In the transoral group, there were three recurrences, two patients subsequently underwent Sistrunk surgery, while one opted for continuous observation. Additionally, one patient experienced partial loss of epiglottic cartilage.Four patients in the Sistrunk group developed a pharyngeal fistula, but there were no reported recurrences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared to Sistrunk surgery, transoral surgery for lingual thyroglossal duct cyst provides several benefits, such as reduced complication rates, accelerated recovery, and the absence of neck scarring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 4","pages":"435-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240831-00500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of transoral minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of lingual thyroglossal duct cyst(LTGDC) by comparison with Sistrunk surgery. Methods: The clinical data of 34 patients with LTGDC were analyzed retrospectively at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2019 to August 2023. Among these patients, comprising 26 males, 8 females, aged from 1 year and 11 months to 76 years old, with a mean age of 31 years old, 22 patients underwent transoral minimally invasive surgery and 12 patients underwent Sistrunk surgery. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, recovery time and follow-up information of the two groups were analyzed. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 65 months. An independent sample t-test was used to analyze the surgical duration between the two groups, while the Mann-Whitney U test was employed to analyze data on age, cyst size, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in gender, age and size of the cysts between the two groups(all P>0.05). For the transoral minimally invasive group, the mean operation time was (75.5±20.2) minutes, median intraoperative blood loss volume was 5.0(5.0, 10.0)ml and median recovery time was 9.0(8.0, 10.0)days. The data of Sistrunk group were (131.7±16.8) min, 27.5(20.0, 40.0)ml, 11.0(10.0, 15.0)days respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(Z=-8.192, -4.539, -3.71, all P<0.001). In the transoral group, there were three recurrences, two patients subsequently underwent Sistrunk surgery, while one opted for continuous observation. Additionally, one patient experienced partial loss of epiglottic cartilage.Four patients in the Sistrunk group developed a pharyngeal fistula, but there were no reported recurrences. Conclusions: Compared to Sistrunk surgery, transoral surgery for lingual thyroglossal duct cyst provides several benefits, such as reduced complication rates, accelerated recovery, and the absence of neck scarring.

[经口微创手术与Sistrunk手术治疗舌甲状腺舌管囊肿的比较]。
目的:通过与Sistrunk手术的比较,评价经口微创手术治疗舌甲状舌管囊肿(LTGDC)的可行性和疗效。方法:回顾性分析郑州大学第一附属医院2019年3月至2023年8月34例LTGDC患者的临床资料。其中男性26例,女性8例,年龄1岁11个月~ 76岁,平均年龄31岁,行经口微创手术22例,行Sistrunk手术12例。分析两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、恢复时间及随访情况。随访期为12至65个月。两组手术时间采用独立样本t检验,两组年龄、囊肿大小、术中出血量、住院时间采用Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:两组患者的性别、年龄、囊肿大小差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。经口微创组平均手术时间为(75.5±20.2)min,术中出血量中位数为5.0(5.0,10.0)ml,恢复时间中位数为9.0(8.0,10.0)d。Sistrunk组数据分别为(131.7±16.8)min、27.5(20.0,40.0)ml、11.0(10.0,15.0)d。两组间差异有统计学意义(Z=-8.192, -4.539, -3.71,均p < 0.05)。结论:经口手术治疗舌甲状舌管囊肿与Sistrunk手术相比,具有并发症发生率低、恢复速度快、无颈部瘢痕形成等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信