[Qualitative Research Focusing on the Psychology of Patients and Pharmacists: What I Learned from Discussions with Students During Graduation Research Guidance].

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rieko Takehira
{"title":"[Qualitative Research Focusing on the Psychology of Patients and Pharmacists: What I Learned from Discussions with Students During Graduation Research Guidance].","authors":"Rieko Takehira","doi":"10.1248/yakushi.24-00167-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the 2022 version of the Model Core Curriculum for Pharmacy Education, scientific inquiry is highlighted as a crucial professional competency for pharmacists. Graduation research offers pharmacy students an excellent opportunity to develop an inquisitive and scientific perspective. While various types of pharmacy-related research exist, qualitative research is essential for understanding human psychology and behavior. At the laboratory where I am affiliated, students undertake qualitative research focused on the psychological aspects of patients and pharmacists as their graduation research themes. Students conducting qualitative research encounter various challenges. For instance, they might (1) rephrase text data using inappropriate terms when coding or (2) select unsuitable terms due to a lack of contextual understanding of the text data. My goal during graduate research supervision is to provide tailored guidance based on students' common analytical errors. Furthermore, to support students' independent research efforts, I engage in thorough discussions with them regarding the appropriateness of the coded terms they use. Even if these interventions seem inefficient, the persistent repetition of conversations with students is believed to enhance their scientific inquiry skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":23810,"journal":{"name":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","volume":"145 5","pages":"421-426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.24-00167-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 2022 version of the Model Core Curriculum for Pharmacy Education, scientific inquiry is highlighted as a crucial professional competency for pharmacists. Graduation research offers pharmacy students an excellent opportunity to develop an inquisitive and scientific perspective. While various types of pharmacy-related research exist, qualitative research is essential for understanding human psychology and behavior. At the laboratory where I am affiliated, students undertake qualitative research focused on the psychological aspects of patients and pharmacists as their graduation research themes. Students conducting qualitative research encounter various challenges. For instance, they might (1) rephrase text data using inappropriate terms when coding or (2) select unsuitable terms due to a lack of contextual understanding of the text data. My goal during graduate research supervision is to provide tailored guidance based on students' common analytical errors. Furthermore, to support students' independent research efforts, I engage in thorough discussions with them regarding the appropriateness of the coded terms they use. Even if these interventions seem inefficient, the persistent repetition of conversations with students is believed to enhance their scientific inquiry skills.

【以患者与药师心理为中心的质性研究:毕业科研指导中与学生讨论的心得】。
在2022年版的《药学教育核心课程示范》中,科学探究被强调为药剂师的一项重要专业能力。毕业研究为药学专业的学生提供了一个培养探究和科学视角的绝佳机会。虽然存在各种类型的药学相关研究,但定性研究对于理解人类心理和行为至关重要。在我所在的实验室,学生们进行定性研究,重点关注患者和药剂师的心理方面,作为他们的毕业研究主题。进行定性研究的学生会遇到各种各样的挑战。例如,他们可能(1)在编码时使用不合适的术语重新表述文本数据,或者(2)由于缺乏对文本数据的上下文理解而选择不合适的术语。我在研究生研究指导期间的目标是针对学生常见的分析错误提供有针对性的指导。此外,为了支持学生的独立研究工作,我与他们就他们使用的编码术语的适当性进行了深入的讨论。即使这些干预看起来效率低下,与学生持续重复的对话被认为可以提高他们的科学探究技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信