Use of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM) in Routine hospital Outpatient Care for Kids (ROCK): A qualitative exploration of adolescent, caregiver and service provider perspectives (P-PROM ROCK Phase 1).

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Harriet Hiscock, Alexander van Heudsen, Nancy Devlin
{"title":"Use of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM) in Routine hospital Outpatient Care for Kids (ROCK): A qualitative exploration of adolescent, caregiver and service provider perspectives (P-PROM ROCK Phase 1).","authors":"Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Harriet Hiscock, Alexander van Heudsen, Nancy Devlin","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-03990-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore patient, caregiver, and service provider perspectives on the implementation of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM), their perspectives on the EQ-5D-Y-5L, and to consider how these insights can be used to co-design routine use of EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric outpatient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescent patients, caregivers, and providers (allied health, nurses, doctors) who had provided or received outpatient care at The Royal Children's Hospital, Australia. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis and subsequent themes were mapped to an acceptability framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews were conducted in June and July 2023 with six service providers, five caregivers and three adolescent patients. Despite service provider concerns that generic P-PROMs may be too broad; all were open to their use. Participants did not see value in patients simply completing a generic P-PROM; it was emphasised that such information needed to be used and responded to. Participants were largely supportive of using the EQ-5D-Y-5L in clinical care, although some were concerned about the short recall period and negative framing. Displaying EQ-5D-Y-5L responses by item was preferred by participants. These different perspectives were summarised into enablers and barriers of acceptability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perspectives gathered from this study highlight that generic P-PROMs, such as EQ-5D-Y-5L, may have potential for use in paediatric outpatient care. However, to have a meaningful impact, careful consideration is needed regarding implementation. Results have informed co-design of the P-PROM ROCK Program.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03990-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore patient, caregiver, and service provider perspectives on the implementation of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM), their perspectives on the EQ-5D-Y-5L, and to consider how these insights can be used to co-design routine use of EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric outpatient care.

Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescent patients, caregivers, and providers (allied health, nurses, doctors) who had provided or received outpatient care at The Royal Children's Hospital, Australia. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis and subsequent themes were mapped to an acceptability framework.

Results: Interviews were conducted in June and July 2023 with six service providers, five caregivers and three adolescent patients. Despite service provider concerns that generic P-PROMs may be too broad; all were open to their use. Participants did not see value in patients simply completing a generic P-PROM; it was emphasised that such information needed to be used and responded to. Participants were largely supportive of using the EQ-5D-Y-5L in clinical care, although some were concerned about the short recall period and negative framing. Displaying EQ-5D-Y-5L responses by item was preferred by participants. These different perspectives were summarised into enablers and barriers of acceptability.

Conclusions: Perspectives gathered from this study highlight that generic P-PROMs, such as EQ-5D-Y-5L, may have potential for use in paediatric outpatient care. However, to have a meaningful impact, careful consideration is needed regarding implementation. Results have informed co-design of the P-PROM ROCK Program.

在儿童常规医院门诊护理(ROCK)中使用通用儿科患者报告结果测量(P-PROM):青少年,护理人员和服务提供者视角的定性探索(P-PROM ROCK第1期)。
目的:探讨患者、护理人员和服务提供者对实施通用儿科患者报告结果测量(P-PROM)的看法,他们对EQ-5D-Y-5L的看法,并考虑如何将这些见解用于共同设计儿科门诊护理中EQ-5D-Y-5L的常规使用。方法:对在澳大利亚皇家儿童医院提供或接受门诊治疗的青少年患者、护理人员和提供者(专职健康人员、护士、医生)进行了个人半结构化访谈。使用框架分析分析访谈记录,并将随后的主题映射到可接受性框架。结果:于2023年6月至7月对6名服务提供者、5名照顾者和3名青少年患者进行了访谈。尽管服务提供商担心通用p - prom可能过于宽泛;所有这些都是开放的。参与者没有看到患者仅仅完成通用P-PROM的价值;有人强调,需要利用和回应这些资料。大部分参与者支持在临床护理中使用EQ-5D-Y-5L,尽管有些人担心回忆期短和消极框架。被试倾向于按项目显示EQ-5D-Y-5L反应。这些不同的观点被总结为可接受性的促成因素和障碍。结论:从本研究中收集的观点强调,通用P-PROMs,如EQ-5D-Y-5L,可能有潜力用于儿科门诊护理。然而,要产生有意义的影响,就需要仔细考虑执行情况。研究结果为P-PROM岩石程序的协同设计提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信