Bowel regimen medication use and its effect on bowel movements in a pediatric intensive care unit: A retrospective study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1002/ncp.11300
Emmanuel Messele, Samuel Hickey, Susan Hamilton, Alireza Akhondi-Asl, Tracy Walton, Thomas Kuriakose, Nilesh M Mehta, Enid E Martinez
{"title":"Bowel regimen medication use and its effect on bowel movements in a pediatric intensive care unit: A retrospective study.","authors":"Emmanuel Messele, Samuel Hickey, Susan Hamilton, Alireza Akhondi-Asl, Tracy Walton, Thomas Kuriakose, Nilesh M Mehta, Enid E Martinez","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Constipation affects up to 50% of critically ill children and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The best approach to promote bowel movements in critically ill children is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study including children admitted for >24 h to an intensive care unit who received enteral nutrition (EN). Demographic and clinical characteristics, ordered and administered bowel regimen medications (categorized into enteral softener/osmotic, enteral/intravenous stimulant agents, and rectal softener/osmotic agents), and number of bowel movements were collected for the first 4 days of EN. A multistate model analysis, controlling for severity of illness, assessed the probability of having a bowel movement based on exposure to the categories of medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 121 patients, median age 53 months (<1 month, 118 months) and 45% female. A medication was ordered for 77 of 121 (64%) patients and administered in 59 of 77 (77%). Enteral softener/osmotic agents were ordered in 64%-90% and rectal agents in 38%-56% of instances. The multistate model analysis identified a greater probability of having a bowel movement after receiving a rectal agent for 1 or 2 days compared with other agents. The most common reason for an ordered medication not being administered was an \"as needed\" order status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rectal agents, the least ordered/administered medication category, were the most effective. Ordering medications in an \"as needed\" order status reduced the rate of administration. These findings suggest practical changes that may improve the prevention and management of constipation in pediatric critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"922-930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Constipation affects up to 50% of critically ill children and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The best approach to promote bowel movements in critically ill children is not known.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study including children admitted for >24 h to an intensive care unit who received enteral nutrition (EN). Demographic and clinical characteristics, ordered and administered bowel regimen medications (categorized into enteral softener/osmotic, enteral/intravenous stimulant agents, and rectal softener/osmotic agents), and number of bowel movements were collected for the first 4 days of EN. A multistate model analysis, controlling for severity of illness, assessed the probability of having a bowel movement based on exposure to the categories of medications.

Results: We included 121 patients, median age 53 months (<1 month, 118 months) and 45% female. A medication was ordered for 77 of 121 (64%) patients and administered in 59 of 77 (77%). Enteral softener/osmotic agents were ordered in 64%-90% and rectal agents in 38%-56% of instances. The multistate model analysis identified a greater probability of having a bowel movement after receiving a rectal agent for 1 or 2 days compared with other agents. The most common reason for an ordered medication not being administered was an "as needed" order status.

Conclusion: Rectal agents, the least ordered/administered medication category, were the most effective. Ordering medications in an "as needed" order status reduced the rate of administration. These findings suggest practical changes that may improve the prevention and management of constipation in pediatric critical illness.

儿科重症监护病房肠道治疗方案药物使用及其对肠道运动的影响:一项回顾性研究。
背景:便秘影响高达50%的危重儿童,并与不良临床结果相关。促进危重儿童排便的最佳方法尚不清楚。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括在重症监护室接受肠内营养(EN)治疗的bbbb24 h的儿童。收集EN前4天的人口统计学和临床特征、订购和使用的肠道方案药物(分为肠内软性/渗透性、肠内/静脉兴奋剂和直肠软性/渗透性药物)以及排便次数。一项控制疾病严重程度的多状态模型分析,评估了基于药物种类暴露的排便概率。结果:我们纳入121例患者,中位年龄53个月(结论:直肠药物,最少订购/给药的药物类别,是最有效的。在“按需”状态下订购药物降低了给药率。这些发现提示了可能改善儿科危重疾病中便秘的预防和管理的实际变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信