McNamara analysis comparison between Indigenous and Chinese ethnic with skeletal class I malocclusion in Medan.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_92_24
Ervina Sofyanti, Angeline Christy, Felix Edwin, Maria Sitanggang, Erliera Sufarnap, Zamri Radzi
{"title":"McNamara analysis comparison between Indigenous and Chinese ethnic with skeletal class I malocclusion in Medan.","authors":"Ervina Sofyanti, Angeline Christy, Felix Edwin, Maria Sitanggang, Erliera Sufarnap, Zamri Radzi","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_92_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare lateral cephalometric variables based on McNamara analysis between Indigenous and Chinese-Indonesian ethnic patients with skeletal class I malocclusion from Medan city.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Simple random sampling of retrospective data from pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of orthodontic adult patients of three successive generations of the Mongoloid race in Medan from 2015 to 2023. Thus, the <i>unpaired t</i>-test and <i>Mann-Whitney</i> test were conducted after the normality test to compare the cephalometric analysis between Indigenous and Chinese-Indonesian ethnicities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed 32 Indigenous and 34 Chinese ethnic lateral cephalograms. There were significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between Indigenous and Chinese ethnic in the lower pharynx, nasolabial angle, A to N perpendicular, maxillomandibular differential, and Pog to N Perpendicular variables for skeletal parameters. There were also significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) in nasolabial angle for the soft tissue parameter and lower pharynx for the airway parameter. Conversely, there were no significant differences (<i>P</i> > 0.05) between these groups in the Co-A, Co-gnathion, lower anterior facial height (LAFH), facial axis angle, and mandibular plane angle for skeletal parameters. There were also no significant differences (<i>P</i> > 0.05) in upper incisor to A and lower incisor to A-Pog for dental parameters. Furthermore, there were also no significant differences (<i>P</i> > 0.05) in cant of the upper lip for soft tissue parameters and upper pharynx for airway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is advisable to consider certain landmarks and reference lines based on McNamara cephalometry parameters that showed a significant difference between Indigenous and Chinese ethnic groups with skeletal class I malocclusion when determining diagnosis and formulating individualized orthodontic treatment plans for multiethnic subpopulation patients in Medan.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"14 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_92_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare lateral cephalometric variables based on McNamara analysis between Indigenous and Chinese-Indonesian ethnic patients with skeletal class I malocclusion from Medan city.

Materials and methods: Simple random sampling of retrospective data from pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of orthodontic adult patients of three successive generations of the Mongoloid race in Medan from 2015 to 2023. Thus, the unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney test were conducted after the normality test to compare the cephalometric analysis between Indigenous and Chinese-Indonesian ethnicities.

Results: This cross-sectional study analyzed 32 Indigenous and 34 Chinese ethnic lateral cephalograms. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) between Indigenous and Chinese ethnic in the lower pharynx, nasolabial angle, A to N perpendicular, maxillomandibular differential, and Pog to N Perpendicular variables for skeletal parameters. There were also significant differences (P < 0.05) in nasolabial angle for the soft tissue parameter and lower pharynx for the airway parameter. Conversely, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between these groups in the Co-A, Co-gnathion, lower anterior facial height (LAFH), facial axis angle, and mandibular plane angle for skeletal parameters. There were also no significant differences (P > 0.05) in upper incisor to A and lower incisor to A-Pog for dental parameters. Furthermore, there were also no significant differences (P > 0.05) in cant of the upper lip for soft tissue parameters and upper pharynx for airway.

Conclusions: It is advisable to consider certain landmarks and reference lines based on McNamara cephalometry parameters that showed a significant difference between Indigenous and Chinese ethnic groups with skeletal class I malocclusion when determining diagnosis and formulating individualized orthodontic treatment plans for multiethnic subpopulation patients in Medan.

棉兰原住民与华人ⅰ类骨骼错颌的麦克纳马拉分析比较。
目的:比较棉兰市原住民和华裔印尼人I类骨骼错颌畸形患者的侧位测量变量。材料与方法:简单随机抽样2015 - 2023年棉兰地区蒙古人种连续三代正畸成人患者治疗前侧位脑电图回顾性资料。因此,在正态性检验之后,进行了非配对t检验和Mann-Whitney检验来比较土着民族和华裔印度尼西亚民族的头测量分析。结果:本横断面研究分析了32例土著和34例汉族侧位脑电图。原住民与华人在下咽部、鼻唇角、A - N垂直、上下颌差、Pog - N垂直等骨骼参数上差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。软组织参数的鼻唇角和气道参数的下咽角差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。相反,两组间Co-A、Co-gnathion、下前面高(LAFH)、面轴角和下颌平面角的骨骼参数差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。上切牙与A、下切牙与A- pog的牙参数差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间软组织参数上唇和气道参数上咽差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:棉兰多民族亚群患者在确定诊断和制定个体化正畸治疗方案时,应考虑基于McNamara头象测量参数显示土著和中国民族骨骼I类错牙合有显著差异的标志和参考线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信