Tailoring exercise intensity: Acute and chronic effects of constant-speed and heart rate-clamped exercise in healthy, inactive adults.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Raffaele Mazzolari, Patrick Rodrigues, Anne Hecksteden
{"title":"Tailoring exercise intensity: Acute and chronic effects of constant-speed and heart rate-clamped exercise in healthy, inactive adults.","authors":"Raffaele Mazzolari, Patrick Rodrigues, Anne Hecksteden","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2025.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study tested whether speed-controlled exercise prescriptions result in greater external training load and acute cardiorespiratory responses at the end of exercise compared to heart rate-controlled prescriptions, despite equivalent intensity at the start of exercise. It also investigated whether speed-controlled prescriptions lead to greater improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness after 8 weeks of training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A two-group, randomized block design with repeated testing sessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four healthy, inactive adults were randomized into two groups. One group trained at a constant speed set midway between the first and second lactate thresholds, whereas the other trained at the corresponding heart rate. Both groups performed 30 min of continuous exercise three times per week for 8 weeks. Speed, heart rate, and oxygen consumption were measured at the end of the first session and later time points for complementary analysis. Peak treadmill speed and maximal oxygen consumption were assessed before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the first session, the speed group showed higher values compared to the heart rate group for speed (1.5 km/h), heart rate (22 bpm), and oxygen consumption (6.0 mL/kg/min) (all p < 0.001). Similarly, adaptive changes were greater in the speed group, with a larger increase in peak treadmill speed (0.9 km/h, p < 0.001) and maximal oxygen consumption (1.2 mL/kg/min, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that the exercise intensity reference method influences acute responses and chronic adaptations to exercise in healthy, inactive adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.04.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study tested whether speed-controlled exercise prescriptions result in greater external training load and acute cardiorespiratory responses at the end of exercise compared to heart rate-controlled prescriptions, despite equivalent intensity at the start of exercise. It also investigated whether speed-controlled prescriptions lead to greater improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness after 8 weeks of training.

Design: A two-group, randomized block design with repeated testing sessions.

Methods: Thirty-four healthy, inactive adults were randomized into two groups. One group trained at a constant speed set midway between the first and second lactate thresholds, whereas the other trained at the corresponding heart rate. Both groups performed 30 min of continuous exercise three times per week for 8 weeks. Speed, heart rate, and oxygen consumption were measured at the end of the first session and later time points for complementary analysis. Peak treadmill speed and maximal oxygen consumption were assessed before and after the intervention.

Results: At the end of the first session, the speed group showed higher values compared to the heart rate group for speed (1.5 km/h), heart rate (22 bpm), and oxygen consumption (6.0 mL/kg/min) (all p < 0.001). Similarly, adaptive changes were greater in the speed group, with a larger increase in peak treadmill speed (0.9 km/h, p < 0.001) and maximal oxygen consumption (1.2 mL/kg/min, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: These findings indicate that the exercise intensity reference method influences acute responses and chronic adaptations to exercise in healthy, inactive adults.

调整运动强度:在健康、不运动的成年人中,匀速和心率限制运动的急性和慢性影响。
目的:本研究测试了速度控制的运动处方是否会导致更大的外部训练负荷和运动结束时的急性心肺反应,而心率控制的处方在运动开始时强度相同。它还调查了8 周的训练后,速度控制处方是否能使心肺健康得到更大的改善。设计:两组随机分组设计,重复测试。方法:34名健康、不运动的成年人随机分为两组。一组以第一和第二乳酸门槛之间的恒定速度训练,而另一组以相应的心率训练。两组均进行30 min的连续运动,每周三次,持续8 周。在第一次治疗结束时测量速度、心率和耗氧量,并在随后的时间点进行补充分析。在干预前后评估跑步机的峰值速度和最大耗氧量。结果:在第一次训练结束时,与心率组相比,速度组在速度(1.5 km/h)、心率(22 bpm)和耗氧量(6.0 mL/kg/min)方面的数值更高(均p )。结论:这些发现表明,运动强度参考方法影响健康、不运动的成年人对运动的急性反应和慢性适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信