Gender disparities in acute coronary syndrome management and prognosis: National multicenter retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
António Rocha de Almeida, Marta Paralta Figueiredo, Rafael Viana, Kisa Congo, Manuel Trinca, Lino Patrício
{"title":"Gender disparities in acute coronary syndrome management and prognosis: National multicenter retrospective cohort study.","authors":"António Rocha de Almeida, Marta Paralta Figueiredo, Rafael Viana, Kisa Congo, Manuel Trinca, Lino Patrício","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender disparity in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still significant, leading to suboptimal treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in women. This study evaluates differences in the management and prognosis of ACS between women and men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective cohort of 6000 patients with ACS was divided according to the patient's gender. CV risk factors, time to first medical care (FMC), and to electrocardiogram (ECG), coronary angiography (CAG), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were evaluated. The outcomes assessed were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), in-hospital and follow-up death, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, and hospital readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6000 patients, 30 % (n = 1784) were female. Women were significantly older (73 ± 13 years vs. 65 ± 13 years, p < 0.001). The time to FMC was longer in women (10.6 h vs. 9.5 h, p < 0.001), and the median time to ECG was similar (101 min vs. 110 min, p = 0.9). Non-ST segment elevation ACS was higher in women [65 % vs 61 % p < 0.001, OR 1.2 (1.1;1.4)]. Women were less likely to undergo CAG [68 % vs. 79 %, p < 0.001, OR 0.6 (0.5;0.7)] and PCI than men [82 % vs. 86 % p < 0.001, OR 0.7 (0.6;0.8)]. Still, unfavorable anatomy cases were comparable (63 % vs 66 %, p = 0.5). Women had less multivessel disease (12 % vs 18 % p < 0.001). Successful PCI was similar among groups (95 % p = 0.9). Women were associated with higher in-hospital death and MACE than men [12 % vs 7 % p < 0.001 OR 1.8 (1.5;2.2) and 7 % vs 5 % p = 0.005, OR 1.5 (1.1;2)]. Women were associated with fewer cardiac rehabilitation referrals [33 % vs 38 % p < 0.001 OR 0.8 (0.7;0.9)]. During the follow-up of 16 ± 7 months, women had a significant association with mortality during follow-up [15 % vs 11 % p < 0.001, OR 1.5 (1.2;1.7)]. Also, women were significantly associated with more hospital readmissions [28 % vs 24 % p = 0.004, OR 1.2 (1.1;1.4)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite enhanced awareness, CVD in women remains underestimated. Women take longer to seek medical care and are less likely to undergo CAG and PCI. This ends in a worse early and long-term prognosis, with higher mortality and MACE on follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.04.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender disparity in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still significant, leading to suboptimal treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in women. This study evaluates differences in the management and prognosis of ACS between women and men.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort of 6000 patients with ACS was divided according to the patient's gender. CV risk factors, time to first medical care (FMC), and to electrocardiogram (ECG), coronary angiography (CAG), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were evaluated. The outcomes assessed were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), in-hospital and follow-up death, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, and hospital readmission.

Results: Of the 6000 patients, 30 % (n = 1784) were female. Women were significantly older (73 ± 13 years vs. 65 ± 13 years, p < 0.001). The time to FMC was longer in women (10.6 h vs. 9.5 h, p < 0.001), and the median time to ECG was similar (101 min vs. 110 min, p = 0.9). Non-ST segment elevation ACS was higher in women [65 % vs 61 % p < 0.001, OR 1.2 (1.1;1.4)]. Women were less likely to undergo CAG [68 % vs. 79 %, p < 0.001, OR 0.6 (0.5;0.7)] and PCI than men [82 % vs. 86 % p < 0.001, OR 0.7 (0.6;0.8)]. Still, unfavorable anatomy cases were comparable (63 % vs 66 %, p = 0.5). Women had less multivessel disease (12 % vs 18 % p < 0.001). Successful PCI was similar among groups (95 % p = 0.9). Women were associated with higher in-hospital death and MACE than men [12 % vs 7 % p < 0.001 OR 1.8 (1.5;2.2) and 7 % vs 5 % p = 0.005, OR 1.5 (1.1;2)]. Women were associated with fewer cardiac rehabilitation referrals [33 % vs 38 % p < 0.001 OR 0.8 (0.7;0.9)]. During the follow-up of 16 ± 7 months, women had a significant association with mortality during follow-up [15 % vs 11 % p < 0.001, OR 1.5 (1.2;1.7)]. Also, women were significantly associated with more hospital readmissions [28 % vs 24 % p = 0.004, OR 1.2 (1.1;1.4)].

Conclusion: Despite enhanced awareness, CVD in women remains underestimated. Women take longer to seek medical care and are less likely to undergo CAG and PCI. This ends in a worse early and long-term prognosis, with higher mortality and MACE on follow-up.

急性冠状动脉综合征管理和预后的性别差异:国家多中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:心血管疾病(CVD)治疗中的性别差异仍然显著,导致女性急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)治疗不理想。本研究评估男女ACS在治疗和预后方面的差异。方法:对6000例ACS患者进行多中心回顾性队列研究,按患者性别分组。评估心血管危险因素、首次就医时间(FMC)、心电图(ECG)、冠状动脉造影(CAG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。评估的结果是主要心脏不良事件(MACE)、院内和随访死亡、转介心脏康复和再入院。结果:6000例患者中,30 % (n = 1784)为女性。女性明显变老(73 ± 13 岁vs. 65 ± 13 岁,p )结论:尽管意识增强,但女性CVD仍被低估。妇女寻求医疗护理的时间更长,接受CAG和PCI的可能性较小。这导致早期和长期预后较差,随访时死亡率和MACE较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信