Zoe Moran, Amber Loh, Annie K Lewis, Paul Kelly, Amy M Dennett
{"title":"Radiographer Preferences for Shoulder x-Ray Imaging in Australia: A National Survey.","authors":"Zoe Moran, Amber Loh, Annie K Lewis, Paul Kelly, Amy M Dennett","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder pathology is common, with many people referred for general radiography examinations. In performing these examinations, radiographers have a choice of more than 15 views to demonstrate the anatomy and pathology. The lack of guidelines for the best combination of orthogonal views in specific scenarios raises concerns for effectiveness, efficiency, and radiation safety. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the current practice by radiographers across Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national, cross-sectional online survey obtained data on the views and combination of views, (protocols) preferred by Australian radiographers across five common pathological presentations. The data were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 164 radiographers found a wide variation in shoulder imaging preferences; however, some common shoulder imaging protocols were identified for shoulder trauma presentations. The most variation and highest number of imaging protocols selected were for shoulder arthritis and impingement. Trauma and glenohumeral dislocation had the least variation and number of views selected. The three most common views across all pathologies were lateral Y scapula, anteroposterior general survey (neutral rotation), and true anteroposterior/Grashey (internal rotation). Radiographers working in private settings selected more views than those in public settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a wide variation in image preferences of Australian radiographers performing shoulder imaging. However, some common shoulder imaging protocols were identified for shoulder trauma presentations. Greater standardisation of shoulder imaging protocols may reduce unnecessary patient risk and improve the patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Shoulder pathology is common, with many people referred for general radiography examinations. In performing these examinations, radiographers have a choice of more than 15 views to demonstrate the anatomy and pathology. The lack of guidelines for the best combination of orthogonal views in specific scenarios raises concerns for effectiveness, efficiency, and radiation safety. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the current practice by radiographers across Australia.
Methods: A national, cross-sectional online survey obtained data on the views and combination of views, (protocols) preferred by Australian radiographers across five common pathological presentations. The data were analysed descriptively.
Results: Data from 164 radiographers found a wide variation in shoulder imaging preferences; however, some common shoulder imaging protocols were identified for shoulder trauma presentations. The most variation and highest number of imaging protocols selected were for shoulder arthritis and impingement. Trauma and glenohumeral dislocation had the least variation and number of views selected. The three most common views across all pathologies were lateral Y scapula, anteroposterior general survey (neutral rotation), and true anteroposterior/Grashey (internal rotation). Radiographers working in private settings selected more views than those in public settings.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates a wide variation in image preferences of Australian radiographers performing shoulder imaging. However, some common shoulder imaging protocols were identified for shoulder trauma presentations. Greater standardisation of shoulder imaging protocols may reduce unnecessary patient risk and improve the patient experience.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).