Lizard anesthesia-a retrospective study of anesthetic protocol and monitoring quality of anesthetic episodes at a veterinary hospital over 23 years (2000-2023).

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Braxton T Gise, Chloe J Thorbrogger, Ashley M Rasys, Jane E Quandt, Stephen J Divers
{"title":"Lizard anesthesia-a retrospective study of anesthetic protocol and monitoring quality of anesthetic episodes at a veterinary hospital over 23 years (2000-2023).","authors":"Braxton T Gise, Chloe J Thorbrogger, Ashley M Rasys, Jane E Quandt, Stephen J Divers","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.11.0728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study's aim was to summarize the anesthetic events of lizards seen at a university hospital, identify challenges with record-keeping, and assess anesthesia-related mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2000 through January 2023, medical records of lizards that underwent general anesthesia were reviewed. Cases with complete anesthesia records were used to assess anesthetic parameters. Collected data included general patient details, diagnosis, procedures, premedication, induction, maintenance, monitoring, and recovery. The recorded duration of each of these periods, when documented, was reported for each patient, alongside what drug protocols were utilized and compiled to give an overarching view of trends in anesthesia at the hospital. The times were also analyzed to assess whether any drug/protocol led to more negative outcomes or prolonged anesthetic duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 anesthetic events were performed. Ninety-nine cases had detailed reports available for analysis. A records review identified issues that frequently resulted in poor record management and highlighted the most used anesthetic agents. For premedications, alfaxalone, butorphanol, midazolam, and hydromorphone were common. During induction, alfaxalone or propofol was the most common. For maintenance, isoflurane and sevoflurane were comparable, while alfaxalone was favored for noninhalants. Of the 99 cases analyzed, 95 recovered, 3 were euthanatized due to poor prognosis, and 1 failed to recover; the 1 that failed to recover had significant underlying disease identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The trend of maintenance alfaxalone constant rate infusions replacing inhalants is the major development. The records for anesthesia have improved over time, with the exception of anesthesia time records. It is recommended to implement an automated system that records vitals intermittently alongside implementation of an updated anesthesia sheet with areas dedicated to common research values.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>General anesthesia can be reliably and safely undertaken in lizards without severe pre-existing disease. Efforts should focus on identifying preexisting disease, creating uniform systems for assessing anesthetic stages, and limiting record-keeping variance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.11.0728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study's aim was to summarize the anesthetic events of lizards seen at a university hospital, identify challenges with record-keeping, and assess anesthesia-related mortality.

Methods: From October 2000 through January 2023, medical records of lizards that underwent general anesthesia were reviewed. Cases with complete anesthesia records were used to assess anesthetic parameters. Collected data included general patient details, diagnosis, procedures, premedication, induction, maintenance, monitoring, and recovery. The recorded duration of each of these periods, when documented, was reported for each patient, alongside what drug protocols were utilized and compiled to give an overarching view of trends in anesthesia at the hospital. The times were also analyzed to assess whether any drug/protocol led to more negative outcomes or prolonged anesthetic duration.

Results: A total of 104 anesthetic events were performed. Ninety-nine cases had detailed reports available for analysis. A records review identified issues that frequently resulted in poor record management and highlighted the most used anesthetic agents. For premedications, alfaxalone, butorphanol, midazolam, and hydromorphone were common. During induction, alfaxalone or propofol was the most common. For maintenance, isoflurane and sevoflurane were comparable, while alfaxalone was favored for noninhalants. Of the 99 cases analyzed, 95 recovered, 3 were euthanatized due to poor prognosis, and 1 failed to recover; the 1 that failed to recover had significant underlying disease identified.

Conclusions: The trend of maintenance alfaxalone constant rate infusions replacing inhalants is the major development. The records for anesthesia have improved over time, with the exception of anesthesia time records. It is recommended to implement an automated system that records vitals intermittently alongside implementation of an updated anesthesia sheet with areas dedicated to common research values.

Clinical relevance: General anesthesia can be reliably and safely undertaken in lizards without severe pre-existing disease. Efforts should focus on identifying preexisting disease, creating uniform systems for assessing anesthetic stages, and limiting record-keeping variance.

蜥蜴麻醉:一家兽医院23年来(2000-2023年)麻醉方案和麻醉事件监测质量的回顾性研究。
目的:本研究的目的是总结在大学医院看到的蜥蜴麻醉事件,确定记录保存的挑战,并评估麻醉相关死亡率。方法:回顾2000年10月至2023年1月接受全身麻醉的蜥蜴的医疗记录。有完整麻醉记录的病例用于评估麻醉参数。收集的数据包括患者的一般细节、诊断、治疗程序、用药前、诱导、维持、监测和恢复。记录每个时间段的持续时间,当记录时,报告每个患者,以及使用的药物方案,并汇编以提供医院麻醉趋势的总体视图。还分析了时间,以评估是否有任何药物/方案导致更多的负面结果或延长麻醉时间。结果:共实施麻醉事件104例。99例有详细报告供分析。记录审查确定了经常导致记录管理不善的问题,并强调了最常用的麻醉剂。对于前用药,常见的是阿法沙龙、布托啡诺、咪达唑仑和氢吗啡酮。引产时,最常用的是阿法索酮或异丙酚。在维持方面,异氟醚和七氟醚具有可比性,而非吸入剂则倾向于使用阿法沙龙。99例患者中,95例康复,3例因预后不良被安乐死,1例未能康复;未能康复的1人有明显的潜在疾病。结论:维持性恒速输注替代吸入剂是主要发展趋势。麻醉的记录随着时间的推移而改善,除了麻醉时间记录。建议实施一个自动化系统,间歇性地记录生命体征,同时实施更新的麻醉表,其中包含专用于共同研究值的区域。临床意义:对没有严重疾病的蜥蜴进行全身麻醉是可靠和安全的。努力应集中在识别先前存在的疾病,创建统一的系统来评估麻醉阶段,并限制记录保存的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信