Evaluation of MicroScan and VITEK 2 systems for susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales with updated breakpoints.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-11 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1128/jcm.00048-25
Sandra S Richter, Elizabeth L Dominguez, Aaron A Hupp, Matt Griffis, Shawn H MacVane
{"title":"Evaluation of MicroScan and VITEK 2 systems for susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales with updated breakpoints.","authors":"Sandra S Richter, Elizabeth L Dominguez, Aaron A Hupp, Matt Griffis, Shawn H MacVane","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00048-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the performance of two commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems for contemporary Enterobacterales strains using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference standard with 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute or current FDA breakpoints applied. Enterobacterales clinical isolates with BMD results were tested in parallel using VITEK 2 AST test cards (N802, XN15, bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) and MicroScan NM56 AST panels (Beckman Coulter, Sacramento, CA, USA). The 200 isolates (57 <i>Escherichia coli</i>, 55 <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, 21 <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> complex, 18 <i>Serratia marcescens</i>, 12 <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>, 10 <i>Citrobacter koseri</i>, 9 <i>Citrobacter freundii</i>, 8 <i>Klebsiella oxytoca</i>, 5 <i>Klebsiella aerogenes</i>, 3 <i>Providencia stuartii</i>, and 2 <i>Morganella morganii</i>) included 25% extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), 23% carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and 4.5% AmpC resistance phenotypes. For the 28 antimicrobial agents tested, essential agreement (EA, MIC within ±1 doubling dilution), categorical agreement (CA, same categorical interpretation: susceptible, intermediate, susceptible dose dependent, and resistant), and error rates were calculated using BMD as the reference standard. Time to results (TTR) was determined for each instrument for all 200 isolates. Hands-on time was assessed by timing two technologists each setting up six batches of five isolates on each system. Accuracy was similar between systems with an overall CA > 94% and EA ≥ 96%. The CA was ≥90% for most agents tested on both systems (exceptions were ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoxitin, minocycline, and nitrofurantoin). The MicroScan with Prompt inoculum preparation required less hands-on setup time than VITEK (1.29 vs 1.83 min/isolate). The median instrument TTR was less for VITEK (11.7 vs 18 hours, <i>P</i> < 0.001), yielding an overall faster turnaround time.IMPORTANCEThere are limited data directly comparing the performance of commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems for contemporary bacterial strains using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method as the reference standard and applying updated breakpoints. These data will hopefully encourage labs to perform the necessary verification or validation studies needed to implement current breakpoints and ensure antimicrobial resistance is detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0004825"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00048-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the performance of two commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems for contemporary Enterobacterales strains using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference standard with 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute or current FDA breakpoints applied. Enterobacterales clinical isolates with BMD results were tested in parallel using VITEK 2 AST test cards (N802, XN15, bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) and MicroScan NM56 AST panels (Beckman Coulter, Sacramento, CA, USA). The 200 isolates (57 Escherichia coli, 55 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 21 Enterobacter cloacae complex, 18 Serratia marcescens, 12 Proteus mirabilis, 10 Citrobacter koseri, 9 Citrobacter freundii, 8 Klebsiella oxytoca, 5 Klebsiella aerogenes, 3 Providencia stuartii, and 2 Morganella morganii) included 25% extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), 23% carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and 4.5% AmpC resistance phenotypes. For the 28 antimicrobial agents tested, essential agreement (EA, MIC within ±1 doubling dilution), categorical agreement (CA, same categorical interpretation: susceptible, intermediate, susceptible dose dependent, and resistant), and error rates were calculated using BMD as the reference standard. Time to results (TTR) was determined for each instrument for all 200 isolates. Hands-on time was assessed by timing two technologists each setting up six batches of five isolates on each system. Accuracy was similar between systems with an overall CA > 94% and EA ≥ 96%. The CA was ≥90% for most agents tested on both systems (exceptions were ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoxitin, minocycline, and nitrofurantoin). The MicroScan with Prompt inoculum preparation required less hands-on setup time than VITEK (1.29 vs 1.83 min/isolate). The median instrument TTR was less for VITEK (11.7 vs 18 hours, P < 0.001), yielding an overall faster turnaround time.IMPORTANCEThere are limited data directly comparing the performance of commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems for contemporary bacterial strains using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method as the reference standard and applying updated breakpoints. These data will hopefully encourage labs to perform the necessary verification or validation studies needed to implement current breakpoints and ensure antimicrobial resistance is detected.

具有更新断点的肠杆菌药敏试验MicroScan和VITEK 2系统的评价
我们采用肉汤微量稀释(BMD)作为参考标准,采用2022年临床和实验室标准协会或现行FDA的断点,比较了两种商用抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST)系统对当代肠杆菌菌株的性能。采用VITEK 2 AST检测卡(N802, XN15, biomrieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA)和MicroScan NM56 AST检测板(Beckman Coulter, Sacramento, CA, USA)对具有BMD结果的肠杆菌临床分离菌进行平行检测。200株分离株(大肠埃希菌57株、肺炎克雷伯菌55株、阴沟复合肠杆菌21株、粘质沙雷菌18株、神奇变形杆菌12株、柯氏柠檬酸杆菌10株、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌9株、氧化克雷伯菌8株、产气克雷伯菌5株、斯华普罗维登菌3株、摩根氏摩根菌2株)包括25%广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)、23%耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)和4.5%耐AmpC表型。以BMD作为参考标准,计算28种抗菌药物的基本一致性(EA, MIC在±1倍稀释范围内)、分类一致性(CA,相同的分类解释:敏感、中间、敏感剂量依赖和耐药)和错误率。测定每种仪器对所有200株分离株的结果时间(TTR)。通过计时两名技术人员在每个系统上分别设置6批5个分离株来评估动手时间。准确度在总体CA bb0 94%和EA≥96%的系统之间相似。两种系统中大多数药物的CA≥90%(氨苄西林-舒巴坦、头孢西丁、米诺环素和呋喃妥英除外)。与VITEK相比,具有快速接种准备功能的MicroScan需要更少的动手设置时间(1.29 vs 1.83分钟/株)。VITEK的中位仪器TTR较低(11.7 vs 18小时,P < 0.001),总体周转时间更快。使用临床和实验室标准协会肉汤微量稀释法作为参考标准并应用更新的断点,直接比较商用抗菌药物敏感性检测系统对当代细菌菌株的性能的数据有限。这些数据有望鼓励实验室进行必要的验证或验证研究,以实施当前的断点,并确保检测到抗菌素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信