Baseline physical activity moderates brain-behaviour relationships in response to framed health messages.

Jeesung Ahn, Nicole Cooper, Yoona Kang, Matthew Brook O'Donnell, Mikella A Green, Nanna Notthoff, Laura L Carstensen, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin, Emily B Falk
{"title":"Baseline physical activity moderates brain-behaviour relationships in response to framed health messages.","authors":"Jeesung Ahn, Nicole Cooper, Yoona Kang, Matthew Brook O'Donnell, Mikella A Green, Nanna Notthoff, Laura L Carstensen, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin, Emily B Falk","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health messaging often employs gain-framing (highlighting behaviour benefits) or loss-framing (emphasizing nonengagement risks) to promote behaviour change. This study examined how neural responses to gain- and loss-framed messages predict changes in physical activity. We conducted a mega-analysis of raw fMRI and pedometer/accelerometer data from four studies (N = 240) that tracked brain activity during message exposure and real-world physical activity longitudinally. Focusing on brain regions theorized by the Affect-Integration-Motivation framework-the anterior insula, ventral striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal striatum, and presupplementary motor area-we found that baseline physical activity levels moderated brain-behaviour relationships in response to message framing. More active individuals increased physical activity post-intervention when these brain regions responded more strongly to loss-framed messages, suggesting that neural sensitivity to inactivity risks may reinforce behaviour maintenance in this group. Conversely, less active individuals increased physical activity when brain responses were stronger to gain-framed messages, indicating that sensitivity to activity benefits may facilitate action initiation in this group. These findings suggest that message effectiveness depends on the interaction between framing, neural processing, and pre-existing behavioural patterns. By linking neurocognitive mechanisms with real-world outcomes, we highlight the importance of personalized, neuroscience-informed health interventions tailored to individual neural and behavioural characteristics to optimize behaviour change strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health messaging often employs gain-framing (highlighting behaviour benefits) or loss-framing (emphasizing nonengagement risks) to promote behaviour change. This study examined how neural responses to gain- and loss-framed messages predict changes in physical activity. We conducted a mega-analysis of raw fMRI and pedometer/accelerometer data from four studies (N = 240) that tracked brain activity during message exposure and real-world physical activity longitudinally. Focusing on brain regions theorized by the Affect-Integration-Motivation framework-the anterior insula, ventral striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal striatum, and presupplementary motor area-we found that baseline physical activity levels moderated brain-behaviour relationships in response to message framing. More active individuals increased physical activity post-intervention when these brain regions responded more strongly to loss-framed messages, suggesting that neural sensitivity to inactivity risks may reinforce behaviour maintenance in this group. Conversely, less active individuals increased physical activity when brain responses were stronger to gain-framed messages, indicating that sensitivity to activity benefits may facilitate action initiation in this group. These findings suggest that message effectiveness depends on the interaction between framing, neural processing, and pre-existing behavioural patterns. By linking neurocognitive mechanisms with real-world outcomes, we highlight the importance of personalized, neuroscience-informed health interventions tailored to individual neural and behavioural characteristics to optimize behaviour change strategies.

基线体力活动调节对框架健康信息的脑-行为关系
健康信息传递通常采用收益框架(强调行为利益)或损失框架(强调不参与风险)来促进行为改变。这项研究考察了神经系统对增益和损耗框架信息的反应如何预测身体活动的变化。我们对来自四项研究(N = 240)的原始功能磁共振成像和计步器/加速度计数据进行了大规模分析,这些研究追踪了在信息暴露和现实世界的身体活动期间的大脑活动。关注由情感-整合-动机(AIM)框架理论构建的大脑区域——前脑岛、腹侧纹状体、vmPFC、背侧纹状体和sma前,我们发现基线体力活动水平调节了脑-行为对信息框架反应的关系。当这些大脑区域对失框信息的反应更强烈时,更活跃的个体在干预后增加了体力活动,这表明神经对不活动风险的敏感性可能会加强这一群体的行为维持。相反,当大脑对收益框架信息的反应更强烈时,不太活跃的个体会增加体力活动,这表明对活动收益的敏感性可能促进了这一群体的行动发起。这些发现表明,信息有效性取决于框架、神经处理和预先存在的行为模式之间的相互作用。通过将神经认知机制与现实世界的结果联系起来,我们强调了针对个体神经和行为特征量身定制的个性化、神经科学信息健康干预措施的重要性,以优化行为改变策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信