Evaluating Toxicity and Interaction Outcomes of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Aiden Kooyman, Jee Suk Chang, Mitchell Liu, Will Jiang, Alanah Bergman, Devin Schellenberg, Benjamin Mou, Abraham Alexander, Hannah Carolan, Fred Hsu, Stacy Miller, Siavash Atrchian, Elisa Chan, Clement Ho, Islam Mohamed, Angela Lin, Tanya Berrang, Andrew Bang, Nick Chng, Quinn Matthews, Vicky Huang, Ante Mestrovic, Derek Hyde, Chad Lund, Howard Pai, Boris Valev, Shilo Lefresne, Scott Tyldesley, Robert Olson, Sarah Baker
{"title":"Evaluating Toxicity and Interaction Outcomes of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial.","authors":"Aiden Kooyman, Jee Suk Chang, Mitchell Liu, Will Jiang, Alanah Bergman, Devin Schellenberg, Benjamin Mou, Abraham Alexander, Hannah Carolan, Fred Hsu, Stacy Miller, Siavash Atrchian, Elisa Chan, Clement Ho, Islam Mohamed, Angela Lin, Tanya Berrang, Andrew Bang, Nick Chng, Quinn Matthews, Vicky Huang, Ante Mestrovic, Derek Hyde, Chad Lund, Howard Pai, Boris Valev, Shilo Lefresne, Scott Tyldesley, Robert Olson, Sarah Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is known for low toxicity and safety, its combined use with specific systemic therapies requires further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the toxicity of SABR in combination with various systemic therapies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of the SABR-5 trial evaluated grade 2+ and 3+ toxicities post-SABR in patients who had received high-risk or non-high-risk systemic therapies before SABR at 4 predefined intervals: concurrent with SABR, 1 day to 1 week prior, 1 to 2 weeks prior, or 2 to 12 weeks prior. High-risk systemic therapy was a priori defined as drugs that may increase treatment toxicity when delivered in close proximity to SABR. This category encompasses cytotoxic chemotherapy, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CDK 4/6 inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, anti-VEGF agents, and anti-CTLA-4 agents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 380 patients, grade 2+ toxicity rates were 17.3% (35/202) off systemic therapy, 19.2% (19/99) on non-high-risk therapy, and 42.9% (3/7) on high-risk therapy concurrent with SABR. Grade 3+ rates were 3.5% (7/202), 4.0% (4/99), and 28.6% (2/7), respectively. On multivariable analysis, concurrent use of high-risk systemic therapy was associated with a higher risk of grade 3+ toxic effects (OR, 14.88; P = .009). No significant risk was noted when high-risk drugs were used within 1 week, 2 weeks, or 2 to 12 weeks of SABR or with any non-high-risk drugs. Grade 2+ toxic effects associated with concurrent high-risk systemic therapy were primarily bone/pain related. Increased tumor diameter also elevated grade 2+ toxicity risk (per 1 cm increment; G2+ OR, 1.19; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent use of high-risk drugs has demonstrated a potential of increased SABR-related toxicity, warranting caution in their concurrent use with SABR. In contrast, combining non-high-risk drugs (eg, hormonal therapy) with SABR did not increase risk. Further research is essential to identify risks associated with this therapeutic combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is known for low toxicity and safety, its combined use with specific systemic therapies requires further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the toxicity of SABR in combination with various systemic therapies.

Materials and methods: A secondary analysis of the SABR-5 trial evaluated grade 2+ and 3+ toxicities post-SABR in patients who had received high-risk or non-high-risk systemic therapies before SABR at 4 predefined intervals: concurrent with SABR, 1 day to 1 week prior, 1 to 2 weeks prior, or 2 to 12 weeks prior. High-risk systemic therapy was a priori defined as drugs that may increase treatment toxicity when delivered in close proximity to SABR. This category encompasses cytotoxic chemotherapy, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CDK 4/6 inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, anti-VEGF agents, and anti-CTLA-4 agents.

Results: Among 380 patients, grade 2+ toxicity rates were 17.3% (35/202) off systemic therapy, 19.2% (19/99) on non-high-risk therapy, and 42.9% (3/7) on high-risk therapy concurrent with SABR. Grade 3+ rates were 3.5% (7/202), 4.0% (4/99), and 28.6% (2/7), respectively. On multivariable analysis, concurrent use of high-risk systemic therapy was associated with a higher risk of grade 3+ toxic effects (OR, 14.88; P = .009). No significant risk was noted when high-risk drugs were used within 1 week, 2 weeks, or 2 to 12 weeks of SABR or with any non-high-risk drugs. Grade 2+ toxic effects associated with concurrent high-risk systemic therapy were primarily bone/pain related. Increased tumor diameter also elevated grade 2+ toxicity risk (per 1 cm increment; G2+ OR, 1.19; P < .001).

Conclusion: Concurrent use of high-risk drugs has demonstrated a potential of increased SABR-related toxicity, warranting caution in their concurrent use with SABR. In contrast, combining non-high-risk drugs (eg, hormonal therapy) with SABR did not increase risk. Further research is essential to identify risks associated with this therapeutic combination.

评估低转移性疾病的全身治疗和立体定向消融放疗的毒性和相互作用结果:对SABR-5 2期试验的二次分析
目的:虽然立体定向消融放射治疗(SABR)被认为是低毒和安全的,但其与特异性全身治疗的联合应用需要进一步的研究。本研究旨在评估SABR联合各种全身治疗的毒性。材料和方法:SABR-5试验的二次分析评估了在SABR前接受高风险或非高风险全身治疗的患者在SABR后的2+级和3+级毒性,这些患者在4个预定义的时间间隔:与SABR同时,1天至1周前,1至2周前,或2至12周前。高危全身治疗被先验地定义为在SABR附近使用时可能增加治疗毒性的药物。该类别包括细胞毒性化疗、多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂、cdk4 /6抑制剂、EGFR抑制剂、抗vegf药物和抗ctla -4药物。结果:380例患者中,全身治疗组2+级毒性率为17.3%(35/202),非高危治疗组为19.2%(19/99),高危治疗合并SABR组为42.9%(3/7)。3+级发生率分别为3.5%(7/202)、4.0%(4/99)和28.6%(2/7)。在多变量分析中,同时使用高风险全身治疗与更高的3+级毒性作用风险相关(OR, 14.88;P = .009)。当高风险药物在SABR的1周、2周、2 - 12周内或与任何非高风险药物一起使用时,没有发现显著的风险。并发高危全身治疗相关的2+级毒性作用主要与骨/疼痛相关。肿瘤直径增加也会增加2+级毒性风险(每增加1厘米;G2+ or, 1.19;P < 0.001)。结论:同时使用高风险药物可能增加SABR相关的毒性,因此与SABR同时使用时应谨慎。相比之下,非高危药物(如激素治疗)与SABR联合使用不会增加风险。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定与这种治疗组合相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信