[Non-pharmacological interventions: A new paradigm and opportunities for internists].

Grégory Ninot, Mathilde Minet, Jérôme Larché, Jean Ribstein, Laurent Chiche
{"title":"[Non-pharmacological interventions: A new paradigm and opportunities for internists].","authors":"Grégory Ninot, Mathilde Minet, Jérôme Larché, Jean Ribstein, Laurent Chiche","doi":"10.1016/j.revmed.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The notion of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) has been used by healthcare researchers since 1975, and is cited in numerous reports by French, European and international healthcare authorities, such as the WHO since 2003 and the HAS since 2011. However, it was only recently that a collaborative initiative of consensus was launched to address the lack of consensus on how to define and evaluate these health practices, amplified by the media controversy surrounding these practices during the COVID-19 episode. Indeed, in 2021, the launch of a collaborative and open research program responding to international scientific expectations in the healthcare field and to the specificities of these immaterial, personalized and targeted healthcare solutions has finally been initiated. The first part of this article, intended for specialists in internal medicine, describes the consensus-building work carried out under the guidance of a multidisciplinary committee, with the support of Inserm and the logistics of the international Non-Pharmacological Intervention Society (NPIS). Over a period of three years, this work, involving more than 1000 participants, established a definition, a characterization and an evaluative framework including 77 ethical and methodological recommendations for these practices. This NPIS Model framework has received the support of 30 French scientific and medical societies, two European societies and three French health authorities. The second part of the article presents the collaborative tools that have emerged from this work. Finally, the third part of the article looks at the implications of NPI for research and practice in the field of internal medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":94122,"journal":{"name":"La Revue de medecine interne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Revue de medecine interne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2025.04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) has been used by healthcare researchers since 1975, and is cited in numerous reports by French, European and international healthcare authorities, such as the WHO since 2003 and the HAS since 2011. However, it was only recently that a collaborative initiative of consensus was launched to address the lack of consensus on how to define and evaluate these health practices, amplified by the media controversy surrounding these practices during the COVID-19 episode. Indeed, in 2021, the launch of a collaborative and open research program responding to international scientific expectations in the healthcare field and to the specificities of these immaterial, personalized and targeted healthcare solutions has finally been initiated. The first part of this article, intended for specialists in internal medicine, describes the consensus-building work carried out under the guidance of a multidisciplinary committee, with the support of Inserm and the logistics of the international Non-Pharmacological Intervention Society (NPIS). Over a period of three years, this work, involving more than 1000 participants, established a definition, a characterization and an evaluative framework including 77 ethical and methodological recommendations for these practices. This NPIS Model framework has received the support of 30 French scientific and medical societies, two European societies and three French health authorities. The second part of the article presents the collaborative tools that have emerged from this work. Finally, the third part of the article looks at the implications of NPI for research and practice in the field of internal medicine.

[非药物干预:内科医生的新范式和机遇]。
自1975年以来,非药物干预(NPI)的概念一直被医疗保健研究人员使用,并被法国、欧洲和国际医疗保健机构(如2003年以来的世界卫生组织和2011年以来的has)的许多报告引用。然而,直到最近才发起了一项协商一致的合作倡议,以解决在如何定义和评估这些卫生做法方面缺乏共识的问题,这一问题在COVID-19疫情期间因媒体围绕这些做法的争议而被放大。事实上,在2021年,一项合作和开放的研究计划终于启动,以响应医疗保健领域的国际科学期望,以及这些非物质、个性化和有针对性的医疗保健解决方案的特殊性。本文的第一部分是针对内科专家的,描述了在一个多学科委员会的指导下,在Inserm和国际非药物干预协会(NPIS)的支持下,达成共识的工作。在三年的时间里,这项工作涉及1000多名参与者,建立了一个定义、一个特征和一个评估框架,其中包括77项针对这些实践的伦理和方法建议。这一国家健康信息系统模式框架得到了30个法国科学和医学学会、两个欧洲学会和三个法国卫生当局的支持。本文的第二部分介绍了从这项工作中产生的协作工具。最后,文章的第三部分着眼于NPI对内科领域的研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信