Comparing Single Dose Versus Multiple Doses Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Preventing Surgical Site Infections Following Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.
Onoriode Brotobor, Deliverance Brotobor, Jemima U Mukoro, Adedamola R Odeyale
{"title":"Comparing Single Dose Versus Multiple Doses Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Preventing Surgical Site Infections Following Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.","authors":"Onoriode Brotobor, Deliverance Brotobor, Jemima U Mukoro, Adedamola R Odeyale","doi":"10.71480/nmj.v66i1.670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of acute surgical abdomen. Studies have shown that a single dose of antibiotics is as effective as multiple doses in preventing surgical site infections (SSI) after appendectomy, with advantages such as cost savings, fewer adverse reactions, and reduced risk of antibiotic resistance. Despite these benefits, multiple doses are still commonly used. This study compared the efficacy of single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing SSI after open appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A one-year prospective study was conducted at the university of Benin teaching hospital (UBTH), Benin City, involving 62 adult patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. A total of 76 patients were initially recruited, but after histological evaluation, 62 patients were analyzed, 29 received a single dose of antibiotics, and 33 received multiple doses following the exclusion of the negative appendicectomies. All patients were given intravenous 1.5 g cefuroxime and 500 mg metronidazole at anesthesia induction, with the multiple-dose group receiving two additional doses. Outcomes assessed included SSI occurrence, cost of antibiotics, and SSI management costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SSI rates were similar between groups (3.5% vs. 3.0%), but the cost of multiple-dose regimens was over twice that of single-dose. Side effects were more frequent with multiple doses. Both SSI cases were superficial and associated with higher BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is equally effective, more economical, and safer than multiple doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"66 1","pages":"187-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71480/nmj.v66i1.670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of acute surgical abdomen. Studies have shown that a single dose of antibiotics is as effective as multiple doses in preventing surgical site infections (SSI) after appendectomy, with advantages such as cost savings, fewer adverse reactions, and reduced risk of antibiotic resistance. Despite these benefits, multiple doses are still commonly used. This study compared the efficacy of single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing SSI after open appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.
Methodology: A one-year prospective study was conducted at the university of Benin teaching hospital (UBTH), Benin City, involving 62 adult patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. A total of 76 patients were initially recruited, but after histological evaluation, 62 patients were analyzed, 29 received a single dose of antibiotics, and 33 received multiple doses following the exclusion of the negative appendicectomies. All patients were given intravenous 1.5 g cefuroxime and 500 mg metronidazole at anesthesia induction, with the multiple-dose group receiving two additional doses. Outcomes assessed included SSI occurrence, cost of antibiotics, and SSI management costs.
Results: SSI rates were similar between groups (3.5% vs. 3.0%), but the cost of multiple-dose regimens was over twice that of single-dose. Side effects were more frequent with multiple doses. Both SSI cases were superficial and associated with higher BMI.
Conclusion: Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is equally effective, more economical, and safer than multiple doses.
背景:急性阑尾炎是急性外科腹部的主要原因。研究表明,在预防阑尾切除术后手术部位感染(SSI)方面,单剂量抗生素与多剂量抗生素同样有效,具有节约成本、减少不良反应、降低抗生素耐药风险等优点。尽管有这些好处,多次服用仍然是常用的。本研究比较了单剂量和多剂量抗生素预防无并发症阑尾炎开放性阑尾切除术后SSI的疗效。方法:在贝宁市贝宁大学教学医院(UBTH)进行了一项为期一年的前瞻性研究,涉及62例成人无并发症阑尾炎患者。最初共招募了76名患者,但经过组织学评估,对62名患者进行了分析,29名患者接受了单剂量抗生素治疗,33名患者在排除阑尾切除术阴性后接受了多剂量抗生素治疗。所有患者在麻醉诱导时静脉滴注头孢呋辛1.5 g和甲硝唑500 mg,多剂量组再加2剂。评估的结果包括SSI发生率、抗生素成本和SSI管理成本。结果:两组间SSI发生率相似(3.5% vs. 3.0%),但多剂量方案的成本是单剂量方案的两倍以上。多剂量的副作用更频繁。两例SSI均为浅表性,并伴有较高的BMI。结论:单剂量抗生素预防与多剂量抗生素预防同样有效、更经济、更安全。