Associations between absolute and relative handgrip strength with fitness and fatness.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2537-7537
David Abdelnour, Mark Grove Ii, Keegan Pulford-Thorpe, Keaton Windhurst, Charlee LeCrone, Edward Kerr Iii, Tamara Hew-Butler
{"title":"Associations between absolute and relative handgrip strength with fitness and fatness.","authors":"David Abdelnour, Mark Grove Ii, Keegan Pulford-Thorpe, Keaton Windhurst, Charlee LeCrone, Edward Kerr Iii, Tamara Hew-Butler","doi":"10.1055/a-2537-7537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main purpose of this study was to assess relationships between absolute and relative handgrip strength (HGS) versus other markers of health (body composition) and physical fitness (VO <sub>2</sub> max, vertical jump) in 220 (112 male) healthy young adults (25±10 years). HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. Absolute HGS represented the highest grip strength measurement (kg) of the right and left hand combined, while relative HGS represented the absolute HGS divided by body weight (kg/kg). Body composition (lean and fat mass) was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. VO <sub>2</sub> max was measured using a treadmill peak speed protocol (ml/kg/min), while vertical jump was assessed using a countermovement jump (cm). Absolute HGS (mean=86±22 kg) was positively related with lean mass (r=0.82, p<0.001) and vertical jump (r=0.63, p<0.001), while relative HGS (mean=1.2±0.2 kg/kg) was negatively related with body fat (r=-0.69, p<0.001), but positively correlated with VO <sub>2</sub> max (r=0.47, p<0.001), and vertical jump (r=0.45, p<0.001). Linear models suggest that lean mass, body fat, and vertical jump predicted 69% of variance for absolute HGS (adjusted R <sup>2</sup> =0.71, p<0.001), while lean mass and body fat predicted 49% of variance for relative HGS (adjusted R <sup>2</sup> =0.49, p<0.001). Lower relative HGS scores (<1.0 kg/kg) were associated with higher body fat levels and may represent a quick, simple, marker of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"9 ","pages":"a25377537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2537-7537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to assess relationships between absolute and relative handgrip strength (HGS) versus other markers of health (body composition) and physical fitness (VO 2 max, vertical jump) in 220 (112 male) healthy young adults (25±10 years). HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. Absolute HGS represented the highest grip strength measurement (kg) of the right and left hand combined, while relative HGS represented the absolute HGS divided by body weight (kg/kg). Body composition (lean and fat mass) was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. VO 2 max was measured using a treadmill peak speed protocol (ml/kg/min), while vertical jump was assessed using a countermovement jump (cm). Absolute HGS (mean=86±22 kg) was positively related with lean mass (r=0.82, p<0.001) and vertical jump (r=0.63, p<0.001), while relative HGS (mean=1.2±0.2 kg/kg) was negatively related with body fat (r=-0.69, p<0.001), but positively correlated with VO 2 max (r=0.47, p<0.001), and vertical jump (r=0.45, p<0.001). Linear models suggest that lean mass, body fat, and vertical jump predicted 69% of variance for absolute HGS (adjusted R 2 =0.71, p<0.001), while lean mass and body fat predicted 49% of variance for relative HGS (adjusted R 2 =0.49, p<0.001). Lower relative HGS scores (<1.0 kg/kg) were associated with higher body fat levels and may represent a quick, simple, marker of health.

绝对握力和相对握力与健康和肥胖之间的关系。
本研究的主要目的是评估220名(112名男性)健康青年(25±10岁)的绝对握力和相对握力(HGS)与其他健康指标(身体成分)和体能(最大VO 2、垂直跳)之间的关系。HGS采用手测力仪测量。绝对HGS代表右手和左手的最高握力测量值(kg),相对HGS代表绝对HGS除以体重(kg/kg)。采用双能x线吸收仪测量体成分(瘦脂肪量)。使用跑步机峰值速度方案(ml/kg/min)测量VO 2 max,而使用反运动跳跃(cm)评估垂直跳跃。绝对HGS (mean=86±22 kg)与瘦体重呈正相关(r=0.82, p2 max) (r=0.47, p2 =0.71, p2 =0.49, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信