David Abdelnour, Mark Grove Ii, Keegan Pulford-Thorpe, Keaton Windhurst, Charlee LeCrone, Edward Kerr Iii, Tamara Hew-Butler
{"title":"Associations between absolute and relative handgrip strength with fitness and fatness.","authors":"David Abdelnour, Mark Grove Ii, Keegan Pulford-Thorpe, Keaton Windhurst, Charlee LeCrone, Edward Kerr Iii, Tamara Hew-Butler","doi":"10.1055/a-2537-7537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main purpose of this study was to assess relationships between absolute and relative handgrip strength (HGS) versus other markers of health (body composition) and physical fitness (VO <sub>2</sub> max, vertical jump) in 220 (112 male) healthy young adults (25±10 years). HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. Absolute HGS represented the highest grip strength measurement (kg) of the right and left hand combined, while relative HGS represented the absolute HGS divided by body weight (kg/kg). Body composition (lean and fat mass) was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. VO <sub>2</sub> max was measured using a treadmill peak speed protocol (ml/kg/min), while vertical jump was assessed using a countermovement jump (cm). Absolute HGS (mean=86±22 kg) was positively related with lean mass (r=0.82, p<0.001) and vertical jump (r=0.63, p<0.001), while relative HGS (mean=1.2±0.2 kg/kg) was negatively related with body fat (r=-0.69, p<0.001), but positively correlated with VO <sub>2</sub> max (r=0.47, p<0.001), and vertical jump (r=0.45, p<0.001). Linear models suggest that lean mass, body fat, and vertical jump predicted 69% of variance for absolute HGS (adjusted R <sup>2</sup> =0.71, p<0.001), while lean mass and body fat predicted 49% of variance for relative HGS (adjusted R <sup>2</sup> =0.49, p<0.001). Lower relative HGS scores (<1.0 kg/kg) were associated with higher body fat levels and may represent a quick, simple, marker of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"9 ","pages":"a25377537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2537-7537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to assess relationships between absolute and relative handgrip strength (HGS) versus other markers of health (body composition) and physical fitness (VO 2 max, vertical jump) in 220 (112 male) healthy young adults (25±10 years). HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. Absolute HGS represented the highest grip strength measurement (kg) of the right and left hand combined, while relative HGS represented the absolute HGS divided by body weight (kg/kg). Body composition (lean and fat mass) was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. VO 2 max was measured using a treadmill peak speed protocol (ml/kg/min), while vertical jump was assessed using a countermovement jump (cm). Absolute HGS (mean=86±22 kg) was positively related with lean mass (r=0.82, p<0.001) and vertical jump (r=0.63, p<0.001), while relative HGS (mean=1.2±0.2 kg/kg) was negatively related with body fat (r=-0.69, p<0.001), but positively correlated with VO 2 max (r=0.47, p<0.001), and vertical jump (r=0.45, p<0.001). Linear models suggest that lean mass, body fat, and vertical jump predicted 69% of variance for absolute HGS (adjusted R 2 =0.71, p<0.001), while lean mass and body fat predicted 49% of variance for relative HGS (adjusted R 2 =0.49, p<0.001). Lower relative HGS scores (<1.0 kg/kg) were associated with higher body fat levels and may represent a quick, simple, marker of health.